• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Say, has anyone heard from Anthony Fauci lately?

Our justice will come in November when Fausti resigns because he knows his ass will be investigated.
Jordan et al will not let the little dwarf off the hook. Perp walk time.
 
Should Fauci be concerned with stalkers?
 
You are a terrible debater and ignorant to boot.


Do better.
Says the one who is clueless on mask wearing in 1918 which was nothing more than chess cloth and like today, politicians were caught not wearing them and other countries did not wear them.

you should research before you post nonsense.
 
Says the one who is clueless on mask wearing in 1918

What? People wore masks?!?!? Here i thought you had said they'd done nothing?

Lmao, you are embarrassing yourself talking about a pandemic lasting years, and killing 50 million people.

Why?
 
What? People wore masks?!?!? Here i thought you had said they'd done nothing?

Lmao, you are embarrassing yourself talking about a pandemic lasting years, and killing 50 million people.

Why?
Wearing a cheesecloth was as useless as the masks worn today. By the way where is your evidence that ANY state did far better than others because they wore masks?

oh WAIT! I asked you and others for this a hundred times and you ran away. Just saying”masks work” is like saying “I pray and done day God will hear me if it is His will.”
 
I mean. How in the world are so many getting by without the insufferable a$$hole Fauci constantly in your grill?

He has been dispatched to Bush league JV status as Covid that never was as scary as he made it to be, is allowed to fade to black.

I don’t care to see or hear anything from little tyrant until the day he flies west.
———-


berman-fauci-730x0.jpg

Has anyone else noticed a strange lacuna in the COVID-19 media Force? As though a single voice with a million appearances on national television has suddenly gone silent? Actually, yes, someone has, but before we get there, let’s take a quick peek at the media page for Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) as of this morning.


Fauci spoke at a Whitehouse press briefing 3/2/22

This is so sad.
 
Wearing a cheesecloth

Ah, so now you are making up what they were wearing. You do know mass produced non thread masks were available in the 1910s, right?

Lol, why talk about a pandemic in the past, when you've already been wrong about a pandemic you are living through?
 
Wearing a cheesecloth was as useless as the masks worn today. By the way where is your evidence that ANY state did far better than others because they wore masks?

oh WAIT! I asked you and others for this a hundred times and you ran away. Just saying”masks work” is like saying “I pray and done day God will hear me if it is His will.”

In other words they wore masks during the Spanish Flu.

And studies have been presented as nauseam.

You ignored them.
 
What is it about the world's leading expert in virology and infectious diseases that upsets you so much? Let me guess; he's working under a Democrat administration therefore anything he says or does must automatically be challenged. Am I close?

What makes you think he’s the best?
 
He's now keeping a low profile. It's getting closer to the election.
Fauci crawled back under his bureaucratic rock from which he crawled out from under earlier.
  • There is growing concern about what will happen once the public health emergency declaration comes to an end, as it will begin the unraveling of the expansive support system and end key flexibilities that have aided the effort to respond to the pandemic.
  • Those supports increase the availability of grant and appropriation funding to local governments and groups working to prevent and treat the virus, allow health care providers access to the billions of dollars allocated to the HHS Provider Relief Fund, allow states to waive certain regulatory requirements as they continue to respond to the pandemic, and expand access to telehealth and telemedicine capabilities.
  • NBC News previously reported that up to 15 million people, including 6 million children, are at risk of losing Medicaid coverage once the public health emergency ends, as it would cause states to lose federal funding and the flexibility to keep people on the Medicaid rolls without continuously checking on their eligibility.
Biden administration extends public health emergency for Covid-19
Health Secretary Xavier Becerra announced Friday that the government would extend the declaration for the eighth time.​
By Phil McCausland, Jan. 14, 2022​

Imagine that, a government that has gained a huge increase in power is unwilling to give it up, and continues the ‘public health emergency’ justified by the COVID fear they’ve sown. Didn’t the politicians of the left declare the uninsured a health care emergency? Is this how they achieving their public policy agenda justified on the back of the waning COVID pandemic?

Fauci will crawl back out from under his bureaucratic rock probably after the election, and declare restrictions again, whatever Biden, or rather more so his administration, wants.
 
Fauci crawled back under his bureaucratic rock from which he crawled out from under earlier.
  • There is growing concern about what will happen once the public health emergency declaration comes to an end, as it will begin the unraveling of the expansive support system and end key flexibilities that have aided the effort to respond to the pandemic.
  • Those supports increase the availability of grant and appropriation funding to local governments and groups working to prevent and treat the virus, allow health care providers access to the billions of dollars allocated to the HHS Provider Relief Fund, allow states to waive certain regulatory requirements as they continue to respond to the pandemic, and expand access to telehealth and telemedicine capabilities.
  • NBC News previously reported that up to 15 million people, including 6 million children, are at risk of losing Medicaid coverage once the public health emergency ends, as it would cause states to lose federal funding and the flexibility to keep people on the Medicaid rolls without continuously checking on their eligibility.
Biden administration extends public health emergency for Covid-19
Health Secretary Xavier Becerra announced Friday that the government would extend the declaration for the eighth time.​
By Phil McCausland, Jan. 14, 2022​

Imagine that, a government that has gained a huge increase in power is unwilling to give it up, and continues the ‘public health emergency’ justified by the COVID fear they’ve sown. Didn’t the politicians of the left declare the uninsured a health care emergency? Is this how they achieving their public policy agenda justified on the back of the waning COVID pandemic?

Fauci will crawl back out from under his bureaucratic rock probably after the election, and declare restrictions again, whatever Biden, or rather more so his administration, wants.
Since the Russia/Ukraine thing will likely be over by the time the elections roll around and the Biden pukes will need another excuse to avoid the blame for out of control energy prices and the resulting inflation, you may be correct: The Biden pukes very well might resurrect the COVID boogyman and use it to unleash more power against the American people.

Perhaps they are planning on that to control the outcome of the 2022 election...just like they used COVID to control the outcome of the 2020 election.
 
Since the Russia/Ukraine thing will likely be over by the time the elections roll around and the Biden pukes will need another excuse to avoid the blame for out of control energy prices and the resulting inflation, you may be correct: The Biden pukes very well might resurrect the COVID boogyman and use it to unleash more power against the American people.

Perhaps they are planning on that to control the outcome of the 2022 election...just like they used COVID to control the outcome of the 2020 election.
Let's hope that the State legislatures which have revised their state's voting laws and regulations have implemented changes needed to curb this 'control the outcome of the 2020 election'. No party should have this control.
 
Ah, so now you are making up what they were wearing. You do know mass produced non thread masks were available in the 1910s, right?

Lol, why talk about a pandemic in the past, when you've already been wrong about a pandemic you are living through?
Done with you. You are too uniform for me and don't read up on the topics and just shoot from the hip and don't know what you're talking about. You can't call cheesecloths a mask. Here is a link for you to ghet educated.


"This is from a study published in 1919 by the California State Department of Health. The above graph showed very little difference in death rates between Stockton, which mandated the wearing of masks in public, and Boston, which did not. So, early on, authorities were skeptical of the effectiveness of masks, but they also felt that masks were not used properly.

Part of the disappointment was that medical authorities had advised using medical gauze, which had a tighter weave than what most people understood as “gauze.” Then as now, not everyone had access to the personal protective equipment solutions that were recommended. People were using cheese cloth for masks, with predictable outcomes. The problem was the user. A more pessimistic appraisal of masks came in a study published in 1921 by physician William T. Vaughan:"


“No evidence was presented which would justify compelling persons at large to wear masks during an epidemic. The mask is designed only to afford protection against a direct spray from the mouth of the carrier of pathogenic microorganisms … Masks of improper design, made of wide-mesh gauze, which rest against the mouth and nose, become wet with saliva, soiled with the fingers, and are changed infrequently, may lead to infection rather than prevent it, especially when worn by persons who have not even a rudimentary knowledge of the modes of transmission of the causative agents of communicable diseases.”

“Epidemiological and Statistical Data, US Navy, 1918,” Reprinted from the Annual Report of the Surgeon General, US Navy, (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1919) 434.

Although the Surgeon General of the US Navy acknowledged that wearing masks by hospital staff was good practice, “the morbidity rate, nevertheless, was very high among those attending the sick,” and may only have prevented infection from a direct, close hit from a cough or sneeze of a patient."



The bolded shows history does repeat itself and it is noted that you do not respond to the mask-wearing states NOT showing any better results than the ones that didn't wear masks.

Further, the public soured on masks and stopped wearing them.

Frankly, I am fed up with your gaslighting as well as the continued lies and deceit by many others here with regard to the ineffectiveness of masks. By now, you all know you were and are 1200% wrong on masks and yet continue to gaslight like idiots still claiming Trump colluded with Russia.
 
And yet here you are, advertising him; a person you clearly despise for reasons best known to yourself, and you're giving him even more exposure.
His last appearance was somewhere around the 17th or so when most states had aleady issued their new plans for covid, masks etc. Since then the Russia/Ukraine conflict has dominated the air waves and there has been no new uptics in Covid where his or CDC's presence is required. Not to mention that since the majority of Russian bots disseminating false info have been eliminated from several social media sources; not much anti-Fauci news
 
Last edited:
Done with you. You are too uniform for me and don't read up on the topics and just shoot from the hip and don't know what you're talking about. You can't call cheesecloths a mask. Here is a link for you to ghet educated.


"This is from a study published in 1919 by the California State Department of Health. The above graph showed very little difference in death rates between Stockton, which mandated the wearing of masks in public, and Boston, which did not. So, early on, authorities were skeptical of the effectiveness of masks, but they also felt that masks were not used properly.

Part of the disappointment was that medical authorities had advised using medical gauze, which had a tighter weave than what most people understood as “gauze.” Then as now, not everyone had access to the personal protective equipment solutions that were recommended. People were using cheese cloth for masks, with predictable outcomes. The problem was the user.
A more pessimistic appraisal of masks came in a study published in 1921 by physician William T. Vaughan:"

<snipped>
The most important part of this study was the improper use of a mask ........ Obviously if a mask was not used properly, any study results would have been flawed too

So, early on, authorities were skeptical of the effectiveness of masks, but they also felt that masks were not used properly.

Part of the disappointment was that medical authorities had advised using medical gauze, which had a tighter weave than what most people understood as “gauze.” Then as now, not everyone had access to the personal protective equipment solutions that were recommended. People were using cheese cloth for masks, with predictable outcomes. The problem was the user.
 
The most important part of this study was the improper use of a mask ........ Obviously if a mask was not used properly, any study results would have been flawed too

So, early on, authorities were skeptical of the effectiveness of masks, but they also felt that masks were not used properly.

Part of the disappointment was that medical authorities had advised using medical gauze, which had a tighter weave than what most people understood as “gauze.” Then as now, not everyone had access to the personal protective equipment solutions that were recommended. People were using cheese cloth for masks, with predictable outcomes. The problem was the user.
and..................???

Oh, wait!!! Just what the left says today when the crappy SHole state they live in makes everyone wear masks.
 
and..................???

Oh, wait!!! Just what the left says today when the crappy SHole state they live in makes everyone wear masks.
Funny. Seems you are pulling the partisan card here. I just quoted the significant part of the article which you conveniently bypassed that contradicted you :LOL:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom