• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sea ice extent falls to new record low

Not only not melting but getting thicker from below as well as from any snowfall that lands on it.

Looks like the cooling sun may be starting to show its effects. It's also possible this is the normal action, and as the shelf becomes more rigid, it breaks.

For you believers of the AGW dogma... Keep in mind we still don't know with any scientific certainty, the effects of all the significant variables.
 

One day it will have winds on it that will eiter make it break up or float away. Then the process will start again. It may well be in tens of thousands of years.
 
The Chukchi Sea abuts the Bering Sea via the Bering Strait. The Chukchi is not irrelevant to the Bering.

Jesus.

You don’t even read your links that you spam, do you?

Now I see why you just cut and paste...because you have no context to add.

The graph I posted was about the ice in 2018.

You posted an irrelevant paleoclimate study.

WTF?
 
Last edited:
Jesus.

You don’t even read your links that you spam, do you?

Now I see why you just cut and paste...because you have no context to add.

The graph I posted was about the ice in 2018.

You posted an irrelevant paleoclimate study.

WTF?

That's because the several paleo studies show that what's happening now isn't important, or even significant.

". . . Earlier this year, Stein et al., 2017 published a reconstruction of Arctic sea ice variations throughout the Holocene that appeared to establish that there is more Arctic sea ice now than for nearly all of the last 10,000 years.
The study region, the Chukchi Sea, was deemed representative of most of the Arctic, as the authors asserted that “the increase in sea ice extent during the late Holocene seems to be a circum-Arctic phenomenon as PIP25-based sea ice records from the Fram Strait, Laptev Sea, East Siberian Sea and Chukchi Sea display a generally quite similar evolution, all coinciding with the decrease in solar radiation.” . . ."

And:

". . . Within the last month, two more papers have been published that further affirm the conclusion that modern Arctic sea ice extent has not changed significantly relative to even the last few centuries, nor has it fallen outside the range of natural variability. . . ."
 

Yet...



And non-denier publications have, not surprisingly, a different interpretation than your scammy blogs.

Arctic sea ice outlook at worst point in 125,000 years | Cosmos
 
Last edited:
And why is the arctic ice so astonishingly low?

It’s the warmest winter ever recorded in the Arctic.

Truly amazing, and it was all accurately predicted decades ago.

 
And why is the arctic ice so astonishingly low?

It’s the warmest winter ever recorded in the Arctic.

Truly amazing, and it was all accurately predicted decades ago.

Well, that's all obviously fake news since someone reported seeing a snowball in Washington DC!
 
Well, that’s... irrelevant.

I sure hope someone is paying you to spam denier blog posts, because otherwise...it would be pretty sad.

He posted the published science paper with a link, you sneer at it.

Your comment was dead on arrival.............
 
Wow the dead on arrival comments are really bad. They even sneer at peer reviewed science papers now......


Then Dr. Meier is then wrong when he says there were little to no summer ice for long periods of time"


LINK

or,

Arctic Ocean perennial sea ice breakdown during the Early Holocene Insolation Maximum



LINK


or,

Birds and Climatic Change

LINK

or,

New insights on Arctic Quaternary climate variability from palaeo-records and numerical modelling

LINK

or,

The dynamic Arctic

LINK
 

Bwahahahahahahahahaha!

Your link has NOTHING to do with Arctic ice, but about habitat on LAND areas far from the polar region.

You post a short term sea ice cover chart, while Jack posted actual science papers about long term sea ice changes.

It obviously flew right over your head.
 

As I noted, Einstein...it’s just about as relevant.
 
As I noted, Einstein...it’s just about as relevant.

No Jack and YOU stayed on the sea ice topic, Your beaver deflection was not about sea ice at all.

You forgot something?
 
It is clear Threegoofs has no answer to post 39

LINK

You deflected nothing more.
 
If you were making a point, you might want to..make a point.

The point is obvious, but that would mean you would have to acknowledge that the mantra, "Sea ice extent falls to new record low" is clearly false.

Surely you can't be that clueless....?
 

3goofs get my nomination as the person here who has done and continues to do the most to further the Skeptic's side arguments. Bit like Hitler being the general in WWII who did most for the Allied cause.
 
The point is obvious, but that would mean you would have to acknowledge that the mantra, "Sea ice extent falls to new record low" is clearly false.

Surely you can't be that clueless....?

Oh, he can be!
 
The point is obvious, but that would mean you would have to acknowledge that the mantra, "Sea ice extent falls to new record low" is clearly false.

Surely you can't be that clueless....?

Again, you might want to make a point.

Sea Ice is clearly at a record low in the observational record. I suppose during the Carboniferous, sea ice didn’t exist.

Not sure why that’s relevant.
 
Again, you might want to make a point.

Sea Ice is clearly at a record low in the observational record. I suppose during the Carboniferous, sea ice didn’t exist.

Not sure why that’s relevant.

It is clear you are not here to have an honest debate, just deflect or not even try to see the obvious point I made that others here already understood.

By the way ALL those links you didn't Perouse was about THIS interglacial period, which showed there were a lot less to NO summer ice in the Arctic region than now which lasted a few THOUSAND years. The last time it was like that was during the MWP.

That was the obvious you keep fighting against.

So you can be that little child Linus hanging onto a 4 decade sea ice record blanket, which actually started in 1973 if that make you feel any better.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…