Most of these boys I'm referring are straight. Boys should grow up to be men, not girly men.
Well, I do, because I've read the entire ruling and foot notes.I don't think so:
How many gays/lesbians do we have in the U.S.? How many of them were raised by opposite-sex parents? The vast majority, right? If you don't like homosexuality, don't allow straight people to procreate -- they're producing the vast majority of gays.
Now are the leftists and gays just so convinced they are going to win that they think they are going to win 9-0 as well. LOL.
Perhaps you just don't have anything to say and should stop posting.
What does that have to do with my post? I'm asking what is causing this behavior in young boys and you accuse me of being homophobic? Get over yourself.
How many gays/lesbians do we have in the U.S.? How many of them were raised by opposite-sex parents? The vast majority, right? If you don't like homosexuality, don't allow straight people to procreate -- they're producing the vast majority of gays.
I just somehow doubt that being raised by a single mom or two women without a father figure in sight is good at raising men. Call me what you will for that, but I think the evidence is out there that shows I'm right.
Which bring's home the point: why is the state in the marriage business in the first place?
Asking such an inane question such as yours will get that type of reaction.
What does that have to do with my post? I'm asking what is causing this behavior in young boys and you accuse me of being homophobic? Get over yourself.
There is nothing wrong with my question.
Property and money.Which bring's home the point: why is the state in the marriage business in the first place?
Well, I do, because I've read the entire ruling and foot notes.
There is nothing wrong with my question. Do you think only gay men can act girly? If so, wouldn't that say more about you than me?
I don't know what you're asking. This is based on What If's random comment in post 229, so I guess you should ask him, see if he wants to explore it.What do you have in mind?
this idea of girly men is part of the problem ... it even gets some kids beaten up, and even killed ... so why not stop referring to kids in this way?
Once again Scalia is full of crap ... How many decisions by Scalia will it take for people to realize that he has an agenda and rules principally on his religious and other believes? Look up activist judge and his picture appears next to it. In the first place, there is not that much disagreement at all among sociologists on this question. His comment was misleading at best. The evidence suggests that there is little, if any difference, in how well the kids turn out relative to kids raised by straight parents. A recent article that came out suggesting that kids raised by gay parents don't turn out as well, was deeply flawed (and funded by two conservative organizations) and has been taken to task by other social scientists. We still need more data, but what we have thus far suggests that the harm is no less and no more. Why don't we ask, "Are opposite-sex harmful to their kids?"
Do you think only gay men can act girly? If so, wouldn't that say more about you than me?
The term "girly men" originated, to my recollection, in a Saturday Night Live skit that was thoroughly heterosexual. Just sayin' . . .
You hate him because his politics are different than yours, that's the length and breadth of it. And that's where all this vitriol against Scalia is coming from.
I don't know what you're asking. This is based on What If's random comment in post 229, so I guess you should ask him, see if he wants to explore it.
I don't, I've discussed Loving dozens of time on DP. There's nothing new to be said.
Whites could marry other races,just not blacks specifically, and other races could marry without limit. The restriction shot down by Loving v. Virginia was specifically about blacks and whites. No other races. Whites could still marry Latinos if they wanted...just not blacks.
That's why that ban was struck down.
If the restriction were broad, requiring both parties to be of the same race in order to marry, regardless of the race, the law would likely have stood.
You have to love the circular logic here. You pose the original question and I paraphrase "Why are more boys acting girly? And now you ask me if only gay men can act girly?
You can't make this **** up.
I hate Scalia because he's using his bully pulpit to espouse intolerance. His behavior is without personal consequence.
Property and money.
When you say the state shouldn't be in the marriage business you're saying that if someone dies without a will....everything should just...sit there...that there shouldn't be any rules establishing a next-of-kin, no rules on inheritance, not rules on selling estate assets to pay medical bills....nothing. The only owner died and so now no one owns it so it just sits there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?