- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 12,177
- Reaction score
- 7,551
- Location
- Ft. Campbell, KY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I have an huge amount of respect for this man, there's no one I can think better to lead the DoD. What he's proposing is a preemptive cut in DoD spending to both cut the fat off the military and the rest of the DoD, as that will eventually happen as these wars come to an end, while it can still be toned down progressively as opposed to Congress simply slashing the budget wholesale in one year.
Cutting the fat will also remove unneeded programs as well as overlapping command structures and other general wastefulness. Problem is military contracts and facilities are also big money makers for Congressmen's districts, they bring money and jobs into places which very well might need them. However regardless its causing our military to become pretty inefficient in some areas and downright wasteful in others. Its not a huge program, but the DoD as enough money to do its job at the moment and could use with a little more freedom in spending its budget in my opinion. But if we keep getting fatter then that money has to be spent somewhere, and odds are it'll simply be wasted because its been mandated that the DoD spend it.
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=59082
I'm all for government fiscal responsibility and that includes the military.
Cutting the fat will also remove unneeded programs as well as overlapping command structures and other general wastefulness. Problem is military contracts and facilities are also big money makers for Congressmen's districts, they bring money and jobs into places which very well might need them. However regardless its causing our military to become pretty inefficient in some areas and downright wasteful in others. Its not a huge program, but the DoD as enough money to do its job at the moment and could use with a little more freedom in spending its budget in my opinion. But if we keep getting fatter then that money has to be spent somewhere, and odds are it'll simply be wasted because its been mandated that the DoD spend it.
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=59082
“For example, should we really be up in arms over a temporary projected shortfall of about 100 Navy and Marine strike fighters relative to the number of carrier wings, when America’s military possesses more than 3,200 tactical combat aircraft of all kinds?” he asked.
“Does the number of warships we have and are building really put America at risk when the U.S. battle fleet is larger than the next 13 navies combined, 11 of which belong to allies and partners? Is it a dire threat that by 2020 the United States will have only 20 times more advanced stealth fighters than China?”
I'm all for government fiscal responsibility and that includes the military.