• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roe has been overruled.

A

Atreus21

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
2,904
Reaction score
1,026
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
www.scotusblog.com

Supreme Court overturns constitutional right to abortion - SCOTUSblog

This article was updated on June 24 at 3:11 p.m. The Supreme Court on Friday eliminated the constitutional right to obtain an abortion, casting aside 49 years of precedent that began with Roe v. Wade. The decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across t
www.scotusblog.com www.scotusblog.com

We can at last return to democracy.
 
Atreus21 said:
www.scotusblog.com

Supreme Court overturns constitutional right to abortion - SCOTUSblog

This article was updated on June 24 at 3:11 p.m. The Supreme Court on Friday eliminated the constitutional right to obtain an abortion, casting aside 49 years of precedent that began with Roe v. Wade. The decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across t
www.scotusblog.com www.scotusblog.com

We can at last return to democracy.
Click to expand...
LOL! Clueless comment. Tyranny of the minority is the opposite of "democracy".

IOW, the number of voters who voted for the U.S. Senators and the two consecutive G.O.P. presidents who nominated four consecutive white
Roman Catholic Justices who made this ruling were either elected in their states by smaller than national average votes or lost the popular vote
in presidential elections resulting in their presidencies.

Neither Bush or Trump arrived at the White House through popular vote and a Wyoming senator elected by 200,000 votes, max. voted for
these four judicial nominees while a California senator who received 10 million votes opposed the four Bush and Trump nominees.

The voters who voted for the senators from the least populous states and for Bush and Trump had the least average adult education of all voters.
 
Last edited:
We have already seen the violence from democrats. Chuck Schumer ordered the murder of SCOTUS Justice Kavanaugh, which thankfully failed. democrat terrorist group Janes Revenge has savagely attacked Abortion opponents across the nation. Fascist commentator Keith Olbermann is demanding that the democrats simply ignore the court.

How bad will this get? How violent will the democrats become? Burning cities is a given, democrats do that for any or no reason. But how far will the fascists push this? Will the democrats try and seize in a coup and declare themselves dictatorial rulers?

I expect a bumpy ride.
 
Current SC has become a political tool. Some members of on the court seemed to have misrepresent themselves during Congressional hearings regarding their appointment.

Sad day for America. So the SC 50 years ago got it wrong? What makes the current SC right?
 
Atreus21 said:
www.scotusblog.com

Supreme Court overturns constitutional right to abortion - SCOTUSblog

This article was updated on June 24 at 3:11 p.m. The Supreme Court on Friday eliminated the constitutional right to obtain an abortion, casting aside 49 years of precedent that began with Roe v. Wade. The decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across t
www.scotusblog.com www.scotusblog.com

We can at last return to democracy.
Click to expand...
Revoking established rights is not democracy. It's more akin to fascism. So, what rights will we lose next?
 
mike2810 said:
Current SC has become a political tool. Some members of on the court seemed to have misrepresent themselves during Congressional hearings regarding their appointment.

Sad day for America. So the SC 50 years ago got it wrong? What makes the current SC right?
Click to expand...

Most constitutional court in 70 years.

Two decisions in two days upholding the United States Constitution.
 
Gordy327 said:
Revoking established rights is not democracy. It's more akin to fascism. So, what rights will we lose next?
Click to expand...

Can you point to "abortion" in the Constitution?

Have you ever read the Constitution?

It's going to be fun watching the radical left lose their shit. That's what I like about this board - fringe left....
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Can you point to "abortion" in the Constitution?

Have you ever read the Constitution?
Click to expand...
Abortion was supported under the umbrella of privacy, which is supported by the Constitution and multiple legal precedents. Or do you seriously think something must be explicitly stated in the Constitution to be legally valid or applicable?
 
I have not been following this matter, for I am not particularly interested in it.

But I am astonished that it seems the state of Mississippi is responsible for making the Court come up with this decision.

One would think that most people in Mississippi would be supporters of abortion.
 
Gordy327 said:
Abortion was supported under the umbrella of privacy, which is supported by the Constitution and multiple legal precedents. Or do you seriously think something must be explicitly stated in the Constitution to be legally valid or applicable?
Click to expand...

ROFL

{The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,}

Demanding private records from Trump - directly prohibited - is fine by the fringe left.

www.nbcnewyork.com

Federal Court Rules Manhattan DA Can Subpoena Trump's Tax Records

A federal appellate court on Monday ruled that Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance can subpoena the president’s tax records from his accountants, rejecting President Trump’s immunity claims.
www.nbcnewyork.com www.nbcnewyork.com

But not one word about abortion their - which you claim is the only purpose of the amendment.

9 unelected jurists crafted law in direct contradiction of the checks and balances of our constitution. That law has been found unconstitutional - well duh. Now democracy is restored and the question returns to the people in the many states rather than dictators in robes.
 
Gordy327 said:
To choose abortion.
Click to expand...

That was never a right. It's was part of another right which you alluded to in another post but still got slightly wrong.

Abortion stems from the right to privacy between a patient and their doctor to prescribe a medically valid treatment.

Sounds like a good right that people should have, yes? The problem comes when it's only ever been applied to a contraception pill and abortion and explicitly denied to things like medical marijuana.

It was a fake right to begin with a legal loophole to move progress faster than society was ready for, RGB has even said something similar.

No one should have ever supported Roe, but people should support the right to privacy between a patient and their doctor to prescribe a medically valid treatment.
 
X Factor said:
Awesome, didn’t, honestly, think I’d ever see this.
Click to expand...
Punisher, generally, or only against poorest women fornicating?

Fortune
The end of Roe will cause ‘chaos,’ financial disaster for many women, experts say
Jackson Women's Health, the state claimed that women have made such great economic strides in the past five decades that Roe v.
3 mins ago
"Things might be better for women now than they were 50 years ago, but overturning Roe would set that progress back.

With the Supreme Court's decision Friday in favor of Mississippi, the U.S. may see just how far back women's financial and economic outcomes will regress. The Court ruled not only to uphold Mississippi's ban, but to overturn Roe completely.

"We hold that Roe and [Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey] must be overruled," writes conservative Justice Samuel Alito in the majority opinion. "The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."

At best, this is class warfare. I would support an abortion ban that "rolls up" all women, not exclusively the ones easily trapped in the jursidiction subject
to the restrictions. IOW, fairness requires trapping the donor class and the governing and litigating classes, as well.

All women between ten and sixty would be required to submit a very recent M.D. exam result indicating pregnancy status to depart from a dock or an
airstrip or land border crossing. Re-entry to a U.S. jurisdiction would require interview by a border "minder" who would compare the departure pregnancy
status with the present status, upon attempted reentry. IOW, all fetuses must be accounted for. If the poorest women can be forced by law to carry to full
term a pregnancy initiated by rape or incest, the wealthy woman damn well ought to be forced to do so, also.

If you depart the U.S. pregnant and attempt to reenter no longer pregnant and without sufficient proof of delivery or miscarriage, you forfeit the privilege
of reentry.
 
Last edited:
TheParser said:
I have not been following this matter, for I am not particularly interested in it.

But I am astonished that it seems the state of Mississippi is responsible for making the Court come up with this decision.

One would think that most people in Mississippi would be supporters of abortion.
Click to expand...

That's how the court works.

Cases are brought before it when states or citizens appeal.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
ROFL

{The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,}

Demanding private records from Trump - directly prohibited - is fine by the fringe left.

www.nbcnewyork.com

Federal Court Rules Manhattan DA Can Subpoena Trump's Tax Records

A federal appellate court on Monday ruled that Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance can subpoena the president’s tax records from his accountants, rejecting President Trump’s immunity claims.
www.nbcnewyork.com www.nbcnewyork.com

But not one word about abortion their - which you claim is the only purpose of the amendment.

9 unelected jurists crafted law in direct contradiction of the checks and balances of our constitution. That law has been found unconstitutional - well duh. Now democracy is restored and the question returns to the people in the many states rather than dictators in robes.
Click to expand...
WTF ? His fraudulant foundation, by itself, establishes probable cause. The evidence of his property tax fraud, contradicted by his bank loan fraud, were
not even necessary to establish sufficient probable cause to investigate him and his organization.
 
Loulit01 said:
SUPREME COURT MEETS THIRD RAIL!

Explosion to come. News at 11.
Click to expand...

How violent will democrats become? Are the Brown Shirts already organized to rape, rob, murder, and burn? Will democrats make this a "hot weekend?"

Nothing democrats hate more than civil rights. Returning the question to the people of the many states has the Reich melting down.
 
mike2810 said:
Don't agree.
Click to expand...

Most of those on this board are fringe left - dedicated to the eradication of the United States Constitution. Upholding civil rights pleases those like me - but democrats have worked to end constitutional rights once and for all. The idea that the PEOPLE have a say in abortion runs contrary to the authoritarian goals of democrats. We are to be ruled - letting people in the many states have a say is verbotten.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom