Ruth Bader Ginsburg praises Brett Kavanaugh as 'very decent' man | The IndependentLiberal*Supreme Court*justice*Ruth Bader Ginsburg*has defended the two most recent additions to America’s highest court as “very decent, very smart” individuals, in spite of ongoing controversy surrounding their nomination.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg praises Brett Kavanaugh as 'very decent' man | The Independent
Lol less than a year ago the left was screaming how Trump deystroyed the bench and they even talked sbout adding judges to dilute the impact of conservative judges there. Here we have RBG defending his picks.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Ruth Bader Ginsburg praises Brett Kavanaugh as 'very decent' man | The Independent
Lol less than a year ago the left was screaming how Trump deystroyed the bench and they even talked sbout adding judges to dilute the impact of conservative judges there. Here we have RBG defending his picks.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
You realize that it's likely that she only knows him on a professional level, and that people can act one way at work, and differently in their personal life, right?...
I've lost count of the number of times that I've heard on the news a neighbor of someone who committed a crime say "He was such a nice quiet man"...
Ruth Bader Ginsburg praises Brett Kavanaugh as 'very decent' man | The Independent
Lol less than a year ago the left was screaming how Trump deystroyed the bench and they even talked sbout adding judges to dilute the impact of conservative judges there. Here we have RBG defending his picks.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Oh that's EXACTLY what she was getting at...
:roll:
Wishful thinking.One of her dearest friends was Antonin Scalia. What would make you think she's so partisan that she can't give an honest assessment of a man? Why does this surprise you?
I wonder if Kavanaugh will now say she's a very decent woman.
And why do you have an RIP tag on this thread?
One of her dearest friends was Antonin Scalia. What would make you think she's so partisan that she can't give an honest assessment of a man? Why does this surprise you?
I wonder if Kavanaugh will now say she's a very decent woman.
And why do you have an RIP tag on this thread?
I dont know why a RIP tag is on it? I did not add it. Can it be removed?One of her dearest friends was Antonin Scalia. What would make you think she's so partisan that she can't give an honest assessment of a man? Why does this surprise you?
I wonder if Kavanaugh will now say she's a very decent woman.
And why do you have an RIP tag on this thread?
Can you read her mind?
Are you implying that she knows him on a personal level?
Do you ever watch the news when they're interviewing neighbors?
You're talking out your ass.You realize that it's likely that she only knows him on a professional level, and that people can act one way at work, and differently in their personal life, right?...
I've lost count of the number of times that I've heard on the news a neighbor of someone who committed a crime say "He was such a nice quiet man"...
I dont know why a RIP tag is on it? I did not add it. Can it be removed?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Ruth Bader Ginsburg praises Brett Kavanaugh as 'very decent' man | The Independent
Lol less than a year ago the left was screaming how Trump deystroyed the bench and they even talked sbout adding judges to dilute the impact of conservative judges there. Here we have RBG defending his picks.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
You're talking out your ass.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
One of her dearest friends was Antonin Scalia. What would make you think she's so partisan that she can't give an honest assessment of a man? Why does this surprise you?
I wonder if Kavanaugh will now say she's a very decent woman.
And why do you have an RIP tag on this thread?
Seriously, I nearly dropped a brick load in my pants seeing RIP and RBG in the same sentence before fully reading
Im not surprised that she gets along with the others on the bench. I posted it because it illustrates how phoney the protests by the left were during the confirmation hearings.It's funny that some of these posters don't realize what their surprise that she would say that says about those posters and the assumptions they regularly make about any judge they think is "liberal" or who was appointed by a Democrat.
If you're surprised she would say that, YOU are the one who behaves in a partisan fashion. It's not some kind of shocker that a 'liberal justice' would praise a conservative colleague or vice versa. Judges don't behave or rule in ways because of their own political lean or that of the person who appointed them. YOU put the label "liberal" or "conservative" on them based on who YOU think those decisions with political implications favor, but the ruling didn't come about because the justice decided to make that side win and worked his/her way backwards from there.
And just like you make those assumptions, some of you apparently assume that if you call a justice "liberal", that means it is somehow important when they praise a colleague.
Im really sorry sbout that it was unintentionalSeriously, I nearly dropped a brick load in my pants seeing RIP and RBG in the same sentence before fully reading
It's funny that some of these posters don't realize what their surprise that she would say that says about those posters and the assumptions they regularly make about any judge they think is "liberal" or who was appointed by a Democrat.
If you're surprised she would say that, YOU are the one who behaves in a partisan fashion. It's not some kind of shocker that a 'liberal justice' would praise a conservative colleague or vice versa. Judges don't behave or rule in ways because of their own political lean or that of the person who appointed them. YOU put the label "liberal" or "conservative" on them based on who YOU think those decisions with political implications favor, but the ruling didn't come about because the justice decided to make that side win and worked his/her way backwards from there.
And just like you make those assumptions, some of you apparently assume that if you call a justice "liberal", that means it is somehow important when they praise a colleague.
Im not surprised that she gets along with the others on the bench. I posted it because it illustrates how phoney the protests by the left were during the confirmation hearings.
Ok if they believed her and feel that way than why have the protests stopped?Psssst: my post was an attack on the thinking in the bolded.
To the extent someone protested, it was because they found his accuser credible and felt 40 years should not excuse what they believed occurred. (And I don't want to get into it again, but do bear in mind that you can be convicted of rape based solely on the alleged victim's testimony....so there's no inherent unfairness in not getting a top job because of one witness's testimony). The fact that a justice you deem liberal complimented Kavanaugh-now does not in any way prove or disprove that the witness was lying or mistaken about what Kavanaugh-then did to her. One has nothing to do with the other.
But you assume it does.
Why? Because of a partisan approach to the matter.
Ok if they believed her and feel that way than why have the protests stopped?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?