- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 25,358
- Reaction score
- 21,961
- Location
- Rocky Mtn. High
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
[h=1]Rudy Giuliani says Trump didn't collude with Russia but can't say if campaign aides did[/h]
"...Rudy Giuliani said Wednesday that he never denied President Donald Trump's campaign colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign, only that the President himself was not involved in collusion.In an interview with CNN's Chris Cuomo on "Cuomo Prime Time," Giuliani, a former New York mayor and Trump's attorney, said he doesn't know if other people in the campaign, including former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, were working with the Kremlin during the 2016 presidential race.
"I never said there was no collusion between the campaign, or people in the campaign," Giuliani said.
He added, "I said the President of the United States. There is not a single bit of evidence the President of the United States committed the only crime you can commit here, conspiring with the Russians to hack the DNC." ...'
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/16/politics/rudy-giuliani-cnntv/index.html
You have to love rolling disclosure. We have gone from Russian interference in the US elections was a "nothing burger" to "No collusion" to "Yes, there may been collusion, but Trump wasn't involved" to ...... [insert next disclosure here]
So the Trump team finally admits there may have been collusion within the campaign. This is a stark contrast to there was "no collusion?..... Of course, rolling disclosure is just that, not the truth, just a step or two ahead or sometimes behind what is generally known about the truth. Rolling disclosure usually means more to follow.
What we can say now is that Team Trump has admitted there may have been collusion, so the statement "no collusion" is henceforth a lie.
Stay tuned.
Last edited: