- Joined
- Aug 3, 2018
- Messages
- 34,752
- Reaction score
- 3,961
- Location
- north carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
What was the big news from the latest Senate Intelligence Report? That Trump associates may have conspired with some Russians to do something vague which may or may not have helped Trump in the 2016 election? Maybe, but that is not the big news, which is that
There is no hard evidence that Russians hacked the DNC computers and delivered stolen e-mails to Wikileaks.
Here is what Mueller alleged in his report: "Between May 25,2016, and June 1, 2016, GRU officers accessed the DNC's mail server from a GRU-controlled computer leased inside the US," the report, released on April 18, 2019, stated, referencing the acronym for one of Russia's spy agencies. "During these connections, Unit 26165 officers appear to have stolen thousands of emails and attachments, which were later released by WikiLeaks in July 2016."
Despite relying heavily on the Mueller report, the fifth volume of the report by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) doesn't feature any of the details from the specific claim by the special counsel. The late May time frame alleged by Mueller is entirely absent from the committee's 20-page timeline of the DNC hack. Instead, the SSCI report includes a single vague sentence, as part of an undated timeline entry that mentions neither emails nor hacking.
"Henry testified that CrowdStrike was 'able to see some exfiltration and the types of files that had been touched' but not the content of those files," the Aug. 18 report says, citing the committee's interview with Shawn Henry, the head of the team from cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which the DNC brought in to handle the breach on April 30, 2016. ...
CrowdStrike's official timeline of the DNC event likewise omits the hack that Mueller alleged to have taken place on or about May 25 to June 1, 2016. The cybersecurity firm claims that no hack occurred.''"There is no indication of any subsequent breaches taking place on the DNC's corporate network or on any machines protected by CrowdStrike Falcon," the company told Epoch Times."
The Epoch Times, Wednesday, August 26, 2020.
There you have it, folks. CrowdStrike investigated the rumored hacking and found no hacking occurred. That makes it appear that attempts to ignore Seth Rich and the possible in-house theft of the emails as suggested by Julian Assange, was an unwise tack to take.
There is no hard evidence that Russians hacked the DNC computers and delivered stolen e-mails to Wikileaks.
Here is what Mueller alleged in his report: "Between May 25,2016, and June 1, 2016, GRU officers accessed the DNC's mail server from a GRU-controlled computer leased inside the US," the report, released on April 18, 2019, stated, referencing the acronym for one of Russia's spy agencies. "During these connections, Unit 26165 officers appear to have stolen thousands of emails and attachments, which were later released by WikiLeaks in July 2016."
Despite relying heavily on the Mueller report, the fifth volume of the report by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) doesn't feature any of the details from the specific claim by the special counsel. The late May time frame alleged by Mueller is entirely absent from the committee's 20-page timeline of the DNC hack. Instead, the SSCI report includes a single vague sentence, as part of an undated timeline entry that mentions neither emails nor hacking.
"Henry testified that CrowdStrike was 'able to see some exfiltration and the types of files that had been touched' but not the content of those files," the Aug. 18 report says, citing the committee's interview with Shawn Henry, the head of the team from cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which the DNC brought in to handle the breach on April 30, 2016. ...
CrowdStrike's official timeline of the DNC event likewise omits the hack that Mueller alleged to have taken place on or about May 25 to June 1, 2016. The cybersecurity firm claims that no hack occurred.''"There is no indication of any subsequent breaches taking place on the DNC's corporate network or on any machines protected by CrowdStrike Falcon," the company told Epoch Times."
The Epoch Times, Wednesday, August 26, 2020.
There you have it, folks. CrowdStrike investigated the rumored hacking and found no hacking occurred. That makes it appear that attempts to ignore Seth Rich and the possible in-house theft of the emails as suggested by Julian Assange, was an unwise tack to take.