- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 66,431
- Reaction score
- 47,469
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
thanks for exposing the hypocrisy so vividly. if one side views the posts of the other to be a "joke", that is fine ... at least until the table is turnedGreat opening to foster reasoned debate. I bet you are a real hoot in person. :roll:
for the record, i cannot recall seeing anything posted by you which would be properly classified "reasoned debate". partisan, unfounded garbage, yes. reasoned debate ... still waiting on that. and you probably would not enjoy my company in person as i do not suffer fools gladly
it is clear you haven't an iota of understanding about this topic. it is not about handouts. it IS about paying back what was taken. many billions. and this huge amount represents only what was not addressed because of the statute of limitations. imagine how much was actually stolen from the IndiansWe should do what we can to help the NA tribes that are mired in abject poverty through development, and schools to help them succeed in this country. Money handouts is NOT the answer. Teach a man to fish.
you clearly don't know the dealYeah, tell that to someone who doesn't know the deal pal...."Pigford v. Glickman: 86,000 claims from 39,697 total farmers?"
Zombie » Pigford v. Glickman: 86,000 claims from 39,697 total farmers?
j-mac
you want us to believe that any party to a suit is limited to a single claim
come back when you actually have a point to argue
your lame ass, unfounded, fact deprived assertions are getting old