- Joined
- Nov 25, 2019
- Messages
- 82,802
- Reaction score
- 21,954
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yes, and learn some things.Follow you? Seriously? Right to the next lie, the next misleading headline?
How could he think that after his DOJ investigated every election fraud claim and conspiracy theory and came back and told Trump there was no such fraud, and all the Secretaries of State he called told him his fraud claims were false, and his 60 lawsuits about the election all failed for lack of evidence, and at that point how can ANYONE "think" the election was stolen? No, he didn't think he was robbed, he knew there was no evidence the election was stolen from him. He knew, and proceeded to defraud the American people anyway, and apparently you and these other sorry apologists believed him? You gotta be kidding me! This is utter insanity.Because Trump has the right to say he thinks he was robbed.....
Pure trollshit that deserves no further response.It really was a minor event.
DCCougar said:
Section 1505 outlaws obstructing congressional or federal administrative proceedings, a crime
punishable by imprisonment not more than five years....
Are you serious?The thing here is that Congress is not an agency or a department of the USA.
It does codify obstructing Congress when it is in committee or engaging in some type of investigation.
But none of that was going on Jan 6,
How could he think that after his DOJ investigated every election fraud claim and conspiracy theory and came back and told Trump there was no such fraud, and all the Secretaries of State he called told him his fraud claims were false, and his 60 lawsuits about the election all failed for lack of evidence, and at that point how can ANYONE "think" the election was stolen? No, he didn't think he was robbed, he knew there was no evidence the election was stolen from him. He knew, and proceeded to defraud the American people anyway, and apparently you and these other sorry apologists believed him? You gotta be kidding me! This is utter insanity.
But we do know that: There were conspiracy trials, people were convicted.1) you don't know that
2) irrelevant
Yes- because there was no evidence to suggest he was part of any conspiracy to storm the White House.Stone wasnt on trial. So again irrelevant
sure but thats not what we are talking about here..so irrelevant
Actually there is.. its called conspiracy.
I don't have to have anything. You have to have something.Again you have nothing
The Democrats used it like they used Covid and the overturning of Roe V Wade. They have nothing else to offer but fear.Pure trollshit that deserves no further response.
Follow me to improve your debating skills and you'll see I am like the guy in the Dos Equis commercial. I don't always post a link, but when I do I include an excerpt. The way I see it is that I have more consideration for another poster's time than my own. In many cases with an excerpt, the reader doesn't have to spend 5-30 minutes reading some off-the-wall twenty-something liberal who gets to call herself a reporter because she works at WaPo.
I just think it's the right thing to do. But, alas <sigh> it seems that liberals don't care about that anymore. Those days are long gone.
Yes, and learn some things.
The Democrats used it like they used Covid and the overturning of Roe V Wade. They have nothing else to offer but fear.
The Democrats have replaced Christianity as the largest cult in America and have adopted quite successfully all of their tactics to get and keep converts.More pure trolls BS.
The Democrats have replaced Christianity as the largest cult in America and have adopted quite successfully all of their tactics to get and keep converts.
In the early stages Christianity had trouble with the guilt trip of original sin as their only drawing card. That concept is adopted by the left now to control unruly and unbelievers that there is systematic racism. So the left uses fear like Christianity uses the concept of hell. it works like a charm.
The Democrats used it like they used Covid and the overturning of Roe V Wade. They have nothing else to offer but fear.
I was reading an article in The Economist. One of the people there went absolutely nuts when Trump said what he did on Jan 6th and started breaking windows, etc. This lady had never been in trouble with the law and was only going there to hear him speak, not to participate in the ransacking of the Capitol. There is something to be said about Trump's "talent" to make people do something they would never ever do in a single speech.Bro…
He spent months denying the election results.
On the day of the certification, whipped his band of white nationalists into a frenzy and told them to go to the capitol where they attacked it.
Then didn’t do anything about it.
Whatever the failure of law enforcement, doesn’t absolve the president of his traitorous actions.
Nationalism is good and necessary as is being proven by the Muslim riots in France as i type this. Dioversitry doe not = strength. Set asides and AA has ruined black America,There is systematic racism, as the Supreme Court and its right wing accolades have demonstrated.
The core of trumpism is white “nationalism” (bigotry).
What comes out of the mouths of GOP politicians today is identical to the language that came out of racist politicians in the 1950’ and 60’s.
When Texas introduced its latest round of voter suppression laws, the speaker was reminded that he was using the exact same language to justify his actions and Texas legistors 150 years ago used to introduce “Jim Crow” laws. Almost word for word.
Why do you think that Fox Noise feeds you a constant B roll of black people in the streets (even though it was four years ago) as if it were breaking news?
This infantile comment is about as effective as "I know you are but what am I?"The Democrats have replaced Christianity as the largest cult in America....
Why? Everything the Democrats do and their tactics used to make people obey and control them is identical to how the Christians get and keep converts and believers. I can think of not one method that the Christians use to indoctrinate and propagandize that the Democrats do not also use.This infantile comment is about as effective as "I know you are but what am I?"
Nationalism is good and necessary as is being proven by the Muslim riots in France as i type this. Dioversitry doe not = strength. Set asides and AA has ruined black America,
I have to have an ID to vote. It is an elitist insult by white saviors that blacks somehow don't know how to get an ID.
On your voting situation, no one ever said life was easy.For the first point, I'm not entirely sure what AA, black America, and Muslim riots and France have to do with American nationalism and Jan. 6th. But assuming for a moment they are all related, American nationalism, or "classic" nationalism, the pride in one's country, was never the issue. The issue is taking pride in factors that can't be helped (i.e., skin color) and assuming that people of one characteristic or another is my desirable. That is not what I would consider "American nationalism," that is a bare minimum, someone looking to grasp at straws for something to be proud about (i.e., a bum who hasn't amounted to anything manufacturing something to be proud of), and at maximum, raw xenophobia. See, the problem is not pride in one's country. The problem is that unchecked pride leads to white nationalism, leads to raw xenophobia, with the latter two holding up progress.
As far as your second point, if you think that's the problem with voter ID law, then you're missing the forest for the trees. The problem with instituting voter ID laws are twofold: 1) the requirement for a voting ID (Which can be restrictive -- a tenant might not be able to meet any of those requirements), and 2) the timing of the introduction of the law. Texas once passed a law within a week of an election. For me, a white guy, I couldn't get a voter ID in that amount of time. I'm a pedestrian and have no license. And depending on the area, Ubers might not be available and I might have to bum a ride from someone.
"No one ever said life was easy" -- that's what you'd say to the millions of people, both white and black, who would have the same problem I would have had? The court decided that the law was legit, but the timing was not, so the courts allowed the law to take effect next election, thereby giving everyone 2 years to get an ID in the next federal election and making it almost impossible to have an excuse for not having an ID. Which solution is more practical?On your voting situation, no one ever said life was easy.
On Nationalism, are you saying that Hispanics and blacks should not be a Nationalist, which means pride in your country, America/
Regarding France, there is a near blackout of news on the riots which are by MUSLIMS because they don't want to be considered racist. This Muislim was a career criminal and the officers' life was in danger. But like white on black in America now, they blame the white guy first even if it is a cop. France is what happens when globalist ideas take root where a country takes in all comers and gives them stuff like we are doing ourselves here in the USA. Those newcomers have NO allegiance to the country they invaded. Their allegiance in the case of France is to Muslims and Islam. This is what diversity, inclusion, equity, and globalism do to a country.
Fortunately, this also means the demise of Macron. The French people have had quite enough of his globalism now.
Nationalism is good and necessary as is being proven by the Muslim riots in France as i type this. Dioversitry doe not = strength. Set asides and AA has ruined black America,
I have to have an ID to vote. It is an elitist insult by white saviors that blacks somehow don't know how to get an ID.
Actually, both now that you mention it. The riots over pension reform just show how entrenched people get with free stuff. In this case, being paid NOT to work and complaining about having to work to the ripe old age of 64!!! Once people get used to something like that it is near imp[ossible to break them away from the teat."No one ever said life was easy" -- that's what you'd say to the millions of people, both white and black, who would have the same problem I would have had? The court decided that the law was legit, but the timing was not, so the courts allowed the law to take effect next election, thereby giving everyone 2 years to get an ID in the next federal election and making it almost impossible to have an excuse for not having an ID. Which solution is more practical?
I never said anything about which race should be Nationalist. Read. my. posts.
Which riots are you talking about? The riots over pension reform? Or the riots over the teenage boy who was shot and killed by police? Be specific.
I am not so sure he is. He is a highly intelligent individual. I believe he got in on his merits.Racism masquerading as “nationalism” is still racism. It’s just hiding behind another name. And not very well, at that. As the riots in France demonstrate.
“Diversity does not equal strength”
Yes, we know. We heard that from Hitler, Goebells, Julius Striker and the rest.
“Set asides and AA has ruined black America”.
Try backing up that empty claim.
Of course, you could ask Clarence Thomas. He is a product of AA.
Actually, both now that you mention it. The riots over pension reform just show how entrenched people get with free stuff. In this case, being paid NOT to work and complaining about having to work to the ripe old age of 64!!! Once people get used to something like that it is near imp[ossible to break them away from the teat.
The riots in France now are ethnic-based, just like the BLM riots here in America. It is difficult to fathom there would be riots in France now had Macron not been a globalist open borders guy like Biden. I suppose the Muslims there would call dissenters to open borders French Nationalist, racist nazis.
I am not so sure he is. He is a highly intelligent individual. I believe he got in on his merits.
Oh, WAIT! He's black but a conservative so he's a bad man.
The riots in France now prove you wrong and the airplane movie is right.
As cop cars are being burned, buildings burned, and riots in the streets, Macron has to call in 40,000 more troops because a Muslim who would've killed a cop was himself killed, and the riots are BY Muslims who invaded France because of Macron's globalist policies and NOT being a Nationalist, the left says:
"There's nothing to see here, folks. Run along now. Nothing to see HERE!"
You never saw the Airplane movie? There is a scene that perfectly depicts the New Modern Democrats. Airplanes are crashing all over, falling from the sky. Buildings are on fire, and cars exploding. People running around frantically. The police are trying to maintain order and keep people away. A crowd starts to gather and the lead detective tries to keep them from pushing through the perimeter as they crane their necks to get a better and closer look. He tells them"Clarence Thomas has said on multiple occasions that he is a product of affirmative action.
Airplane movie????????
Oh, and the French far right is as shot full of bigotry and the American right is, and has the same pseudo fascist flirtations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?