• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Right Wing Fallacy #1 - The rich already pay a larger share.

Full Description:
When presented with the idea of raising taxes on the rich, the rebuttle is that the rich already pay the largest percentage of tax revenue.

Fallacy Category:
Circular Reasoning - You can't tax the rich because the rich are already taxed.
Appeal to pity - Percentage size implies a burdon that is already too great.

Argument Flaws:
Percentage as an argument:
When somebody starts using a percentage as an argument, they are already in trouble. There is no inherent meaning or implications in a percentage. It does not imply fairness, excess, or anything of the sort. It is a simple measure of a part to the whole. Nothing more, nothing less.

Taxes is only part of the equation:

Simplistic and obvious fact:
Top Bottom