• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

SCOTUS rejects Texas lawsuit hoping to overturn election

poweRob said:
I wish they wouldn't but dems are whimps and won't fight back. They never do unfortunately. Succession talk is already ramping up.

www.rawstory.com

Limbaugh: US ‘trending toward secession’ — and ‘peaceful coexistence’ between red and blue states is impossible

During his long career in talk radio, Rush Limbaugh has thrived on us-versus-them rhetoric — claiming that that liberals and progressives have a viewpoint that is diametrically opposed to true Americanism. And during his December 9 broadcast, the far-right radio host argued that the divisions...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com

And then there was this today after the ruling...

thehill.com

Texas lawmaker to file bill calling for vote on secession from US

A Texas state lawmaker has vowed to introduce legislation allowing a referendum for voters to cast their ballots on whether to secede from the United States.
thehill.com thehill.com

The right wing nutjob stupidity... it's just beginning.
Click to expand...

Texas leaving would be great. I wish them luck.
 
... wow, you mean nobody in SCOTUS believes the Hugo Chavez connection? That is just too bad.
 
poweRob said:
And I still won't be comfortable until Biden is sworn in. And I predict after that... trump will have some of his brainless twisted followers who will start shooting.
Click to expand...

Sadly I suspect you are correct in your prediction.
 
SCOTUS: 2 out 9 might hear ya, but if we vote it is 9 to 0 and you wont like the result.

Trump Supporters:

95e67b35ad67aa897fb2a362383eb56b.jpg
 
poweRob said:
I wish they wouldn't but dems are whimps and won't fight back. They never do unfortunately. Succession talk is already ramping up.

www.rawstory.com

Limbaugh: US ‘trending toward secession’ — and ‘peaceful coexistence’ between red and blue states is impossible

During his long career in talk radio, Rush Limbaugh has thrived on us-versus-them rhetoric — claiming that that liberals and progressives have a viewpoint that is diametrically opposed to true Americanism. And during his December 9 broadcast, the far-right radio host argued that the divisions...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com

And then there was this today after the ruling...

thehill.com

Texas lawmaker to file bill calling for vote on secession from US

A Texas state lawmaker has vowed to introduce legislation allowing a referendum for voters to cast their ballots on whether to secede from the United States.
thehill.com thehill.com

The right wing nutjob stupidity... it's just beginning.
Click to expand...
Let’em go.
Dems need to invoke pain on Reps or they’re encouraging more bad behavior in the future.
 
MTAtech said:
Let’em go.
Dems need to invoke pain on Reps or they’re encouraging more bad behavior in the future.
Click to expand...
Prepare for some disappointment I'm afraid. The key words will be "we're looking forward, not back" or "Turning the page" or "don't wan't to give trump any air time, just want him to fade away".
 
JANFU said:
This should only happen in a banana Republic. Not the US
Click to expand...
The Republicans are trying to turn the US into a Banana Republic
Have a nice night
 
pamak said:
He is browsing QAnon and Sputnik News and copies down the next talking points.
Click to expand...
I understand from the MAGA internet after SCOTUS ruling, after a month of denying Biden's win, the general response is accusing Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett of being deep state plants and calling for civil war/martial law.

About half the people I'm seeing on The Donald and Parler, though, are insisting losing at Supreme Court was all part of the plan. The earlier theory was that lower court losses were good because it got them closer to SCOTUS. Now it's good to lose at the Supreme Court, too!
 
MTAtech said:
I understand from the MAGA internet after SCOTUS ruling, after a month of denying Biden's win, the general response is accusing Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett of being deep state plants and calling for civil war/martial law.

About half the people I'm seeing on The Donald and Parler, though, are insisting losing at Supreme Court was all part of the plan. The earlier theory was that lower court losses were good because it got them closer to SCOTUS. Now it's good to lose at the Supreme Court, too!
Click to expand...

I am completely unfamiliar with this part of the internet. To me it belongs to the "dark web" together with the sites that sell hard drugs and child pornography.
If they want to have a civil war, I will watch their slaughter from the sidelines. I bet they are two few (after excluding the mouthy trolls) to offer any serious resistance and their demise will elevate the IQ of this country by a few points. For the time being, I am not worried about them! But I cannot say the same thing about the future and I do not discount a growing trend of militarist/political activism which can create a serious national problem down the road.
 
There's a lot of ignorant people in the news reporting on this case which makes for a lot of ignorant people of what actually was stated in the ruling today. The SC ruled on standing only saying Texas did not have standing to bring forth this case but what they did not rule on is the merits of the case.

As soon as that ruling came forth. Rep. Kelly and Parnell of PA whose case was not dismissed by the SC but was denied an injunction, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari in their case. In other words they are seeking a merits review from Scotus on their case. Standing is certainly not an issue in this case.

More news out today a case brought forth by Lin Wood from Georgia on behalf of Georgians is now on the docket to be heard by Scotus. This case has standing. This case is based on the actions of the Sec. of State making an agreement with Democrats on how mail in ballots would be handled this election which greatly weakened the barriers the legislature had put in place to limit fraud in mail in voting. And he is loaded for bear with evidence of fraud that occurred.

In Wisconsin today the Trump team lawyers that wanted to present their case to the state supreme court earlier were told they had to be heard in the lower court first. The judge ruled today and recognized the merits of the Constitutional elements in the case but his focus was narrow on what he could rule on. So he then ruled against the Trump lawyers but immediately had his ruling in a short two sentences and digitally signed sent it to the state supreme court which is probably the most favorable to the Trump team so far. The court will hear the case tomorrow.

In Michigan some news came out today about the lawyer representing Michiganders that was able to find a judge that would allow a forensic investigation on approximately 2 dozen Dominion voting machines. A team of white hat hackers were able perform this investigation and today this attorney was seeking permission to release these findings to the state legislators asap. Then he wants them available for all attorneys involved in cases of fraud and for all the American people.
 
vesper said:
There's a lot of ignorant people in the news reporting on this case which makes for a lot of ignorant people of what actually was stated in the ruling today. The SC ruled on standing only saying Texas did not have standing to bring forth this case but what they did not rule on is the merits of the case.

As soon as that ruling came forth. Rep. Kelly and Parnell of PA whose case was not dismissed by the SC but was denied an injunction, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari in their case. In other words they are seeking a merits review from Scotus on their case. Standing is certainly not an issue in this case.

More news out today a case brought forth by Lin Wood from Georgia on behalf of Georgians is now on the docket to be heard by Scotus. This case has standing. This case is based on the actions of the Sec. of State making an agreement with Democrats on how mail in ballots would be handled this election which greatly weakened the barriers the legislature had put in place to limit fraud in mail in voting. And he is loaded for bear with evidence of fraud that occurred.

In Wisconsin today the Trump team lawyers that wanted to present their case to the state supreme court earlier were told they had to be heard in the lower court first. The judge ruled today and recognized the merits of the Constitutional elements in the case but his focus was narrow on what he could rule on. So he then ruled against the Trump lawyers but immediately had his ruling in a short two sentences and digitally signed sent it to the state supreme court which is probably the most favorable to the Trump team so far. The court will hear the case tomorrow.

In Michigan some news came out today about the lawyer representing Michiganders that was able to find a judge that would allow a forensic investigation on approximately 2 dozen Dominion voting machines. A team of white hat hackers were able perform this investigation and today this attorney was seeking permission to release these findings to the state legislators asap. Then he wants them available for all attorneys involved in cases of fraud and for all the American people.
Click to expand...

😂
 
vesper said:
There's a lot of ignorant people in the news reporting on this case which makes for a lot of ignorant people of what actually was stated in the ruling today. The SC ruled on standing only saying Texas did not have standing to bring forth this case but what they did not rule on is the merits of the case.

As soon as that ruling came forth. Rep. Kelly and Parnell of PA whose case was not dismissed by the SC but was denied an injunction, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari in their case. In other words they are seeking a merits review from Scotus on their case. Standing is certainly not an issue in this case.

More news out today a case brought forth by Lin Wood from Georgia on behalf of Georgians is now on the docket to be heard by Scotus. This case has standing. This case is based on the actions of the Sec. of State making an agreement with Democrats on how mail in ballots would be handled this election which greatly weakened the barriers the legislature had put in place to limit fraud in mail in voting. And he is loaded for bear with evidence of fraud that occurred.

In Wisconsin today the Trump team lawyers that wanted to present their case to the state supreme court earlier were told they had to be heard in the lower court first. The judge ruled today and recognized the merits of the Constitutional elements in the case but his focus was narrow on what he could rule on. So he then ruled against the Trump lawyers but immediately had his ruling in a short two sentences and digitally signed sent it to the state supreme court which is probably the most favorable to the Trump team so far. The court will hear the case tomorrow.

In Michigan some news came out today about the lawyer representing Michiganders that was able to find a judge that would allow a forensic investigation on approximately 2 dozen Dominion voting machines. A team of white hat hackers were able perform this investigation and today this attorney was seeking permission to release these findings to the state legislators asap. Then he wants them available for all attorneys involved in cases of fraud and for all the American people.
Click to expand...
You've made this place dumber with this
 
vesper said:
There's a lot of ignorant people in the news reporting on this case which makes for a lot of ignorant people of what actually was stated in the ruling today. The SC ruled on standing only saying Texas did not have standing to bring forth this case but what they did not rule on is the merits of the case.

As soon as that ruling came forth. Rep. Kelly and Parnell of PA whose case was not dismissed by the SC but was denied an injunction, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari in their case. In other words they are seeking a merits review from Scotus on their case. Standing is certainly not an issue in this case.

More news out today a case brought forth by Lin Wood from Georgia on behalf of Georgians is now on the docket to be heard by Scotus. This case has standing. This case is based on the actions of the Sec. of State making an agreement with Democrats on how mail in ballots would be handled this election which greatly weakened the barriers the legislature had put in place to limit fraud in mail in voting. And he is loaded for bear with evidence of fraud that occurred.

In Wisconsin today the Trump team lawyers that wanted to present their case to the state supreme court earlier were told they had to be heard in the lower court first. The judge ruled today and recognized the merits of the Constitutional elements in the case but his focus was narrow on what he could rule on. So he then ruled against the Trump lawyers but immediately had his ruling in a short two sentences and digitally signed sent it to the state supreme court which is probably the most favorable to the Trump team so far. The court will hear the case tomorrow.

In Michigan some news came out today about the lawyer representing Michiganders that was able to find a judge that would allow a forensic investigation on approximately 2 dozen Dominion voting machines. A team of white hat hackers were able perform this investigation and today this attorney was seeking permission to release these findings to the state legislators asap. Then he wants them available for all attorneys involved in cases of fraud and for all the American people.
Click to expand...

Yes vesper, the people are ignorant, and any moment now, all of these things will get some traction, and THEN, only after all of these "white hat hackers" cool kids, get a look at this, only then will we have the truth.

It is almost there. Why can't anyone else be as unignorant as you, and see that this case is JUST about to burst wide open?

🙄
 
poweRob said:
And I still won't be comfortable until Biden is sworn in. And I predict after that... trump will have some of his brainless twisted followers who will start shooting.
Click to expand...
Huh?? It's been the leftists who have been rioting, looting, destroying property, attacking people enjoying an evening out and shooting cops. Nothing the Republicans have done compares to what the cowardly leftists have done to their fellow citizens..
 
vesper said:
There's a lot of ignorant people in the news reporting on this case which makes for a lot of ignorant people of what actually was stated in the ruling today. The SC ruled on standing only saying Texas did not have standing to bring forth this case but what they did not rule on is the merits of the case.

As soon as that ruling came forth. Rep. Kelly and Parnell of PA whose case was not dismissed by the SC but was denied an injunction, today filed a petition for writ of certiorari in their case. In other words they are seeking a merits review from Scotus on their case. Standing is certainly not an issue in this case.

More news out today a case brought forth by Lin Wood from Georgia on behalf of Georgians is now on the docket to be heard by Scotus. This case has standing. This case is based on the actions of the Sec. of State making an agreement with Democrats on how mail in ballots would be handled this election which greatly weakened the barriers the legislature had put in place to limit fraud in mail in voting. And he is loaded for bear with evidence of fraud that occurred.

In Wisconsin today the Trump team lawyers that wanted to present their case to the state supreme court earlier were told they had to be heard in the lower court first. The judge ruled today and recognized the merits of the Constitutional elements in the case but his focus was narrow on what he could rule on. So he then ruled against the Trump lawyers but immediately had his ruling in a short two sentences and digitally signed sent it to the state supreme court which is probably the most favorable to the Trump team so far. The court will hear the case tomorrow.

In Michigan some news came out today about the lawyer representing Michiganders that was able to find a judge that would allow a forensic investigation on approximately 2 dozen Dominion voting machines. A team of white hat hackers were able perform this investigation and today this attorney was seeking permission to release these findings to the state legislators asap. Then he wants them available for all attorneys involved in cases of fraud and for all the American people.
Click to expand...
A great synopsis, thanks, and demonstrates how the Constitution and the laws are being followed. No riots in the street, attacking innocent people or destroying public property. This is an example of how adults behave in a well run democracy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom