Roberts sworn in to preside over Trump impeachment trial | TheHill
Roberts then walked to the front of the chamber and was sworn in by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). After Roberts took his oath, Grassley could be overheard telling him, "God bless you."
Indeed!
Roberts sworn in to preside over Trump impeachment trial | TheHill
Roberts then walked to the front of the chamber and was sworn in by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). After Roberts took his oath, Grassley could be overheard telling him, "God bless you."
Indeed!
Is Justice Roberts wearing his impeachment robes?
View attachment 67271934
Note the stripes on the upper arms. Justice Scalia had these robes specially made for Clinton's impeachment.
Are you joking or something? Based on memory, you are wrong about the stripes and his name isn't Scalia...?
Scalia presided over Clinton's impeachment, iirc.
Scalia presided over Clinton's impeachment, iirc.
Is Justice Roberts wearing his impeachment robes?
View attachment 67271934
Note the stripes on the upper arms. Justice Scalia had these robes specially made for Clinton's impeachment.
Scalia presided over Clinton's impeachment, iirc.
Chief Justice John Roberts will preside over the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump -- only the third person ever to serve in that role. What exactly are his responsibilities, and how is Roberts’ own character likely to shape his contributions? The National Law Journal’s Marcia Coyle and CNN’s Joan Biskupic, both authors of books about the chief justice, join John Yang to discuss.
roberts will follow Rehnquist. who did nothing.Lucky Roberts...he gets to be in the middle of a politically motivated ****storm.
I'd say "No thanks, give the job to someone else."
roberts will follow Rehnquist. who did nothing.
he is going to stay out of it.
roberts will follow Rehnquist. who did nothing.
he is going to stay out of it.
Agreed, unless he needs to break a tie
People are both fantastically overestimating and underestimating the significance of his involvement. Your post is an example of the latter.
Interestingly enough, this miscalculation of his powers crosses the political aisle.
What I found interesting is that the entire senate swore to be impartial.
After so many declared they would not be publicly.
Oaths mean nothing.
What I find interesting is that the House didn't have to swear to anything when they impeached Trump. They were all free to be as dishonest as they wanted to impeach and now they expect honesty in the Senate. There's something seriously wrong with that process.
What I find interesting is that the House didn't have to swear to anything when they impeached Trump. They were all free to be as dishonest as they wanted to impeach and now they expect honesty in the Senate. There's something seriously wrong with that process.
Right but you are fine with Republicans in the senate opening vowing to break their oath to the trial and to the country. To ignore any and all evidence and regardless of what happened loyalty to party. Your hypocrisy and loyalty to the man you worship is not impressive. You don't find it interesting you are just justifying your hyper partisan extreme alt right wing narrative.
*points to impeachment wildcard*Roberts sworn in to preside over Trump impeachment trial | TheHill
Roberts then walked to the front of the chamber and was sworn in by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). After Roberts took his oath, Grassley could be overheard telling him, "God bless you."
Indeed!
That might depend upon whether he has strong ideology on the impeachment, and whether he wants his ideology to count?Lucky Roberts...he gets to be in the middle of a politically motivated ****storm.
I'd say "No thanks, give the job to someone else."
I would like to believe the chief justice will be wearing his I'm here to follow the law hat. Nothing more, nothing less.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?