- Joined
- Jul 31, 2010
- Messages
- 3,595
- Reaction score
- 1,259
- Location
- Kentucky
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Prove it is man
See thread linked in signature.
That does not prove it is 100% man
Global warming - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It is not 100% man, however man is the primary cause of global warming and many of the effects that are natually causing global warming only occurred after the help of man made catalyst.
That's a good question but that is one of those questions that I would guess is harder to quantify verses showing actual average temperature hikes and the pH of the atmosphere forming differently since the start of the industrial revolution.
That's a good question but that is one of those questions that I would guess is harder to quantify verses showing actual average temperature hikes and the pH of the atmosphere forming differently since the start of the industrial revolution.
To say it is 100 % man as Duece does tells me there would be no climate change or we would be cooling neither of which i would believe
Just to clarify, Scientific American isn't peer reviewed, but the study that the article is reporting on is being published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, which is. The OP could be interpreted either way.Just out, and from a peer-reviewed magazine, and about a study just concluded by real scientists. Yes, global warming is real. The study is based on 10 key indicators. The more of them that are up, the more correlation there is to global warming. Guess what? ALL of the 10 key indicators are up.
Article is here.
Can you expand on what you mean?
In what matter would things be cooling because of man?
Ok so here you are saying if GW is caused by man, then the earth's temperature the past 100+ years should have declined on average rather than ascend.If GW is 100% man then we should be cooling.
Here you are saying with man there is warming and so we are cooling because we are warming?Without man there would be no warming so we would be cooling
Ok I am going to deconstruct what you just said, because I think I am losing you somewhere.
Ok so here you are saying if GW is caused by man, then the earth's temperature the past 100+ years should have declined on average rather than ascend.
Here you are saying with man there is warming and so we are cooling because we are warming?
No if man was not causing warming we would be cooling because Duece says warming is 100% caused by man.
The sun is currently in a level trend and other mechanics do not change appreciably over the span of a couple decades. Nature is a net carbon sink.
I honestly think global warming doesn't exist. I think the Earth is just going through a cycle. Besides, if Al Gore is heading the prevention of global warming movement, why does he have so many cars and houses?
And check out this link: Arguments Against Global Warming, Evidence Against Global Warming - The Public Square
Just out, and from a peer-reviewed magazine, and about a study just concluded by real scientists. Yes, global warming is real. The study is based on 10 key indicators. The more of them that are up, the more correlation there is to global warming. Guess what? ALL of the 10 key indicators are up.
Article is here.
The site you presented is questionable at best. Why do they have a bunch of quotes from religious figures on the side? The site also argues that no steps need to be taken to reduce emissions in the first place. You know, there are health risks to this also. I am reminded of when I was a boy walking around the acres of farmland my grandfather had and I found an old dilapitaded farm house that was the boyhood home of his neighbor and finding some old LIFE magazines. The back cover had an ad for Charleston cigarettes that read, "9 out of 10 doctors recommend Charleston!".
Also you want to know why Al Gore has so many houses and cars and a bunch of other B.S. because he's a hypocrite and a whore.