- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,257
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
So my question is the following: When is FOX News going to drop Rudy and Fred from the debates, hmmmmmm?
Article is here.
I enjoy it as well, but the fact is Thompson will do well in a few southern States and Guliani will do well in the ultra liberal states.
Alaska is probably the only state Paul has a shot at winning.
So my question is the following: When is FOX News going to drop Rudy and Fred from the debates, hmmmmmm?
Article is here.
So my question is the following: When is FOX News going to drop Rudy and Fred from the debates, hmmmmmm?
Article is here.
Fred will probably drop out after the South Carolina Primary. If Rudy does not win Florida, then he may as well drop out as well.
I think its essentially a three way race among the Republicans. Romney McCain, and Huckabee. Of course since it seems like the Republicans are doing everything humanly possible to ensure their defeat come November, I doubt they will nominate McCain (their only real chance) and instead will go with Huckabee, or if they really want to lose big, Romney.
My messege for Ron paul supporters is to have moved to Russia in the early 90s thats the closest economic system to what he is in favour of was and guess what it was a disaster.
What the hell are you talking about? Comparing free-market Austrian economics to the anything-but economics of the early Russian Federation is a bit far-stretched.
Please clarify.
No the early capitalist sytem brought in russia was an extremely regulation free economy and what do you know it became a gangsta economy.
That's horrible. Too bad they privatized the KGB :lol:
Now, how would deregulating the US economy make it a gangsta one?
Today, regulation in the US means that, for example, you can only choose healthcare options that benefit big business, and oil and coal recieve billions in subsidies while there are large tarrifs on imported ethanol. Or pay-to-pollute programs allow large corporations to pay what's to them a small fee in order to pollute, while smaller businesses are penalized greatly.
Regulation itself has been used by the US federal govt to ensure large profits to their sponsors, not the other way around.
Try it remove the regulations and the gangstas will jump in.A house on every business you wanna buy some insurance to make sure your building doesent accidently burn down? dont worry we are are a legitmate business well theres nothing stopping us anyway.We are simply a business that couldnt exist formally because of those regulation that stopped us being legit now give us money we know where your family lives after all.
That''s OK. He is for abolishing the Federal Reserve so all is forgiven. :roll:Thought I read somewhere that Ron Paul wrote racist homophobic material back in the day? How on earth would that qualify him for anything but leading the KKK?
Thought I read somewhere that Ron Paul wrote racist homophobic material back in the day? How on earth would that qualify him for anything but leading the KKK?
Fred will probably drop out after the South Carolina Primary. If Rudy does not win Florida, then he may as well drop out as well.
I think its essentially a three way race among the Republicans. Romney McCain, and Huckabee. Of course since it seems like the Republicans are doing everything humanly possible to ensure their defeat come November, I doubt they will nominate McCain (their only real chance) and instead will go with Huckabee, or if they really want to lose big, Romney.
I think if Fred doesn't do well in SC, he'll drop out.
I hate to say this, but Romney will be the Republican candidate.
As much as it pains me to say it I can somewhat live with Romney being the candidate as long as Huckabee or Rudy dont become the nominee.
I enjoy it as well, but the fact is Thompson will do well in a few southern States and Guliani will do well in the ultra liberal states.
Alaska is probably the only state Paul has a shot at winning.
Now, how would deregulating the US economy make it a gangsta one?
untrue.
A newsletter in his name did write some awful things.
Ron Paul took moral responsibility for it, but he didn't write the articles and doesn't agree with the author.
This is an example of how the American Press works. Hillary has been known to say awful things about jewish people. John McCain has basically said that he hates all gooks and will forever. This isn't someone else saying these things, they said it directly out of their own mouths. But these people represent the system in place, so those things are virtually ignored by the free press.
What I don't understand is why some anonymous people would decide to put out a newletter in an old congressman/third party candidate's district, put his name on it, and not put their own names on the newsletter.
It also doesn't make sense that no one has come forth and claimed responsibility for the newsletters, since that quickly dispell all attacks on Paul.
Any explanations, Paulites?
The Republican establishment has tried this same old smear in attempts to force him out of the party in the past, and to try and replace him with someone who would toe the party line, going back more than 10 years. However, the voters of Brazoria County in Texas have repeatedly sent him back to Congress, because they know a slime job for exactly what it is. While Dr. Paul practiced medicine he delivered lots of babies, and they WERE Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and yes, White too. He never took Medicaid as payment, and if people could not afford to pay, he never referred them to collection agencies. A few times, he accepted payment in chickens, which he donated to the local food bank.ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – In response to an article published by The New Republic, Ron Paul issued the following statement:
“The quotations in The New Republic article are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts.
“In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person's character, not the color of their skin. As I stated on the floor of the U.S. House on April 20, 1999: ‘I rise in great respect for the courage and high ideals of Rosa Parks who stood steadfastly for the rights of individuals against unjust laws and oppressive governmental policies.’
“This story is old news and has been rehashed for over a decade. It's once again being resurrected for obvious political reasons on the day of the New Hampshire primary.
“When I was out of Congress and practicing medicine full-time, a newsletter was published under my name that I did not edit. Several writers contributed to the product. For over a decade, I have publicly taken moral responsibility for not paying closer attention to what went out under my name.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?