- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 31,926
- Reaction score
- 29,390
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada Dual citizen
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
This is all about Obama's legacy.
The EU can't afford to lose business with the US. Moreover this isn't giving the Iranians a chance to not make a bomb.
The Iranians are doing the same thing as NKorea did with Bill Clinton. Which is why the Iranians are using the NKoreas same end run play. No discussion on their Military Programs and their ballistics.
Do you think the Iranians can be set up, and made so angry that they would do the Stupid and utter those 7 words we want to hear? That would be.....We Declare War on the United States.
As then there is Only one response and Iran will no longer be a problem in the world anymore.
At least you admit that you only want war with Iran. So many are claiming there are other alternatives to this agreement. Let the Israeli's do it since they are trying to kill the talks.
Well not really, after I said there could still be a political negotiation and that the last resort that all are looking to avoid. Still might take place.
All it takes is the Iranians to not agree or keep doing what they have been. Its a consideration that can't be taken off the table.....Correct?
This is all about Obama's legacy.
Is he right?
<snip>
Washington (CNN)—A key Senate Democrat is throwing his weight behind a proposal that would allow Congress to reject the Iran nuclear deal, complicating President Barack Obama's efforts to dodge Republican opposition and lock in the pact on his own.
New York Sen. Chuck Schumer said Monday that he is backing legislation introduced by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) to give Congress the ability to halt the implementation of the deal once the United States and five other world powers finalize the details in the coming months.
"This is a very serious issue that deserves careful consideration, and I expect to have a classified briefing in the near future. I strongly believe Congress should have the right to disapprove any agreement and I support the Corker bill which would allow that to occur," Schumer told Politico on Monday.
Schumer: Congress should OK Iran deal - CNN.com
No I don't think we will invade Iran EVEN if they continue to make a bomb. We might try to bomb them but it will only delay the inevitable and cause even more unrest inthe area. The best hope is to make it better for Iran to not make a bomb. Threatening invasion will only harden their resolve.
The problem is Obama is extremely narcissistic and working with others is out of the question. Even his own party. Harry Reid and Pelosi did everthing Obama asked them to do. Robert Menendez was the only one that spoke out against Obama now hopefully Schumer will stand up when they see this narcissist running off crazy.
However in the end, there will never be a deal that will include "free and immediate inspections anytime anywhere". Without this there is no verification and the deal that Obama will accept is useless.
Schumer is an idiot- according to the treaty clause it is the POTUS that negotiates with foreign powers, not Congress. What exactly has Schumer done in all his years in Congress anyway? He's a career politician who sits on the fence on everything and only gets on TV so he can get reelected.
This agreement is a joint exercise which all parties must agree to. Your comments about Obama are not relevant or truthful. They make me think that the only thing you care about is that it will be a victory of Obama which you can't abide. That is also not true or relevant. A successful agreement will benefit all the world.
Is he right?
<snip>
Washington (CNN)—A key Senate Democrat is throwing his weight behind a proposal that would allow Congress to reject the Iran nuclear deal, complicating President Barack Obama's efforts to dodge Republican opposition and lock in the pact on his own.
New York Sen. Chuck Schumer said Monday that he is backing legislation introduced by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) to give Congress the ability to halt the implementation of the deal once the United States and five other world powers finalize the details in the coming months.
"This is a very serious issue that deserves careful consideration, and I expect to have a classified briefing in the near future. I strongly believe Congress should have the right to disapprove any agreement and I support the Corker bill which would allow that to occur," Schumer told Politico on Monday.
Schumer: Congress should OK Iran deal - CNN.com
This agreement is a joint exercise which all parties must agree to. Your comments about Obama are not relevant or truthful. They make me think that the only thing you care about is that it will be a victory of Obama which you can't abide. That is also not true or relevant. A successful agreement will benefit all the world.
That is true. I just hope that the US is not the reason that Iran makes a nuclear weapon in the near future. Since I don't believe we will invade that means Iran will quite possibly ignite an nuclear arms race in the M.E. Just what that region needs and it could again be our fault.
At least you admit that you only want war with Iran. So many are claiming there are other alternatives to this agreement. Let the Israeli's do it since they are trying to kill the talks.
You mean the legacy of being a relatively moderate president, who makes pragmatic policy decisions in the best strategic and economic interest of his country. Sounds like a legacy Obama should continue to pursue.
The problem is Obama is extremely narcissistic and working with others is out of the question. Even his own party. Harry Reid and Pelosi did everthing Obama asked them to do. Robert Menendez was the only one that spoke out against Obama now hopefully Schumer will stand up when they see this narcissist running off crazy.
However in the end, there will never be a deal that will include "free and immediate inspections anytime anywhere". Without this there is no verification and the deal that Obama will accept is useless.
An all out war with Iran is not needed to stop them from producing nukes We do not need a ground invasion. A few well placed bunker buster bombs and stealth bomber runs could set them back decades.
If Iran intends to build nuclear weapons, they are going to do so unless stopped. Blaming the US for Iran building nukes is ludicrous. If we are to be blamed for anything, it's not stopping them in that quest. Barack "Neville Chamberlain" Obama does not seem to care whether Iran gets nukes as long as one is not produced on his watch.
Another moron president by the name of Jimmuh Carter made a similar agreement with North Korea.
Jimmy Carter is the only US president to have achieved a semblance of peace in the Middle East. Compared to Reagan, Carter was a monumental success.
I guess you forgot the Iran Hostage Crisis, 52 Americans held for 444 days under Carter's watch. I think those 52 Americans will tell you it was no peaceful time.
I bet the nearly 3000 Americans who died on Bush's watch would tell you he wasn't the greatest defense against Islamic terrorism.
Did Congress have to ratify our nuclear agreements with North Korea, Libya, etc?
If not, then there's no reason to require it now.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?