- Joined
- Oct 30, 2011
- Messages
- 19,078
- Reaction score
- 6,751
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Re: Request for Hillary Clinton emails would take 75 years to complete, State Departm
Several problems with your assertions. The problem is that Hillary used a private unsecured server as her only email server. That is not in question. Hillary has admitted as much and State has confirmed. It is not up to you or I to decide what is pertinent to the investigation and neither Hillary nor State has been forthcoming as to the location and content of the emails. First denying they ever existed, then that they were not sensitive or classified, than that they were classified after Hillary received them. Now it's just too much bother to retrieve them.
Regarding separate emails for private and public e mails, that's not only a good idea, that's what supposed to happen. Hillary didn't do that. Hillary did not use two e mail servers. In fact one her excuses was that she had already gone through her emails (which apparently didn't take 75 years) and deleted only personal e mails and remitted the rest. Doesn't this suggest that private and SOS related were intermingled? And more important that private users had access to her job related e mail server and account?
There is no rule that FOI requests must be limited to only those requests that can be honored in a few minutes.
That does not change the time spent on a freedom of information request. The Republican National Committee could file that request regardless of where the emails were stored. There is no particular reason the RNC needs them as a part of the investigation either. They're just trying to dig up dirt above and beyond what the internal investigation is already looking for. Which coincidentally is a good reason to have a private email server for personal correspondence with non-classified information. It would actually save some time on a freedom of information request by not requiring staff to sift through trivial nonsense.
Several problems with your assertions. The problem is that Hillary used a private unsecured server as her only email server. That is not in question. Hillary has admitted as much and State has confirmed. It is not up to you or I to decide what is pertinent to the investigation and neither Hillary nor State has been forthcoming as to the location and content of the emails. First denying they ever existed, then that they were not sensitive or classified, than that they were classified after Hillary received them. Now it's just too much bother to retrieve them.
Regarding separate emails for private and public e mails, that's not only a good idea, that's what supposed to happen. Hillary didn't do that. Hillary did not use two e mail servers. In fact one her excuses was that she had already gone through her emails (which apparently didn't take 75 years) and deleted only personal e mails and remitted the rest. Doesn't this suggest that private and SOS related were intermingled? And more important that private users had access to her job related e mail server and account?
There is no rule that FOI requests must be limited to only those requests that can be honored in a few minutes.