It's pretty funny. I don't reply to his posts for a couple of days and I get this:
I wonder where camlok is hiding?
I honestly don't know what camlok's thinking is regarding what, in his opinion, the video shows. What does the "nose cone" mean?lol. This proves it you really can't be serious. You have to be trolling.
Watched the video 3 times. There is no missile in hitting anything. Maybe you need to get glasses
Hes not hiding, hes scouring truther sites to try and find a response to your post, when that fails he will resort to a diversion
I honestly don't know what camlok's thinking is regarding what, in his opinion, the video shows. What does the "nose cone" mean?
1. Does he think it means that the perimeter columns were removed by explosives or thermite to permit the plane to easily pass through?
2. Does he think it means that the only thing strong enough to penetrate both perimeter column walls is a missile?
3. Does he think it means that someone edited the video and forgot to remove or added the perfect "nose cone"?
And he won't answer questions. All he does is go into rants about people being dishonest and not providing evidence.
Oh well.
Great points.It really is strange. It does do a good job of demonstrating just how poor the critical thinking ability of your average CTer is though. Which by itself is not that bad as some people just were born without that capacity. Not their fault.
Unfortunately it also demonstrates the lack of honesty your average truther has. If they were actually interested in finding out the truth then when presented with evidence like this that destroys their theories they would admit the fault in their ideas and be open to discussing it. Truthers though either just run away or do there best to ignore it or change the topic. It proves how little they are actually interested in the truth.
Great points.
I have nothing to gain by what they call "supporting the official story" so if they provided evidence that shows there was a conspiracy, then so be it. But to stall discussion because they would rather rant on how some people are dishonest cowards or shills is ridiculous. Why can't they move the discussion forward by discussing points and counter points provided in each thread?
Case in point. It has been stated in this forum that the presence of molten molybdenum is evidence of thermite or other nefarious circumstance. So I started looking into this and came up with these points and/or questions.
1. Molten molybdenum was not actually viewed, but was assumed based on the presence of molybdenum microspheres.
2. So the next question is WHEN were those molybdenum formed? Was it the day of 9/11? Or were they formed by torches during construction back in the late 60s, early 70s? If you can't answer these questions, then you can't say those microspheres prove anything. I just provided reasonable doubt regarding that claim.
Not sure why it's so hard to discuss things.
It really is strange. It does do a good job of demonstrating just how poor the critical thinking ability of your average CTer is though. Which by itself is not that bad as some people just were born without that capacity. Not their fault.
Unfortunately it also demonstrates the lack of honesty your average truther has. If they were actually interested in finding out the truth then when presented with evidence like this that destroys their theories they would admit the fault in their ideas and be open to discussing it. Truthers though either just run away or do there best to ignore it or change the topic. It proves how little they are actually interested in the truth.
Truther is an ironic name
It is a sarcastic demeaning title. It is used in a pejoratively sense. Even then some "truthers" try to spin it as a positive.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?