• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republicans Subpoena James Comey and Loretta Lynch Over Clinton Email Case

Its a game. They will demand public hearings where they can filibuster And produce no answers, and they will refuse private meetings where the rubber hits the road and tough questions are answered. The putpose being to set the table for refusals by the Trump administration who wont be cooperating with the new House committees.

Kabuki.

That much you got right.
 
Collusion probably not, obstruction of justice, oh ya!

Yeah well I wouldn't bank on that. The only reason he has the illusion of success is laundering "Rushers" money....
 
Bull****.

Have you forgotten the text messages? The memos? The FISA application? Have you forgotten the demands for information from the House AND the Senate that have been resisted by the DOJ and FBI? Have you forgotten all of the people who have been summoned to the House and Senate committees? The people...including Comey...who "can't remember", "can't answer because of an ongoing investigation", "can't answer because of security concerns"?

Your nonsense about Republicans not wanting to look into the Obama administration corruption is total bull****.

You are a prime example of my sig (see below)

Didn't an IG already look into most of that stuff and zero criminal wrong doing was found? Hence no indictments.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Of course they shouldn't agree to a closed hearing. If they do, they'll be forced to answer questions they'd rather not answer.

Of course they shouldn't agree to a closed hearing. Given the highly edited and slanted 'reports' issued by the tRump lapdogs in the past why would ANYONE sit through a lame duck closed door with the Republicants????


Why all of a sudden do the Republicants feel the need to do this??? It is nothing more than a last grasp political stunt.

Let's all wave bahbye to the losers and get some of those checks and balanced the rabid right barked about soooo much when Obama was in office... :peace
 
Yeah well I wouldn't bank on that. The only reason he has the illusion of success is laundering "Rushers" money....

oh I got my money on obstruction, Trump makes Nixon look like an amateur
 
oh I got my money on obstruction, Trump makes Nixon look like an amateur

I'm not disagreeing with you 2wholly, I'm saying I think when it comes out, "collusion" will be quite clear. There is much Mueller knows that we don't and if you look in the right places, a good case already exists, despite the right's denial.

IDK about Nixon being an ametuer. Nixon, I believe, for all his flaws was at heart a patriot, a crook, but he cared about America. Trump is an idiot who cares about Trump. Sure looks like a rank ametuer wanna be mob boss to me. I bet Putin's crowd has a lot of belly laughs at his expense privatley.
 
oh I got my money on obstruction, Trump makes Nixon look like an amateur
Obama: We don't need no stinkin plumbers we got the DOJ, FBI, CIA, FISA Court to spy for us and Mueller to provide cover.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm saying I think when it comes out, "collusion" will be quite clear. There is much Mueller knows that we don't and if you look in the right places, a good case already exists, despite the right's denial.

I dont expect impeachment. A thorough kicking to the curb in 2020 will suffice.
 
Didn't an IG already look into most of that stuff and zero criminal wrong doing was found? Hence no indictments.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

MyCroft is a Qanon CT theorist; you think he's interested in reality as you and I know it?:mrgreen::lamo:2rofll:
 
I dont expect impeachment. A thorough kicking to the curb in 2020 will suffice.

I do, because once the GOP sees how it will cost them, they will turn on him faster than they did on Dubya or McCain. Oh it will be fun when the senate turns on Trump, and if the evidence is damning enough to cost enough votes and/or significant donor support, and it will, the midterms showed them it already is), it's gonna be like watching GOT's and Ramsey Bolton's hounds after 7 days of starrvation, pretty damn sweet, and exactly what the Trump family deserves.
 
Didn't an IG already look into most of that stuff and zero criminal wrong doing was found? Hence no indictments.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Sure. I'll correct you.

Some of that has been looked at by the IG. Some of it is still being looked at by the IG. The IG did find criminal wrong doing and that has been referred to the DOJ. Think McCabe. Some of the people who have been fired from the FBI and the DOJ is a result of the IG investigations. There may be more.

In any case, the IG is irrelevant because we are talking about House subcommittee investigations.
 
MyCroft is a Qanon CT theorist; you think he's interested in reality as you and I know it?:mrgreen::lamo:2rofll:

Of course I'm not interested in reality as you know it. Your reality is based on leftwing multimedia echo chamber narrative. Mine is based on fact.

btw, you shouldn't lie about me. From what I've seen, Qanon is just as bad as your leftwing narrative...except it's from the rightwing. I see very little fact in Qanon.
 
Obama: We don't need no stinkin plumbers we got the DOJ, FBI, CIA, FISA Court to spy for us and Mueller to provide cover.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

BINGO!!!

Especially the Mueller part.
 
Of course I'm not interested in reality as you know it. Your reality is based on leftwing multimedia echo chamber narrative. Mine is based on fact.

btw, you shouldn't lie about me. From what I've seen, Qanon is just as bad as your leftwing narrative...except it's from the rightwing. I see very little fact in Qanon.

You were the one directed me to some Qanon video one time, IDK what it was, some mindless politcal porn propaganda gobbledy guck your deluded little self subscibes to, was so ****ing stupid I could't make it though, so perhaps I was mistaken about you an Qanon, but yeah your "Alternative facts", are at best very loosely based on facts, but your worldview is mostly al-right politcal porn, and your credibility is, well, not credible.
 
I'm not disagreeing with you 2wholly, I'm saying I think when it comes out, "collusion" will be quite clear. There is much Mueller knows that we don't and if you look in the right places, a good case already exists, despite the right's denial.

IDK about Nixon being an ametuer. Nixon, I believe, for all his flaws was at heart a patriot, a crook, but he cared about America. Trump is an idiot who cares about Trump. Sure looks like a rank ametuer wanna be mob boss to me. I bet Putin's crowd has a lot of belly laughs at his expense privatley.

I agree, but Nixon was so paranoid. He had a grudge against the media, and was under the assumption the Justice Dept should cover his ass. Sound familiar?
 
Obama: We don't need no stinkin plumbers we got the DOJ, FBI, CIA, FISA Court to spy for us and Mueller to provide cover.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

And that has what to do with Trumps obvious obstruction?

but...but...emails...benghazi...emails
 
I agree, but Nixon was so paranoid. He had a grudge against the media, and was under the assumption the Justice Dept should cover his ass. Sound familiar?

Yeah, typical alcoholic, being sober in AA myself, I know it well. Trump is so for other reasons.
 
Bob Goodlatte, Republican House Judiciary Committee committee’s chairman has issued subpoenas for James B. Comey, and Loretta E. Lynch, the former attorney general, as part of an investigation into their handling of inquiries into Hillary Clinton’s email server. The Republican House has approximately ten days between their being in control and the flipping of the House. Suddenly they feel that now is the time to get to the bottom of the Clinton email investigation? After that they can jump right into another investigation of Benghazi. This investigation is pure nonsense. Neither James Comey or Loretta Lynch should ever agree to a closed hearing.

o0ujojz.jpg
 
Bob Goodlatte, Republican House Judiciary Committee committee’s chairman has issued subpoenas for James B. Comey, and Loretta E. Lynch, the former attorney general, as part of an investigation into their handling of inquiries into Hillary Clinton’s email server. The Republican House has approximately ten days between their being in control and the flipping of the House. Suddenly they feel that now is the time to get to the bottom of the Clinton email investigation? After that they can jump right into another investigation of Benghazi. This investigation is pure nonsense. Neither James Comey or Loretta Lynch should ever agree to a closed hearing.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/22/us/politics/james-comey-loretta-lynch-subpoena.html

Republicans Subpoena James Comey and Loretta Lynch Over Clinton Email Case

The House Judiciary Committee has issued subpoenas for James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, and Loretta E. Lynch, the former attorney general, as part of an investigation into their handling of inquiries into Hillary Clinton’s email server and possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The subpoenas, issued on Wednesday by Representative Robert W. Goodlatte of Virginia, the committee’s chairman and a Republican, require Mr. Comey and Ms. Lynch to appear in closed-door sessions with members of Mr. Goodlatte’s committee and the Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Mr. Comey has been called to appear on Dec. 3, and Ms. Lynch a day later.

On Twitter, Mr. Comey objected to the format that Republicans are demanding for the interview. “I’m still happy to sit in the light and answer all questions,” he said. “But I will resist a ‘closed door’ thing because I’ve seen enough of their selective leaking and distortion. Let’s have a hearing and invite everyone to see.”

Several Republicans have said they believe that Mr. Comey and Ms. Lynch were part of a deeply rooted bias within the F.B.I. and the Justice Department that allowed Ms. Clinton to escape prosecution for her use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. The Republicans have also alleged impropriety in the origins of the investigation into the Trump campaign’s connections to Russia.

With Democrats seizing the majority in the House in the midterm elections — and preparing their own wave of subpoenas against Trump administration officials — House Republicans have a short window to press their case against Mr. Comey and Ms. Lynch.

Sadfully we've already seen this play before.Any Obama toadie will either defy a
subpoena,or use some excuse to stall an appearance.Or Lynch will simply do as she did when
called before Congress to answer for her Agency.She won't answer but instead rely on constant use
of " I will Refer you to " and blah blah blah.Meaning a coached and rehearsed non answer.
Refusing to give a plain yes or no.Lynch was chosen as AG for just this reason.She will follow
to the letter all Obama's coded marching orders and then dummy-up if need be.
Whereas Holder got caught in a huge Lie and ended up being convicted of Contempt of Congress.
The Only active American Cabinet member to be found in Contempt of Congress.
It was Lynch as Attorney general who had the direct responsibility to Charge Hillary Clinton
or make the Announcement as to what the Investigation conclusion was.NOT James Comey.
Plus Comey was not even at Hillary's Saturday FBI Interview.Where there was no transcript
or Video used to capture the Interview.Unprecedented.Plus Cheryl Mills was allowed
to be at that Interview { Not allowed } as Hillary's Lawyer.
Mills was Hillary's Chief-of-Staff at the time ... Not her counsel.
 
You were the one directed me to some Qanon video one time, IDK what it was, some mindless politcal porn propaganda gobbledy guck your deluded little self subscibes to, was so ****ing stupid I could't make it though, so perhaps I was mistaken about you an Qanon, but yeah your "Alternative facts", are at best very loosely based on facts, but your worldview is mostly al-right politcal porn, and your credibility is, well, not credible.

???

I have never posted anything from Qanon. You obviously have me confused with someone else.
 
Yeah, Obummer appointed Mueller. You and "facts"....:lamo:2rofll::2rofll:

When did I say Muller was appointed by "Obummer"? (I assume you mean Obama)
 
And that has what to do with Trumps obvious obstruction?

but...but...emails...benghazi...emails

The real question is...what does your fantasy about Trump have to do with this thread?
 
Back
Top Bottom