• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Segregate them (1 Viewer)

Seperation for White Haters

  • Whites have no right to equal treatment, (i.e. no homeland for honkeys), only jews with israel, etc.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Whites already inhabit less than 8% of the worlds population, what more do they want?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .

Whip

Banned
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
If Japanese, Chinese, Israelis, Mexicans, and others can have their own countries, states or what have you, is it wrong for people of the White race to have their own? If people of the jewish race/religion, the peoples of the japanese or chinese race, and others have their own lands, then why shouldn't Whites have a land of their own? Suppose we allowed White, cracker, honkey, peckerwood, racist, klansmen, Nazis and the like to have their own piece of the world? Wouldn't nonracist be safer from hate crimes and racism? Knowing that Whites are the biggest haters in the world, shouldn't we put them in one little area where they can be easily controlled or dusted if they get out of line? I'm not talking about all Whites, just those who wish to be segregated from other races. Wouldn't that be cool, to seperate them from the herd?
 
Whip said:
If Japanese, Chinese, Israelis, Mexicans, and others can have their own countries, states or what have you, is it wrong for people of the White race to have their own? If people of the jewish race/religion, the peoples of the japanese or chinese race, and others have their own lands, then why shouldn't Whites have a land of their own? Suppose we allowed White, cracker, honkey, peckerwood, racist, klansmen, Nazis and the like to have their own piece of the world? Wouldn't nonracist be safer from hate crimes and racism? Knowing that Whites are the biggest haters in the world, shouldn't we put them in one little area where they can be easily controlled or dusted if they get out of line? I'm not talking about all Whites, just those who wish to be segregated from other races. Wouldn't that be cool, to seperate them from the herd?

If you want to be your own country, you can have de facto independence. Just move to some remote part of the country with all of your ignorant friends and buy some land. You WILL be "easily controlled or dusted if (you) get out of line." And as long as you don't, you've nothing to worry about. But you will. And I'll take great pleasure in watching the FBI take you down on television.
 
I think you will just have to get over the fact that we are a multi-cultural society and it will always be that way. If you want an country of almost 100% white people, 1) your head is much to far up your ***, and 2) go to Europe.
 
Whip said:
If Japanese, Chinese, Israelis, Mexicans, and others can have their own countries, states or what have you, is it wrong for people of the White race to have their own? If people of the jewish race/religion, the peoples of the japanese or chinese race, and others have their own lands, then why shouldn't Whites have a land of their own? Suppose we allowed White, cracker, honkey, peckerwood, racist, klansmen, Nazis and the like to have their own piece of the world? Wouldn't nonracist be safer from hate crimes and racism? Knowing that Whites are the biggest haters in the world, shouldn't we put them in one little area where they can be easily controlled or dusted if they get out of line? I'm not talking about all Whites, just those who wish to be segregated from other races. Wouldn't that be cool, to seperate them from the herd?

if you dont like living among other races you can move somewhere that has very few minorities, or become a hermit.

and to suggest that the japonese, chinese, israelis, and mexicans each have only one race shows extreme ignorance.
 
Define 'White'.
 
Whip said:
If Japanese, Chinese, Israelis, Mexicans, and others can have their own countries, states or what have you, is it wrong for people of the White race to have their own? If people of the jewish race/religion, the peoples of the japanese or chinese race, and others have their own lands, then why shouldn't Whites have a land of their own? Suppose we allowed White, cracker, honkey, peckerwood, racist, klansmen, Nazis and the like to have their own piece of the world? Wouldn't nonracist be safer from hate crimes and racism? Knowing that Whites are the biggest haters in the world, shouldn't we put them in one little area where they can be easily controlled or dusted if they get out of line? I'm not talking about all Whites, just those who wish to be segregated from other races. Wouldn't that be cool, to seperate them from the herd?


Are you are talking about shipping and the inbred sister ****ing hillbilly racist out of this country? That sounds alright send them to the middle of some **** hole middle eastern country,it can be like a inbred sister ****ing hillbilly racist reserve complete with trailer trash trailer parks and white trash tv show guest for jerry springer.
 
Last edited:
You all forgot to vote.

Alec, this aint about multiculteral societies. This is about should white folks have the same options as other races? Cute t shirt. You wear that at all of your daughters weddings? Or is that reserved for Sunday pumping at the septic tanks?

And, kandyassaluga or whatever your name is, the question is should white folks be allowed to go away and live among themselves without worry that the FBI or the ATF or some other alphabet soup government organization is going to kill them for it. We can always aim US and Israeli nukes at them to keep them under control. The ones not aimed at Iran any hows.
 
Whip said:
. This is about should white folks have the same options as other races? Cute t shirt.

YOu make it sound like they got together and thought to themselves that they needed their own country.I really do not think all the chinese got together and said "Hey we should have our own damn country".
 
and to suggest that the japonese, chinese, israelis, and mexicans each have only one race shows extreme ignorance.
Now, star, dam it. We're talkin about who controls the governments and the in and outs of such. Now, why the heck didn't you vote? Should crackers who want to be away from all you love everyone folk have that right? You know dang well they should and that is why you didn't vote. If I aint right about these people having their own lands then please let me know how so.

Define 'White'.
I aint gonna define 'White'. The question was easy enough to understand. But if it makes you feel better, let's do it this way. White is anyone who considers themselves White and wants a homeland of their own not mixed with racist that they don't consider 'White'. Cool for you? Works for me.

jamesrage you aint a nice person and you forgot to vote to.
 
jamesrage said:
YOu make it sound like they got together and thought to themselves that they needed their own country.I really do not think all the chinese got together and said "Hey we should have our own damn country".
No I didn't. Just said they have that option, why don't whitey? Don't forget to vote.
 
Whip said:
If Japanese, Chinese, Israelis, Mexicans, and others can have their own countries, states or what have you, is it wrong for people of the White race to have their own? If people of the jewish race/religion, the peoples of the japanese or chinese race, and others have their own lands, then why shouldn't Whites have a land of their own? Suppose we allowed White, cracker, honkey, peckerwood, racist, klansmen, Nazis and the like to have their own piece of the world? Wouldn't nonracist be safer from hate crimes and racism? Knowing that Whites are the biggest haters in the world, shouldn't we put them in one little area where they can be easily controlled or dusted if they get out of line? I'm not talking about all Whites, just those who wish to be segregated from other races. Wouldn't that be cool, to seperate them from the herd?
So far, I am the only voter and am running 100%. Where is all them folks who hate Whites having seperation from everyone else? I like 100%.
 
Whip said:
You all forgot to vote.

I think people didn't vote because they can see through you to your agenda. You seem to be attempting to incite some sort of basement-worthy debate where you take the side of a white separtist (racist). You seem eerily reminicent of other posters from certain other message boards.

Alec, this aint about multiculteral societies. This is about should white folks have the same options as other races? Cute t shirt. You wear that at all of your daughters weddings? Or is that reserved for Sunday pumping at the septic tanks?

And, kandyassaluga or whatever your name is, the question is should white folks be allowed to go away and live among themselves without worry that the FBI or the ATF or some other alphabet soup government organization is going to kill them for it. We can always aim US and Israeli nukes at them to keep them under control. The ones not aimed at Iran any hows.

You do realize that insulting other posters makes your already weak arguments seem weaker, don't you?
 
Whip said:
I aint gonna define 'White'. The question was easy enough to understand. But if it makes you feel better, let's do it this way. White is anyone who considers themselves White and wants a homeland of their own not mixed with racist that they don't consider 'White'. Cool for you? Works for me.

Sorry, way too vauge and way too subjective. In order to get reasonable responses, you must define your terms objectively. Unless, of course, you're just spounting an agenda.
 
Whip said:
No I didn't. Just said they have that option, why don't whitey? Don't forget to vote.
The last time I checked not everyone living in China is chinese decent,nor is everone living in Japan japanese decent and so on.
 
Capnt, there aint a damn thing weak about me or my arguement. What is weak is your knowed and showed cowardice. You couldn't hold a debate with a teacup. you got nothing but name calling bull squirts going on for you, and they couldn't impregnatate a kettle of fish.

I defined white for this topic. Works good for everyone else. Don't for you because you want to change the subject. Heres the real deal, yankee. I aint trying to take the side of noone. I just ask is White folks should have a land of their own if they wanted it. Not complicated. Not hatefull. Just a for real deal question. You agree that they should, don't you? If not you would have done polled on it.

Hows about we just take all white people who want to be left among their own and kill them? That's a good idea. Don't you think? No more dissent from them cracker, racist, whiteys. **** yeah. I can see the rivers of blood now, in my minds eye. Can't you? Aint it pretty?

Jamesrage, get off the weed and read what you are replying to. We aren't talking inhabitants in them countries, we are talking control of them.
 
Whip said:
Capnt, there aint a damn thing weak about me or my arguement. What is weak is your knowed and showed cowardice. You couldn't hold a debate with a teacup. you got nothing but name calling bull squirts going on for you, and they couldn't impregnatate a kettle of fish.

More irrelevant insults. Your defensiveness shows your weakness. You have shown nothing in the way of supporting your own position on the poll and, therefore have brought nothing to the debate you started other than insulting anyone that questions or disagrees with you. I don't know about where you come from, but where I come from, that's pretty poor debating.

I defined white for this topic. Works good for everyone else.

If it works good for everyone else, then why do you think that NO ONE HAS VOTED? I mean other than the fact that your poll options reek of bigotry and people here are smart enough to see that.

Don't for you because you want to change the subject.

Not trying to change the subject. Just trying to get you to clarify it.

Heres the real deal, yankee. I aint trying to take the side of noone. I just ask is White folks should have a land of their own if they wanted it. Not complicated. Not hatefull. Just a for real deal question. You agree that they should, don't you? If not you would have done polled on it.

I didn't poll on it because you didn't define the term 'white', and I suspect that you have an ulterior motive here. Spewing white separatist rhetoric. If you truly wanted to discuss this, reasonably, your poll options wouldn't have sounded as bigotted as they were, with obvious tongue in cheek anti-white comments.

Hows about we just take all white people who want to be left among their own and kill them? That's a good idea. Don't you think? No more dissent from them cracker, racist, whiteys. **** yeah. I can see the rivers of blood now, in my minds eye. Can't you? Aint it pretty?

Simmer down. It's the internet.

Jamesrage, get off the weed and read what you are replying to. We aren't talking inhabitants in them countries, we are talking control of them.

I'm sure that jamesrage can adequately defend himself, so rather than responding myself, I'll let him. I've already stated several times how your insults are presenting your arguments.
 
Sir_Alec said:
I think you will just have to get over the fact that we are a multi-cultural society and it will always be that way. If you want an country of almost 100% white people, 1) your head is much to far up your ***, and 2) go to Europe.

***Whip makes a very good point in isolating people to their own race. How much racial tension do you think there is up in Iceland, or say in Alaska? I would never think of moving from my lily white neighborhood to take up residence in the heart of Harlem. Hey Whip, you may want to peruse the segregationist site over at Stormfront. Hope to see you there.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
Define 'White'.

***As white as the sheets on my head...oh excuse me, I meant to say bed.
 
Originally posted by pstdkid:
As white as the sheets on my head...oh excuse me, I meant to say bed.
Speaking of bed, are you telling me
you wouldn't tap that a.s.s if you could?
If you say no, your either gay, or your lying.

picture001ar4.jpg
 
I also refuse to vote.......as its a pointless list of options intent only on inflaming and degrading. That said....If those who find White Pride a viable option wish to migrate to a new land and start a Government of isolationism, please do. But this country is already taken.
 
well, there are a few countries where I think there are only whites.. antartica and greenland. but seriously the time for isolation and segregation has long since past. no one is making whites live where they live and likewise no one is making minorities, etc live where they live, except of course money. lol. i didnt vote as the what option i wanted was not offered and the ones that were offered where rather one sided.
 
Billo_Really said:
Speaking of bed, are you telling me
you wouldn't tap that a.s.s if you could?
If you say no, your either gay, or your lying.

picture001ar4.jpg


***Is that gal from N.Y.City? She looks like one I paid $20 for last year.
 
Kandahar said:
Just move to some remote part of the country with all of your ignorant friends and buy some land. You WILL be "easily controlled or dusted if (you) get out of line." And as long as you don't, you've nothing to worry about. But you will. And I'll take great pleasure in watching the FBI take you down on television.

I vote for this option. :lol:
 
Whip said:
If Japanese,

Nationality, not race...

Whip said:

Nationality, not race...

Whip said:
Israelis,

Nationality, not race...

Whip said:
Mexicans,

Nationality, not race...

Whip said:
and others can have their own countries, states or what have you, is it wrong for people of the White race to have their own?

Well, up until you mentioned caucasians, you hadn't said anything about race, just nationality.

So, it looks like you don't really know what you're talking about.

Whip said:
If people of the jewish race/religion, the peoples of the japanese or chinese race, and others have their own lands, then why shouldn't Whites have a land of their own?

Why? Again, your examples were nationalities, not races.

If you want to make a point by way of comparison, then you should try to make a valid comparison.

Whip said:
Suppose we allowed White, cracker, honkey, peckerwood,

Side note: these three earned you the honor of having your post reported for the use of racial epithets.

Whip said:
racist, klansmen, Nazis and the like to have their own piece of the world? Wouldn't nonracist be safer from hate crimes and racism?

Only if you propose to isolate them and allow them no contact with anyone outside of their own little world.

Whip said:
Knowing that Whites are the biggest haters in the world,

Care to prove this? Or is this just another racist comment (albeit, I'm assuming, reverse racism)?

Whip said:
shouldn't we put them in one little area where they can be easily controlled or dusted if they get out of line? I'm not talking about all Whites, just those who wish to be segregated from other races. Wouldn't that be cool, to seperate them from the herd?

Now, it almost sounds like you're advocating forcing people with certain views to live apart.

So, it looks like you've gone from confusing race and nationality to confusing race with opinion.

Maybe you should try again when you figure out what you actually want to be talking about...
 
ptsdkid said:
***Is that gal from N.Y.City? She looks like one I paid $20 for last year.

Maybe if you weren't a racist pig, you wouldn't have to pay for sex.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom