• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Several boats sink during Texas parade for President Trump

Once again, more excuses and deflection (something regressives are extremely prone to doing). But sadly, they are extremely terrible at it.


-Forgetting the fact that he's been calling for law & order for nearly four and a half months. I'm still glad and somewhat disappointed to see that you can't do anything more than lie about something that we've been literally seeing for that exact time.
-The protestors threatened federal property. Which is why they were sent in to help deal with the riots. If you want to keep up the lies and call them something like fascist troops/storm troopers. If you want to have a discussion on if they did something outside of their power. Then that's a fine discussion to have. Other then that however, you're going to be found sorely short on the subject.
-Lying about the protestors being peaceful. Is another issue that you're going to have to deal with as well.
-Ditton on your side as well.


Oh that's good. So that means a vast amount of the boogaloo boys and those people who tore up Charlottesville. Were all just "left wing agitators" in very poor costumes. Give me a ****ing break :lamo



-You would actually need to prove as such first.
-Other then some missile and drone strikes. I've had no real issue with anything else that Trump's been directly linked with.

Once again, you answer a well cited post with nothing but your impressions, probably derived from your fact-free political porn collection. Saying things are this or that is meaningless unless you can add substance to those assertions. You are only telling us how you perceive things, not how they are. That is all clear to the readers here that all can contrast your post of impressions and ignorance to to my post that was well cited. You would make a very bad lawyer, attempting you argue your point when the other guy had all the evidence. Pathetic.

Then again, just trying to sell your impressions of things as how they actually are, without actually using a little brain power to actual understand how they are is right out the Trump playbook. Our entire country is run on emotion right now, with science and facts the casualty. Thank you for you contribution to that.
 
Last edited:
Once again, you answer a well cited post with nothing but your impressions, probably derived from your fact-free political porn collection. Saying things are this or that is meaningless unless you can add substance to those assertions. You are only telling us how you perceive things, not how they are. Its clear to all the readers here that have contrasted your ignorance to to my post that was well documented with cites.

You would make a very bad lawyer, attempting you argue your point when the other guy had all the evidence. Pathetic.
What well cited post? It was full of the same assumptions and allegations that most of what you post normally contains.

Apart from federal agents actually being in Portland. You were hard pressed to actually be found as correct.
 
Back
Top Bottom