• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Revealed: pro-Trump activists plotted violence ahead of Portland rallies

And who were the people doing the damage? Were they legitimate protesters whom one would fairly assume were LW or at least involved in a LW cause? Those doing the damage could have been RW. They could have been neither and just thugs. You don't know. Or, as you say, personal observation is the best tell so you tell me and how you can tell exactly what were the politics of these vandals/rioters/thugs?

When people are screaming black lives matter while smashing windows I think it’s safe to assume they’re left wing. Are the politics relevant to the researcher’s criteria on what constitutes a “peaceful” protest? Are you ever going to answer the questions?
 
When people are screaming black lives matter while smashing windows I think it’s safe to assume they’re left wing. Are the politics relevant to the researcher’s criteria on what constitutes a “peaceful” protest? Are you ever going to answer the questions?


And the arson, violence and cold-blooded murder? What's your evidence all was committed by the LW? Why should I answer your questions when you haven't answered questions pertinent to the claims you made first? Remember, what little you've answered is anecdotal. It's not evidence of fact. You are not the one that decides what is fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom