:lol:
Anything from any real sites?
Obama promised change, he has shown none
shows how little the Republican run congress actually cared about Bi-partisanship and oversight.
Your rhetorical vomit has no limits, eh?
Homsexual jihad? Are you serious? Do you not have any rhetorical restraint? So you see some level of equivalence between Muslims terrorists killing civilians and Republicans possessing a moral judgment against homsexuality? What are they doing to you people there in the EU?
Given that no such jihad exist your feigned surprise is meaningless. The WH can grant a pass to who ever the hell they want to.
Rather, the only thing you care about is that a pro-Republican individual was at all allowed into the WH press room.
Meanwhile, I have not seen you express any outrage or surprise that Obama prescreens and preselectes journalists before conducting a presser.
The only thing wrong with it was that Gannon was able to successfully dupe a press room official into granting a credential. Beyond that all we have is your vapid rhetorical vomit all over the floor here.
They possess the same level of care about bipartisanship and oversight as the Democrats do.
Your point is...what?
It seems to be that the Republicans are so much worse than the Democrats. You could argue that based on your actual policy preferences, but not when discussing the exercise of political power.
Look, we have Pelosi very opely declaring that she has no use for bipartisanship...and why would she? She and the Dems believe that they were awarded a broad political mandate.
I'm not sure why you're playing this little game, Pete.
You know that the California amendment that banned same-sex marriage was passed primarly on the support of blacks and hispanics that came out to vote for Obama -- right?As for the US rights treatment of the homosexual community?.. Open your eyes. Prop 8....
So... when The Obama and the Dems campaigned on 'changing the partisan nature of Washington' -- did they lie?Because the right on these boards and the Republicans in the media are crying like babies that there is no Bi-Partisanship. Of course there is no bi-partisanship after a decade in the political wilderness.. why should there be? .
^^^^After all it is the Republicans fault that the whole country is in the crapper
The Dems are making a strategic political mistake. I'm actually happy that the Dems are shutting out Republican members. It simply puts the lie to the Obama claims that he's open to bipartisanship and it lets us hang this iron anvil from their necks. .
Come on, Rev. Look, it is neither a surprise nor improper for one party to shut the other out. In fact, it is routine and simply an exercise of legislative power. Look, the Democrats won and they are going to craft the stimulus bill as they want to.
The Dems are making a strategic political mistake. When this stimulus fails to do any of what the Dems are promising it will do the Dems will not be able to hide under the bipartisanship banner no matter that losers like Snowe, Collins, and Spectre are playing hangers-on.
I'm actually happy that the Dems are shutting out Republican members. It simply puts the lie to the Obama claims that he's open to bipartisanship and it lets us hang this iron anvil from their necks. The Republicans couldn't fundmamentally alter this spending bill anyway and pecking at the edges only gives the Dems a political advantage.
Of course, on this point, you are correct.
This is probably the closest thread that I've found today to bring up another point: It's not only the Republicans who are shut out of the opportunity to review the so-called "stimulus package". All American political pundits, interested citizens, and also open-minded Democrats (big assumption there) are denied adequate time to read and review the final bill (or recent drafts) that they will vote on very shortly. This is a demonstration of Pelosi's and Read's (likely with Obama's approval) big lie to the American people. Campaign rhetoric had the Democrats promising that all legislation would be out in the open, available to be read and reviewed before voting took place. This bill is being withheld not only from Republican politicians, but from all Americans. All we hear are rumors of a possible healthcare IT package thrown in at a time when the urgency of the need for this so-called stimulus might allow dangerous legislation to sneak in without adequate review. There are many truly moderate Democrats that might vote against some of the individual proposals of the bill if they were separated and clarified to the public beforehand.
Hey jihad is only another word for crusade. Not my problem you find it insulting or whatever.
As for the US rights treatment of the homosexual community?..
Open your eyes.
Prop 8, banning books with supposed homosexual references to denying homosexual couples the same rights as hetro sexual couples.. yes the religious right in the Republican party and hence the Republican party are in a jihad against the homosexual community.. or if you would rather have I can use the word crusade if that is less offensive.
Yes they can, and you still dont find it odd that a man with fake papers got access to the press room for years, and was allowed time and time again to ask snowball questions to among others President Bush.
Either there was a monumental cluster**** that was repeated time and time again, or he was "let in" by the people in power.
I could care less if he was a pro-republican or pro-democrat person. The point is, that the right can not claim lack of bi-partisanship by the democrats when them, themselves for years did very little to act bi-partisan themselves, and in fact "stacked" the deck in their favour and this Gannon guy is just one example.
So? Bush did the same, when he actually held a presser. He also stacked all events with "his people".
This is a widely known fact about your dear leader. Again I dont have a big issue with it, but you cant go around claiming that a presser is "open" and free, when we all know it is not. I have not heard that Obama claims this.
Yes finaly you admit that was wrong,
but you do not go further to ask why it happened.. Someone duped... for years?
I mean how stupid do you think we all are?
By your claim, anyone with no relation to any media organisation, can get a press pass on a fake name and enter the same room as the US president.... YEA RIGHT!...
Guess under the Bush administration, all the terrorists had to do was get a White House press pass to assassinate the US president.. DAMN they are dumb.
Face it, the reason Republicans weren't included was the Democrats didn't want the details to get to the public and did not want any desent.Exactly. Obama reached out by baming Republicans for this economy, when he had an integral part in the policies that led to the mortgage crisis.
Pelosi changes house rules that Republicans put in to allow alternative bills to be introduced...
You mean like that?
Because the right on these boards and the Republicans in the media are crying like babies that there is no Bi-Partisanship. Of course there is no bi-partisanship after a decade in the political wilderness.. why should there be? After all it is the Republicans fault that the whole country is in the crapper.
Obama took office hoping to unite the parties in a bipartisan government. He went to Congress, met with Republicans, even had them over to the White House for cookies. He asked for their ideas and set up a framework to work together. But the Republicans don't want to work together. They rejected Obama and then claimed they were "shut out". This president has and continues to make a serious effort to include Republicans. Republicans have decided they don't want to be included, they want to be a government in exile.
Obama took office hoping to unite the parties in a bipartisan government. He went to Congress, met with Republicans, even had them over to the White House for cookies. He asked for their ideas and set up a framework to work together. But the Republicans don't want to work together. They rejected Obama and then claimed they were "shut out". This president has and continues to make a serious effort to include Republicans. Republicans have decided they don't want to be included, they want to be a government in exile.
If you were able to find out about it, I'm sure they were able to find out about it as well. :roll:
Democrats.Bipartisanship requires compromise. Which group is unwilling to compromise?
Democrats.
Who put the tax cuts in the stimulus bill?
Bush took office hoping to unite the parties in a bipartisan government. He went to Congress, met with Democrats, even had them over to the White House for cookies. He asked for their ideas and set up a framework to work together. But the Democrats didn't want to work together. They rejected Bush and then claimed they were "shut out". This president has and continues to make a serious effort to include Democrats. Democrats had decided they didn't want to be included, they wanted to be a government in exile.
Bipartisanship requires compromise. Which group is unwilling to compromise?
Difficult to explain basic economics to someone who refuses to think. Basically, EVERY civilized nation from Rome onward TAXED its citizens to build revenue, SPENT that revenue on public works and the military, and PRINTED money out of usually worthless metal to create a single barter system. And they became prosperous. There is your answer, but I'm sure you still refuse to get it, it's way too much fun to disconnect your brain and pretend you know everything, isn't it?
Who put the tax cuts in the stimulus bill?
If so, you're as intellectually dishonest as Pete is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?