- Joined
- Jan 10, 2009
- Messages
- 42,744
- Reaction score
- 22,569
- Location
- Bonners Ferry ID USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Kinda torn on this.
On one hand, I can see where employers should be hiring the very best people that apply for their open positions.
But on the other hand, I can see where requiring citizenship for the role as LEO, and it doesn't strike me as out of line.
Compromise? What if the non-citizen is hired with the binding agreement to become a citizen within a specified time frame?
What do you think?
As long as they're here in the US legally and planning on becoming citizens, I say let em have the position.
Kinda torn on this.
On one hand, I can see where employers should be hiring the very best people that apply for their open positions.
But on the other hand, I can see where requiring citizenship for the role as LEO, and it doesn't strike me as out of line.
Compromise? What if the non-citizen is hired with the binding agreement to become a citizen within a specified time frame?
What do you think?
Why should non citizens of the United States have the power to enforce the laws of the United States.
Sure they should hire non-citizens as cops. Unfortunately they won't be able to arm those non-citizen cops because doing that is a violation of federal gun laws.
Some times these court decisions blow my mind.
Kinda torn on this.
On one hand, I can see where employers should be hiring the very best people that apply for their open positions.
But on the other hand, I can see where requiring citizenship for the role as LEO, and it doesn't strike me as out of line.
Compromise? What if the non-citizen is hired with the binding agreement to become a citizen within a specified time frame?
What do you think?
I think this would fall under the heading of 'judicial activism' and 'DOJ activism'.
Insane decisions prompted by an insane DOJ policy / position (as dictated by Obama? I wonder).
I am a little confused.
Isn't it illegal to hire non-citizens for any job?
If they don't have a social security number, how can they be hired?
Where would the collected taxes be paid to?
Kinda torn on this.
On one hand, I can see where employers should be hiring the very best people that apply for their open positions.
But on the other hand, I can see where requiring citizenship for the role as LEO, and it doesn't strike me as out of line.
Compromise? What if the non-citizen is hired with the binding agreement to become a citizen within a specified time frame?
What do you think?
I am a little confused.
Isn't it illegal to hire non-citizens for any job?
If they don't have a social security number, how can they be hired?
Where would the collected taxes be paid to?
Those who are vehemently in the "they must be citizens camp" can you explain your reasoning? Is it just that you feel uncomfortable with the idea of a non citizen wielding power over you or is there something more that you object.
I don't have an opinion one way or the other but am really curious about the rationale for being so dead set against the idea.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?