- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 56,981
- Reaction score
- 27,029
- Location
- Chicago Illinois
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Depends you might have to throw a Bruce Jenner in the mix.....then it might compute. :lol:
Hypothetically ... if Hillary was arranging Bill's speaking fee with a Foundation donor for whose business enterprise she was discussing details, would you consider that official or private?
As usual.....always thinking in one dimension when it comes to BO. You still cant comprehend that part about others overseas and their Non public schedules as well as others in the WH and their being hacked. Don't worry tho.....one day you will understand it. But it wont be as exciting as when you think of BO.
Nope, I'm addressing this from a technical perspective and I asked you to do the same. You admitted you don't actually understand the technology behind this. I showed you how it was possible to hack Hillary's e-mail. I asked you how you'd implement that on a State Dept. computer. You obviously can't say because you don't know. I explained why your theory was not possible from a technical perspective and why your example was irrelevant. You have yet to recognize that. Don't insult the intelligence of even normal people when you're peddling an analysis that simply isn't possible. It makes you sound like guys who say that fire can't melt steel beams.
What part about a couple pages back stating I wouldn't discuss it on just the technical, didn't you get? You might think its just a mere coincidence that all the hacking activity increased after Hillary became SOS. Many others don't.
Moreover.....both she and BO have admitted to sharing emails with each other. Now we have hackers that used the State Dept to hack the WH and BO. You can disagree but that doesn't mean there isn't another perception that is being looked into.
"For whose business enterprise she was discussing details"
Why don't you just say she was pimping Bill and giving away government contracts?I would consider pimping an ex-pres and selling state stuff to be official.
Your conspiracy theory is okay, but it's not based on what is technically possible through an e-mail and how it relates to a server. For that reason, it will continued to be dismissed.
You really are showing that you don't know what you're discussing. Please, just stop this absurdity. A server can't be hacked simply by knowing of an account existing within it. You're basically saying that our State Dept/WH server security can be beaten through methods that AOL can't beat... but that an average corporation easily can defend itself from.
Well I have never stated it was done by just email
Oh this just gets better and better. Now BO and his Team are admitting that the Russians have been getting to BO's unclassified emails. Do you recall BO grinning as he admitted he had emails from Hillary and emailed her back. All while Hillary said no official business were in her private emails. That she was never hacked. Sure is starting to look like Hillary gave up more than just a breach to National Security, doesn't it? Even worse was BO and his Team thinking they could keep this hidden. What say ye?
Russian hackers who penetrated sensitive parts of the White House computer system last year read President Barack Obama's unclassified emails, the New York Times reported on Saturday, quoting U.S. officials. There is no evidence that the president's email account itself was hacked, White House officials said. Still, the fact that some of Mr. Obama's communications were among those retrieved by hackers has been one of the most closely held findings of the inquiry," the paper said.
The New York Times said on Saturday the breach had been "far more intrusive and worrisome than has been publicly acknowledged." It said that although no classified networks had been compromised, officials conceded that the unclassified system still contains highly sensitive information such as email exchanges with diplomats, exchanges about personnel moves and legislation, presidential schedules and discussion about policy.
The paper said that Senior White House officials had known for months about the depth of the intrusion.....snip~
Russian hackers read Obama's unclassified emails last year: NYT
You don't get it yet? The e-mails are irrelevant to hacking the server itself. That's not how this works. They're not connected in any way other than something being compromised. You suggested the opposite from the beginning had happened and is completely absurd. Hillary, on her best day of complete lucidity, would not be privy to the information required to make such an attack possible. You've tried to change that fact by pointing at how her e-mail was hacked, however, her server was hacked using methods which work for FACEBOOK, pretending that State Dept has as much security as FB is silly. That's what your analysis does on every level.
Note, I had said Hillary's email and server and that I didn't get off into all the technical. That she was the bait. She was breached......and it starting to look like that its more than National Security she has given up.
And I explained why you don't know what you're talking about because your understanding of the technology is lower than that of the movie Hackers. That's quite the accomplishment. You're basically ignoring that your eccentric patois is just pseudo-intellectual jargon that doesn't actually address the matter. It's on par with getting wifi on your phone.
Yeah well going back and reading the thread all the way thru
Yes, it's clear that you made an analysis that is simply baffling to a person with even a slight understanding of the technology you are discussing. Please, if you feel I'm wrong, I welcome you to sign up to any white hat forum and inform yourself on the issue. As it stands, you can't even discuss the basics of the issue. That being, the type of setups we're discussing here. If you can't discuss that, why should your analysis be given any thought? If you did know what you're discussing, you would have already realized what's wrong with your analysis.
Nah, if you noticed it wasn't baffling to several others.
Relying on others to get your back? Hm, interesting. That seems to be a preferred method of yours when your arguments fail. However, it's irrelevant to the matter because they're only showing that they're as uninformed as yourself. It really is terrifying that you'd come up with such an absurd analysis without knowing the basics of the technology you're discussing. What's next? Hillary's e-mail allowed the next NASA failure to happen?
Funny how reporters can do the same damn thing.
Oh? A reporter said it was possible to hack one server by having 'e-mails and passwords', using keyloggers and social engineering? Do you even know what you're discussing in the least bit? You seem to be the only person here trying to justify your ridiculous analysis. All of the sources you keep posting just show how little you actually know about what is being discussed. Lmao. You're basically saying that State Dept. has ****tier security than Debate Politics.
Sure enough, however social engineering, viruses and keyloggers will never get you into a State Dept's server. Neither will the information that they produce. There simply is no transmittable information contained in any e-mail that would allow somebody to get into a State Dept server because they're not facebook accounts. You don't simply get a password and an account and you're good to go which is what you've been inferring for some time. That's why the entire premise that the WH/State Dept were hacked through some bit of information contained in Hillary's account is laughable if not outright mythical. This isn't a movie.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?