• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

RFK on Pre-Vaccine Declines in Infectious Disease Mortality: The Role of Sanitation and Nutrition

No you posted an article. I responded specifically to the articles claims and you stuck to your vague reply.
In what way is my reply being vague???? It is a concise summary of what my link stated.
Healthy living is a good thing but does not eliminate the need for vaccines.
 
In what way is my reply being vague???? It is a concise summary of what my link stated.
Healthy living is a good thing but does not eliminate the need for vaccines.
Because you aren't responding specifically to my post where I showed your article wasn't accurate. If you are right then you should be able to tell me where I was wrong in that post right?
 
How could this be? Probably the antivaxxers fault.

Majority of mumps cases are among the vaccinated, CDC finds
As many as 94 percent of children and adolescents who contracted the highly contagious virus had been vaccinated.

 
It may not be perfect but it will always be better than doing nothing but listen to idiots like rfk.
https://www.cdc.gov/mumps/outbreaks/index.html
 
Because you aren't responding specifically to my post where I showed your article wasn't accurate. If you are right then you should be able to tell me where I was wrong in that post right?

LOL There's the pot calling the kettle black.
 

Microbes do change, to survive. It's entirely possible that the vaccine hadnt been revisted in decades since mumps was a non-issue, and mumps has mutated or a different variant took hold, to drive itself back into circulation (survive). And because this vax was introduced in the 60s, it's possible it doesnt confer lifetime immunity...people that took it then are now in their 60s. We'd only be learning this over time.

From your source:

"Experts aren’t sure why vaccinated people get mumps, but multiple factors appear to be affecting immunity in vaccinated people, including a lack of prior exposure to the virus, waning immunity and the circulation of genotypes the vaccine doesn’t contain." link

Again, this is basic epidemiology. Why didnt you already know that? Why didnt you even understand it when it came from your source?
 
Understandable response from you. You cannot deny what is said only pretend to laugh at it.
I'm laughing at you making excuses for how 94% of of kids who got the vaccine STILL got the mumps.
 
I'm laughing at you making excuses for how 94% of of kids who got the vaccine STILL got the mumps.
circulation of genotypes the vaccine doesn’t contain
88 percent effective against the disease
Plus, we don’t know how many of those kids had both doses of the MMR vaccine, when they had them (how long ago), what their specific health conditions are, etc.

Lots of factors when you actually understand the science
 
The answer is within the article from 2021 that you posted.


As I wrote...he doesnt understand what he posted, as usual. He doesnt have even a basic grasp of Epidemiology 101 and cant understand what he reads. He's led by partisan dogma alone...and his posts are a MAGA embarrassment.
 
As I wrote...he doesnt understand what he posted, as usual. He doesnt have even a basic grasp of Epidemiology 101 and cant understand what he reads. He's led by partisan dogma alone.
Yep.

Nothing more than a Twitter bot.
 
I'm laughing at you making excuses for how 94% of of kids who got the vaccine STILL got the mumps.
Not an excuse. It is a fact of diseases that they mutate and change. Vaccines need to be up to date and people need to get full vaccinations. All you are doing is pointing to the fact that a vaccine is not a 100% cure for all time. but then no one ever claimed they were except for anti vaxxers who then only point out where they have failed.
 
The unlimited gravy train for big pharma is over. They will still make plenty of money, but they are in big trouble with

-a new vaccine reporting system coming
-going back to gold standard science
-radical transparency and publishing the data that used to be hidden
-demanding replication in studies(big uh oh for big pharma since most of their "studies" are fake and are just tailored to sell medications)
-no more aluminum in vaccines(even bigger uh oh for big pharma)

Look at the rabid vaxers doing their very best(while failing miserably) to spin how 94% of kids who got the vaccine STILL got the mumps!

Maybe they need some boosters
 
And you actually expect an idiot like rfk or a corrupt president to actually do any of this?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…