- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 31,089
- Reaction score
- 4,384
- Location
- The greatest city on Earth
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
This can't be a serious question, or you just have no idea who these people are.
please explain that term........what is at all liberal about them?
You want me to explain to you what a liberal is?
Liberal Republicans have Liberal social values but Conservative fiscal values.
So, what liberal social values do the Westboro folks have? are they pro choice? pro environment? anti-gun control? pro- affirmative action? against the death penalty?
what Liberal social views do the WBC folks have?
you've been asked three times now.
Liberal-right views like welcoming the death of gays? You aren't being serious at all.
You want me to explain to you what a liberal is?
never mind, jerry. i don't care anymore.
that is a liberal social view?
on what planet?
Liberal Republicans are socially Liberal and fiscally Conservative.
....As I said before all the inane, vauge questions began, there is a difference between the liberal right and the liberal left.
A good example is the separation of Church and State. The liberal right wants a theocracy while the liberal left wants every public facade sterilized of religious reference.
On abortion, the liberal right wants no abortion at all for any reason, while the liberal left wants easy access to abortion by 12 y/o'ds without their parent's knowledge or consent, and of course at tax-payer expense.
Each side radically opposing the other, sometimes with explosives, and always ****ing up the world for the rest of us.
Wanna bet what would happen if you called them "Liberals"?
Pro-Life is not a Liberal view. Supporting a theocracy is not a Liberal view. You are either just playing silly TGIF games, or have no clue what American Liberalism is.
..Thinking that bombing an abortion clinic is ok is a liberal view.
..Being pro-choice is not a liberal view....
ok, I see that you are just playing games and have no intention of taking this debate seriously. We are done.
That's called putting the shoe on the other foot.
Here pal, thank me later ...Being pro-life is not a liberal view.
Thinking that bombing an abortion clinic is ok is a liberal view.
****
Being pro-choice is not a liberal view.
Thinking that secretly getting a 12 y/o an abortion w/o her parent's knowledge or consent is a liberal view.
****
Most of the time Moderates and Conservatives can at least agree on enough mutual ground to keep the planet spinning. Liberals, however, are fighting on whether to spin the planet off into space or slam-dunk it into the sun.
No it's called trolling. And the right does it quite a bit here. There is no such thing as what Jerry is describing being attributed to liberals.
Here pal, thank me later ...
Dictionary.com | Find the Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com
It's done often by those of all beliefs. Actually, by trying to paint this as something one side does, in a way you are doing the very same thing.
Only because your liberal do you say the right does it quite a bit. I on the other hand see just as much or more from liberal posters.No it's called trolling. And the right does it quite a bit here.
Says you... perhaps to someone else, there may be such a thing.There is no such thing as what Jerry is describing being attributed to liberals.
Well that's the claim anyway... I more or less see those "you're not using the term correctly" as BS because there's still a stigma associated with both socialism and Marxisim and liberals want to stay as far away from it as possible - hence the constant criticism. Don't get me wrong, it's a very valid and good tactic which has been successful for quite many years - so much so that one could almost say people have been brain washed into believing it to the extent that, such defense is little needed. Just like people think Christopher Columbus discovered America.Kinda like how conservatives don't know how to use socialist and Marxist correctly.
Everyone's group has their violent parts --- it's part of the human condition. Liberals have them too. Funny you didn't mention that.I do however like the fact that Jerry adds the word "right" to the extremes as violent. It's irony that I'm sure is lost on him. :lol:
"Inaccurate and discredited??"Why would I thank you for a link to an inaccurate and discredited dictionary?
Webster ftw. You're welcome.
"Inaccurate and discredited??"
:lamo :lamo :lamo
You're funny.
Still, you're in desperate need of a dictionary. Use any one of your choosing.
Why aren't they apart of the discussion? Last time I checked, "Marijuana churches" aren't a part of the discussion either. I know enough of them.
You asked me for an example and I gave you one. Then you brought up all these unnecessary people. If you don't want an answer, don't ask the question.
Since you confess you're a troll, there is no reason to continue posting to you.It's a lack of experience which leads you to assume my posts are born from a lack of accuret information. You're assuming I desire objective and substantive debate 24/7/365+1.
Those who desire real discussions go to the loft, or ask for a True Debate thread.
This is not The Loft.
[video=youtube;efHCdKb5UWc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=efHCdKb5UWc[/video]
I desire spirited discussions; the old, original definition of "flame" before it was reduced to mean 'insulting'. Threads which resemble Comedy Central's Roast interest me the most.
Since you confess you're a troll, there is no reason to continue posting to you.
Ciao.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?