• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Sex Ed.

kal-el said:
I realize we don't want to hear it. But if our parents fail to inform us about sex or masturbation, we'll learn it on the street. There's a reason why we have sex organs- to give us pleasure, and to multiply. There's nothing to be ashamed of being naked. We were born naked. And masterbation is totally natural, again there's nothing to be ashamed of there.

I don't agree, when I was a teen, I learned all about sex from porn. Larry Flint has a true purpose in life, and that is it.
 
By stopping kids from finding out the pleasures that their bodies bring,or inflicting kids with guilt at the highest level, and comparing maturbating with evil, is acting like a criminal.

Now that science can show how masturbation doesn't impose any of the evils that was said, and that it is fundamental and paramount during the crucial stage when a child discovers his own body, it is indeed time to forget about all those stories that frowned upon it, and who peddled such foolish and guilt-inducing idiocies.
 
Ive always fantacized about having sex with a hott sex-ed teacher. She can teach me tease me please me. Ohh mental pictures. Yeepeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!

Now for those of you who think im far right. I think there should be a experimental lab for sex-ed. Meaning when the teacher goes over oral sex they get to practice, hehe I wish I had that. That would be tax dollars well spent :rofl
 
SKILMATIC said:
Ive always fantacized about having sex with a hott sex-ed teacher. She can teach me tease me please me. Ohh mental pictures. Yeepeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!

Now for those of you who think im far right. I think there should be a experimental lab for sex-ed. Meaning when the teacher goes over oral sex they get to practice, hehe I wish I had that. That would be tax dollars well spent :rofl

I can't argue there.:rofl
 
galenrox said:
damn straight brother, DAMN straight!!!
Like I was a teenager less than a year ago, and I was a speed addict (hurts libido), and I was on anti-depressents (also hurting the libido) and I once I had sex 8 times in 4 hours while on anti-depressents and high on speed.
Think about that, exactly how sexually driven you have to be to:
a)find someone willing to have sex 8 times in 4 hours
b)actually be able to do so.

...Dude. I bet she was sore. :shock:
 
Well since we on are on the subject, I once got a girl so wet, there was a puddle the size of a bowling ball on the bed!:smile:
 
[Moderator mode... time... status... shut up, just listen]

Bowling balls? Speed, depressants, and sex? Guys, this is a little out of hand, don't you think? Tone it down. If you want to discuss past sexual experiences, please do so on your own time or if you must, do it in a forum not open to the public.

[Moderator off... power down... unplug... whatever]
 
Good idea... the bowling ball has put me off my appetite for a week. o_O
 
kal-el said:
Well since we on are on the subject, I once got a girl so wet, there was a puddle the size of a bowling ball on the bed!:smile:
impressive, but yeah, that's a gross thing to think about there brother.
 
vergiss said:
...Dude. I bet she was sore. :shock:
yeah, it was my girlfriend, and I hadn't seen her in a week, so yeah...she was.
 
steen said:
And then they can be picking up road kill instead, while your child becomes a physician.


Well, if the parent is that bad of a parent, then its the parents fault for forcing the kid out of a vital class.


So, I really don't care. It doesn't affect me certainly, since most parents wouldn't do this...
 
128shot said:
Well, if the parent is that bad of a parent, then its the parents fault for forcing the kid out of a vital class.


So, I really don't care. It doesn't affect me certainly, since most parents wouldn't do this...
But you don't care the the children suffer for their parents' ignorance? Perhaps Scientologists are right, then? We should stop medical care for kids if the parents don't believe in it?
 
or you could do something along the lines of child rights.

Where they can overthrow their parents will in a situation such as recieving medical care or their education, it would have to be a very specific law, though.
 
steen said:
But you don't care the the children suffer for their parents' ignorance? Perhaps Scientologists are right, then? We should stop medical care for kids if the parents don't believe in it?

That is not scientologists who believe that, its Christian Scientists.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
That is not scientologists who believe that, its Christian Scientists.
My mistake. Sorry, you are right.
 
steen said:
My mistake. Sorry, you are right.

I'm episcopalian, so I really dont care other than I figured some scientologist might get offended.:2razz:
 
Sexual education should cover all the scientic aspects, from how the biology works, what STD are, how you can protect yourself...and yes, that would include all available contraceptions.

The morals if deemed necessary can be discussed at home.
 
ludahai said:
What we are talking about is teaching so-called "safe sex" to children. I object to the government going in and telling my children that putting on a condom and having sex is "safe" and acceptable. In your book, perhaps it is. Not in mine. I have a right to teach my children morals, NOT the state. If it violates the religious strictures I am trying to teach my children, I HAVE THE RIGHT to opt my children out of the program.

I suggest you excercise this right while homeschooling.
 
What we are talking about is teaching so-called "safe sex" to children. I object to the government going in and telling my children that putting on a condom and having sex is "safe" and acceptable. In your book, perhaps it is. Not in mine. I have a right to teach my children morals, NOT the state. If it violates the religious strictures I am trying to teach my children, I HAVE THE RIGHT to opt my children out of the program.

Thats all well and good but not everybody thinks like you. Would you rather have your kids having sex without condoms? You can try and teach them morals at home but there a certain things that they have to know and you can't just scare them.
 
I don't think it is the school's responsibility at all. I think Sex Ed, is a bad idea, because i went through it, we had a feminist teacher who said that sex is a horrible thing to do, and if we did it, then we WOULD get and STD or we WOULD get a girl pregnant. That is an example of a bad opinion of sex. If we want our kids to learn about sex, teach it yourself and stop being scared to talk about that kind of stuff to your son/daughter.
 
shakenbake19 said:
I don't think it is the school's responsibility at all. I think Sex Ed, is a bad idea, because i went through it, we had a feminist teacher who said that sex is a horrible thing to do, and if we did it, then we WOULD get and STD or we WOULD get a girl pregnant. That is an example of a bad opinion of sex. If we want our kids to learn about sex, teach it yourself and stop being scared to talk about that kind of stuff to your son/daughter.

Thats true to a point. But you know as well as I do that parents would scare the living crap out of them about it casue they are looking after their kids. But I think its better if they know the facts which all parents dont know the facts. So I think there needs to be a level of both.
 
shakenbake19 said:
I don't think it is the school's responsibility at all. I think Sex Ed, is a bad idea, because i went through it, we had a feminist teacher who said that sex is a horrible thing to do, and if we did it, then we WOULD get and STD or we WOULD get a girl pregnant. That is an example of a bad opinion of sex. If we want our kids to learn about sex, teach it yourself and stop being scared to talk about that kind of stuff to your son/daughter.

I think it's important for the schools to teach kids how to be safe. How to use contraceptives with "perfect use" rather than "typical use." At the same time I don't think school should be passing out condoms to children. I think that that's the difference between educating about sex and encouraging sex. Also I do feel it's important that the parents be involved in their child's education on such a sensitve topic.
 
shakenbake19 said:
I don't think it is the school's responsibility at all. I think Sex Ed, is a bad idea, because i went through it, we had a feminist teacher who said that sex is a horrible thing to do, and if we did it, then we WOULD get and STD or we WOULD get a girl pregnant. That is an example of a bad opinion of sex. If we want our kids to learn about sex, teach it yourself and stop being scared to talk about that kind of stuff to your son/daughter.

How many sons and daughters would actually want to hear it from their parents?
 
I think that whether you encourage it or not, kids will still do it. Hell, I did. But do i have an STD? No. Did I get a girl pregnant? No. But it happens. You don't want to discourage it, because belive it or not, kids will still do it. Hell, I did. Discouraging it would almost be bad, because kids would do it just to break the rules.
 
shakenbake19 said:
I think that whether you encourage it or not, kids will still do it. Hell, I did. But do i have an STD? No. Did I get a girl pregnant? No. But it happens. You don't want to discourage it, because belive it or not, kids will still do it. Hell, I did. Discouraging it would almost be bad, because kids would do it just to break the rules.

Agreed, Kids will be kids.
 
Back
Top Bottom