• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RNC --- Urine in spray bottles?

Point of Order: Under the Intellectual Law of No True Scotsman Socialism, any attempt by any government to actually put Socialism into practice doesn't count, unless the consequences are deemed as good, until the consequences turn negative, at which point it no longer counts again.

That sounds right.
 
A neither...is someone not voting for either major candidate.

Good grief.

No... that's not how it works. See the reference of this was I suggested the country was too torn apart to continue as a whole, better to split it LEFT and Right. Nothing about Political parties or worthless candidates. A neither (implying neither left nor right, a centrist or "other") asked about their own area. I pointed out they get no area. You came in trying to tie my non-support of Trump as being proof I'm a hypocrite, and thus you had a GOTCHA moment.

You failed, in context, form and factor. You can admit this or not.
 
meh, nice try and I am sure you do

but your definition will fluctuate accordingly

like all tightie righties

In other words, you've got nothing. ;)
 
No... that's not how it works. See the reference of this was I suggested the country was too torn apart to continue as a whole, better to split it LEFT and Right. Nothing about Political parties or worthless candidates. A neither (implying neither left nor right, a centrist or "other") asked about their own area. I pointed out they get no area. You came in trying to tie my non-support of Trump as being proof I'm a hypocrite, and thus you had a GOTCHA moment.

You failed, in context, form and factor. You can admit this or not.
The context IS the incident at the convention, the subject of the thread. Everyone, cept you, recognizes the split in the US does divide along party lines, left-right has become liberal-conservative. Just because you don't like Trump as a representative of the GOP, and want to make no true Scotsman arguments about Trump as a conservative, it doesn't negate what the GOP is and that Trump has been chosen as their candidate. You are in the minority of your own party, YOU would need your own "area" separate from the "right". You are both a neither in this election and in your own fantasy. You republicans created this schism inside of your party, deal with it.
 
The context IS the incident at the convention, the subject of the thread. Everyone, cept you, recognizes the split in the US does divide along party lines, left-right has become liberal-conservative. Just because you don't like Trump as a representative of the GOP, and want to make no true Scotsman arguments about Trump as a conservative, it doesn't negate what the GOP is and that Trump has been chosen as their candidate. You are in the minority of your own party, YOU would need your own "area" separate from the "right". You are both a neither in this election and in your own fantasy. You republicans created this schism inside of your party, deal with it.

That's nice, you still failed miserably. You are off having discussions about things with yourself and then posting. Not such a good idea. Look I get it, you're crushing on me. Stop. My wife and I are quite happy together and are not interested in open marriage arrangements.
 
That's nice, you still failed miserably. You are off having discussions about things with yourself and then posting. Not such a good idea. Look I get it, you're crushing on me. Stop. My wife and I are quite happy together and are not interested in open marriage arrangements.

You have this habit of creating fantasies about what I do every time your "logic" gets destroyed. Yer under the impression that ad-hom is an allowable form of argument in this forum....it isn't.
 
You have this habit of creating fantasies about what I do every time your "logic" gets destroyed. Yer under the impression that ad-hom is an allowable form of argument in this forum....it isn't.

What adhom, wht fantasy? My logic is sound, it's quite clear he context that I and the other poster were talking is not the context you attempted to shoehorn in for your own failed attempt to attack my position. You attempted to shunt the conversation into a direction no one else was, for reasons that made sense only to you and frankly it's getting old.

I win, you lose. Have a nice day.
:2wave:
 
Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "pissed off"! :lamo

No, it gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "People who will stop at nothing to stop those who think differently." It gives a whole new meaning to the term "Bully."

We should be demanding a LOUD public denouncement from Dem. party leaders about this (that's what was demanded of Trump when something far less offensive was done by one of his supporters).
 
Everything breaks on Twitter first. KPLC
@KPLC7News
DEVELOPING: Activists from Black Lives Matter, Westboro Baptist Church and the KKK throwing urine at each other

Also...

Breaking911 @Breaking911
A man with a boot on his head is trying to drown out protesters with a bullhorn. (Yes, there's a video! LOL!)

You're missing out if you don't follow @Breaking911.


What's the downside of those 3 moronic groups going at each other?
 
absolutely

just like violent rightist have all kinds of tricks to hurt people

hello....violent people have no right or left

they are just

violent

Can you show us where a large number of right -wing people have done anything like what has been happening at multiple places by liberals?? Show us where right-wing people have gathered en masse to shut down highways, show where large numbers of right-wing people have attacked people for disagreeing with them. Yeah, you can find a onesie-twosie of a couple of guys, but show us where it been done en masse as the liberals are doing.
 
Well, when the number of incidents involving violent rightists reach the same number of incidents involving violent leftists, we will have a chance to compare tactics.

It seems to me, it might be a very long wait for those numbers to draw equal to each other.

WTF, are you *****ing me?

terrorists are violent rightists
 
Can you show us where a large number of right -wing people have done anything like what has been happening at multiple places by liberals?? Show us where right-wing people have gathered en masse to shut down highways, show where large numbers of right-wing people have attacked people for disagreeing with them. Yeah, you can find a onesie-twosie of a couple of guys, but show us where it been done en masse as the liberals are doing.

911...tightie righties

period
 
Point of Order: Under the Intellectual Law of No True Scotsman Socialism, any attempt by any government to actually put Socialism into practice doesn't count, unless the consequences are deemed as good, until the consequences turn negative, at which point it no longer counts again.

"The conflation of nazism and socialism has gone largely unchallenged by the media, and through repetition it is becoming almost "common knowledge" in the US, so I feel compelled to speak against it. I hope that others, especially professors who have occasion to talk about it in and out of class, will also speak against this vile propaganda.

The basis of the conflation of nazism and socialism is the term "National Socialism," a self description of the Nazis. "National Socialism" includes the word "socialism", but it is just a word. Hitler and the Nazis outlawed socialism, and executed socialists and communists en masse, even before they started rounding up Jews. In 1933, the Dachau concentration camp held socialists and leftists exclusively. The Nazis arrested more than 11,000 Germans for "illegal socialist activity" in 1936.

...

Nazism is a right wing ideology. It is violently racist, anti-socialist, and it targets the political left for extermination."

NazismSocialism
 
No, it gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "People who will stop at nothing to stop those who think differently." It gives a whole new meaning to the term "Bully."

We should be demanding a LOUD public denouncement from Dem. party leaders about this (that's what was demanded of Trump when something far less offensive was done by one of his supporters).

Why ? The KKK doesn't represent democrats.
 
WTF, are you *****ing me?

terrorists are violent rightists

Well, now that is interesting. Did you not claim terrorists have no right or left side?

Clearly you have nothing, so I'm done.

Have a nice day.
 
Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "pissed off"! :lamo
No, it gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "People who will stop at nothing to stop those who think differently." It gives a whole new meaning to the term "Bully."

We should be demanding a LOUD public denouncement from Dem. party leaders about this (that's what was demanded of Trump when something far less offensive was done by one of his supporters).
Oh, lighten-up a little.

I'm clearly joking here (as can be seen by the number of 'likes' my post received).
 
That's nice.

No, its weak. Just because Im not a R or D doesnt make me uncommitted. Just the opposite that perfectly describe those who vote R or D and are afraid to try something different.
 
No, its weak. Just because Im not a R or D doesnt make me uncommitted. Just the opposite that perfectly describe those who vote R or D and are afraid to try something different.

Yes, we should try to have no principles and just go with the flow of the day. Good plan. :rolleyes:
 
I'm not talking about parties.

You implied I was a coward who wouldnt take a side, because I dont vote for R or D.

You said:
Neithers are just cowards too afraid to commit to a position. You're sheep that will go where told.

Perhaps you meant so called independents.
 
Back
Top Bottom