• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sen Schumer, Rep Pelosi, Sen Sanders, Rep AO Cortez = it is time to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law all charges that come up

Razoo

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Messages
24,476
Reaction score
7,808
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
People want all charges prosecuted. Not just one or two ....... all charges. Since Watergate every republican admin has had many crimes committed. "Going easy" has not proved as a deterrent..

It's time to act accordingly.
 
I suggest they present their evidence to the DOJ and wait for their action.

Anything else...such as making their claims in this lawsuit against Eastman...is nothing more than political narrative building.

Of course, everyone (but the useful idiots) knows that narrative building is the sole purpose of this dog and pony show.
 
I suggest they present their evidence to the DOJ and wait for their action.

Anything else...such as making their claims in this lawsuit against Eastman...is nothing more than political narrative building.

Of course, everyone (but the useful idiots) knows that narrative building is the sole purpose of this dog and pony show.
No. They're still building the case, investigating as is their job.
 
I suggest they present their evidence to the DOJ and wait for their action.
Anything else...such as making their claims in this lawsuit against Eastman...is nothing more than political narrative building.
Of course, everyone (but the useful idiots) knows that narrative building is the sole purpose of this dog and pony show.

So you're saying this is like the Hunter Biden bullshit and Uranium One and all the crap about Hillary?
 

Trump also needs to be charged by the Justice Dept for his phone call to GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. I don't know what the hell Garland is waiting for.
 
I suggest anyone doing investigations and prosecutions into the cult leader have protection because you never know what the cult is gonna do.
 
I suggest they present their evidence to the DOJ and wait for their action.

Anything else...such as making their claims in this lawsuit against Eastman...is nothing more than political narrative building.

Of course, everyone (but the useful idiots) knows that narrative building is the sole purpose of this dog and pony show.
The narrative was already built by the criminal actions of Eastman and Trump.

The Democrats and the country thanks both of them for making prosecution of these traitors easier.
 
I suggest they present their evidence to the DOJ and wait for their action.

Anything else...such as making their claims in this lawsuit against Eastman...is nothing more than political narrative building.

Of course, everyone (but the useful idiots) knows that narrative building is the sole purpose of this dog and pony show.

According to Adam Schiff, the court asked the Jan. 6 Committee if the crime-fraud exception applied to the 'executive privilege' claim made by Eastman. So the Committee was not just throwing this information into the court filing to get it to the public, but was using the information to support the crime-fraud exception to Eastman's claim of executive privilege.
 
Let's see, isn't this committee made up largely of democrats and aren't a good number of these democrats the same persons that were the democrats impeachment managers? Aren't these folks also a large portion of the most vocal democrats who claimed they had the goods on Trump Colluding with Russia? So I hardly feel that anything coming our of this committee can be trusted as truth.
 
As I recall, you libruls made similar claims multiple times through out the Mueller Investigation. I'll buy the popcorn.
 
So you're saying this is like the Hunter Biden bullshit and Uranium One and all the crap about Hillary?
I didn't say anything about Hunter Biden, Uranium One or Hillary.

If you aren't clear about what I'm saying, try reading what I wrote...slower.
 
According to Adam Schiff, the court asked the Jan. 6 Committee if the crime-fraud exception applied to the 'executive privilege' claim made by Eastman. So the Committee was not just throwing this information into the court filing to get it to the public, but was using the information to support the crime-fraud exception to Eastman's claim of executive privilege.
Yeah. They might be able to convince a judge to rule in their favor by making unsupported claims about imaginary criminal action.

Hey...if they have evidence of criminal action, why do they need a judge to rule in their favor? They supposedly already have what they need...right?

Maybe it would work if they have already proven some kind of criminal action...but they haven't. And they won't.

Sorry...they know all this stuff. As I said, it's all about the narrative.
 
People want all charges prosecuted. Not just one or two ....... all charges. Since Watergate every republican admin has had many crimes committed. "Going easy" has not proved as a deterrent..

It's time to act accordingly.

They only say this stuff so rubes keep sending them money.

Call me when the trial starts.
 
Article 1. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to preserve,pecial counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s presentation last week, although it contained no new information, has renewed pressure to impeach President Trump. You can debate whether impeachment makes sense politically, but there is no doubt that it is justified legally and morally. There is alread protect and defend the Constitution, and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has obstructed the administration of justice:

1. He attempted to fire Mueller. The Mueller report found “substantial evidence . . . that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct.”

2. Trump attempted to curtail Mueller’s investigation. Mueller found “that the President’s effort to have [Attorney General Jeff] Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel’s investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.”

3. He ordered White House counsel Donald McGahn to falsify the record to conceal his attempts to fire Mueller. Mueller found that Trump “acted . . . in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny of the President’s conduct.”

4. He fired FBI Director James B. Comey, Mueller found, because of “Comey’s unwillingness to publicly state that the President was not personally under investigation.” Moreover, Mueller wrote, by firing Comey “the President wanted to protect himself from an investigation into his campaign,” because he knew “that a thorough FBI investigation would uncover facts about the campaign and the President personally that the President could have understood to be crimes or that would give rise to personal and political concerns.” Trump showed awareness of guilt by advancing “a pretextual reason to the press and the public for Comey’s termination.”

5. He trieoger Stone, and other e Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Rent. The non-cooperation of Manafort and Stone, in part witnesses from cooperating with the governmd to dissuadicular, made it impossible to establish the exact nature of the relationship between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

Article II. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, failed to defend America from foreign election interference. As a candidate, he welcomed Russian intervention in the 2016 election and refused to notify the proper authorities of contacts between his campaign and representatives of Russia and WikiLeaks. As president, he denied that the Russian attack had even occurred, accepted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s false denials of responsibility, and showed no interest in determining the full scale of the attack. He repeatedly called the Russia investigation a “hoax” and a “witch hunt” even though Mueller determined “that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election” and that “the matters we investigated were of paramount importance.”


Article III. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, attempted to investigate and prosecute his political opponents. On three occasions, Mueller found, Trump asked the Justice Department to initiate investigations of Hillary Clinton. More recently, Trump and his attorney, R.udolph W. Giuliani, attempted to initiate an investigation of Joe Biden
 
Article IV. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, failed to produce papers and testimony as duly directed by Congress. Trump obstructed at least 20 inquiries relating to his taxes, business records, the Mueller investigation and other matters.

Article V. Donald J. Trump, in violation of federal campaign finance laws, conspired with his attorney Michael Cohen in order to conceal alleged relationships with adult film actress Stormy Daniels and Playboy playmate Karen McDougal before the 2016 election.


Article VI. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to uphold Article 1, section 9 of the Constitution (“No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law”), attempted to misuse his emergency powers to spend funds on a border wall that Congress did not appropriate.


Article VII. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to uphold the emoluments clauses (which forbid the president from accepting benefits from foreign and state governments without the permission of Congress) retains ownership of a global business empire which allows him to benefit from dealings with foreign and state governments.

That Trump is guilty of these offenses – and more – is not necessarily an argument for moving forward with impeachment. That could backfire politically if it results, as it surely would, in a failure to convict by the Republican-controlled Senate.

But don’t pretend, as do 249 out of 250 Republican members of Congress, that there is insufficient evidence to even open an impeachment inquiry. Trump has committed more criminal and unconstitutional conduct than any previous president in U.S. history. If they refuse to impeach him, members of Congress will violate their own oaths to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
 
I suggest they present their evidence to the DOJ and wait for their action.

Anything else...such as making their claims in this lawsuit against Eastman...is nothing more than political narrative building.

Of course, everyone (but the useful idiots) knows that narrative building is the sole purpose of this dog and pony show.
The narrative cannot crescendo just yet. They'll wait to do that until just before the midterm elections.
 
Article 1. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to preserve,pecial counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s presentation last week, although it contained no new information, has renewed pressure to impeach President Trump. You can debate whether impeachment makes sense politically, but there is no doubt that it is justified legally and morally. There is alread protect and defend the Constitution, and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has obstructed the administration of justice:

1. He attempted to fire Mueller. The Mueller report found “substantial evidence . . . that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct.”

2. Trump attempted to curtail Mueller’s investigation. Mueller found “that the President’s effort to have [Attorney General Jeff] Sessions limit the scope of the Special Counsel’s investigation to future election interference was intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.”

3. He ordered White House counsel Donald McGahn to falsify the record to conceal his attempts to fire Mueller. Mueller found that Trump “acted . . . in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny of the President’s conduct.”

4. He fired FBI Director James B. Comey, Mueller found, because of “Comey’s unwillingness to publicly state that the President was not personally under investigation.” Moreover, Mueller wrote, by firing Comey “the President wanted to protect himself from an investigation into his campaign,” because he knew “that a thorough FBI investigation would uncover facts about the campaign and the President personally that the President could have understood to be crimes or that would give rise to personal and political concerns.” Trump showed awareness of guilt by advancing “a pretextual reason to the press and the public for Comey’s termination.”

5. He trieoger Stone, and other e Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Rent. The non-cooperation of Manafort and Stone, in part witnesses from cooperating with the governmd to dissuadicular, made it impossible to establish the exact nature of the relationship between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

Article II. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, failed to defend America from foreign election interference. As a candidate, he welcomed Russian intervention in the 2016 election and refused to notify the proper authorities of contacts between his campaign and representatives of Russia and WikiLeaks. As president, he denied that the Russian attack had even occurred, accepted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s false denials of responsibility, and showed no interest in determining the full scale of the attack. He repeatedly called the Russia investigation a “hoax” and a “witch hunt” even though Mueller determined “that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election” and that “the matters we investigated were of paramount importance.”


Article III. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, attempted to investigate and prosecute his political opponents. On three occasions, Mueller found, Trump asked the Justice Department to initiate investigations of Hillary Clinton. More recently, Trump and his attorney, R.udolph W. Giuliani, attempted to initiate an investigation of Joe Biden
Haven't you heard. The Mueller investigation was based on a make believe dossier paid for by the Hillary campaign. 3 indictments have already come down. A Hillary lawyer, a DOJ member, a Russian national. My god, how you cling to the Collusion lie that isn't true. But when that's all you got, that's all you got.
 
1646359120986.png

Here we go !

Of course, if Trump ever needed a lawyer to defend himself, he could pay for it using the rent he's saved living the heads of the left.
 
Article IV. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, and to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, failed to produce papers and testimony as duly directed by Congress. Trump obstructed at least 20 inquiries relating to his taxes, business records, the Mueller investigation and other matters.

Article V. Donald J. Trump, in violation of federal campaign finance laws, conspired with his attorney Michael Cohen in order to conceal alleged relationships with adult film actress Stormy Daniels and Playboy playmate Karen McDougal before the 2016 election.


Article VI. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to uphold Article 1, section 9 of the Constitution (“No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law”), attempted to misuse his emergency powers to spend funds on a border wall that Congress did not appropriate.


Article VII. Donald J. Trump, in violation of his oath to uphold the emoluments clauses (which forbid the president from accepting benefits from foreign and state governments without the permission of Congress) retains ownership of a global business empire which allows him to benefit from dealings with foreign and state governments.

That Trump is guilty of these offenses – and more – is not necessarily an argument for moving forward with impeachment. That could backfire politically if it results, as it surely would, in a failure to convict by the Republican-controlled Senate.

But don’t pretend, as do 249 out of 250 Republican members of Congress, that there is insufficient evidence to even open an impeachment inquiry. Trump has committed more criminal and unconstitutional conduct than any previous president in U.S. history. If they refuse to impeach him, members of Congress will violate their own oaths to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Fake News.
 
I didn't say anything about Hunter Biden, Uranium One or Hillary.

If you aren't clear about what I'm saying, try reading what I wrote...slower.

Hunter Biden bullshit and Uranium One and all the crap about Hillary = narrative building is the sole purpose of this dog and pony show

yes?
 
Hunter Biden bullshit and Uranium One and all the crap about Hillary = narrative building is the sole purpose of this dog and pony show

yes?
???

What does all that have to do with the 1/6 nonsense?
 
Yeah. They might be able to convince a judge to rule in their favor by making unsupported claims about imaginary criminal action.

Hey...if they have evidence of criminal action, why do they need a judge to rule in their favor? They supposedly already have what they need...right?

Maybe it would work if they have already proven some kind of criminal action...but they haven't. And they won't.

Sorry...they know all this stuff. As I said, it's all about the narrative.
You don't seem to understand the context here. (1) The Committee is trying to get Eastman's documents. (2) Eastman is claiming 'executive privilege'. (3) The court asked the Committee if the crime/fraud exception applied here (i.e. executive privilege does not apply if a crime or fraud has been committed). (4) The Committee provided information that a crime or fraud may have been committed - and stated the statute.

So, they are not trying Trump here. They are trying to get Eastman's documents.
 
Back
Top Bottom