- Joined
- May 29, 2017
- Messages
- 721
- Reaction score
- 542
- Location
- N.C., originally from NYC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Bill Taylor, the top US diplomat in Ukraine, revealed during the first public impeachment hearing Wednesday that a member of his staff, who was accompanying Sondland to meetings in Kiev, saw the ambassador call Trump from his cell phone and overheard the President asking about "the investigations."
This is not a criminal trial. Would you like me to explain why your comment was stupid, or would you just ignore it anyways?Objection your Honor! Hearsay.
Objection sustained, the members of the jury will disregard the witness's last statement.
This is not a criminal trial. Would you like me to explain why your comment was stupid, or would you just ignore it anyways?
You're right. It's yet another Democrat kangaroo court.
You're right. It's yet another Democrat kangaroo court.
I know.You're right.
Why do you use terms you clearly don't know the meaning of?It's yet another Democrat kangaroo court.
This is the kind of kangaroo court...ing that you are talking about.
[]
That phone call was ill-advised on many levels. Certainly from a security standpoint.
Sondland should have made his call to Trump from the huge US Embassy complex in Kyiv.
You're right. It's yet another Democrat kangaroo court.
Hearsay testimony becomes much more compelling when supported by corroborating evidence/testimony, as is happening in the impeachment hearings.The kooks seem to think hearsay is extremely reliable.
Hearsay and circumstantial evidence can be, and often are, admissible.Objection your Honor! Hearsay.
Objection sustained, the members of the jury will disregard the witness's last statement.
Hearsay is used in investigations all the timeHearsay and circumstantial evidence can be, and often are, admissible.
It can also be used in impeachment hearings, which is what I was referring to. And I made no reference to trials,Hearsay is used in investigations all the time
the "trial" happens in the Senate
Objection your Honor! Hearsay.
Objection sustained, the members of the jury will disregard the witness's last statement.
I know.
Why do you use terms you clearly don't know the meaning of?
This is an impeachment inquiry. This means Congress is considering impeachment charges for wrongdoing by the President and are currently gathering facts and evidence to decide whether or not they wish to formally bring charges. This Constitutional process is not, and has never been intended to be, a "court" in any sense of the word. This is an investigation.
Seriously, why do Trump defenders say the stupidest things?
I know.It can also be used in impeachment hearings, which is what I was referring to. And I made no reference to trials,
I know.
Why do you use terms you clearly don't know the meaning of?
This is an impeachment inquiry. This means Congress is considering impeachment charges for wrongdoing by the President and are currently gathering facts and evidence to decide whether or not they wish to formally bring charges. This Constitutional process is not, and has never been intended to be, a "court" in any sense of the word. This is an investigation.
Seriously, why do Trump defenders say the stupidest things?
No, you may consider yourself a kangaroo because you bounce off walls trying to defend the indefensible, but in the end, just another ignorant traitor trumpy statement.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?