You are not the humble servant of the definition of progressive taxation.I am but a humble servant of the data. You might profit from familiarizing yourself with it.
Then why on earth did you present that statement as if I had?
You are not the humble servant of the definition of progressive taxation.
Progressive Tax Definition | Investopedia
I forgot, you like yanking my chain. BYEOn the contrary. The definition in your link says just what I've been posting, and as a bonus points out that the US tax system is progressive. Thanks for buttressing my point.eace
Since it has no basis in the Constitution an amendment to make it constitutional is the only way it could be.This site will allow you to read the law on Social Security. No amendment was necessary.
So you made an odd statement and expected no response?It was a very odd statement to make, that's all. No big deal.
Yes. I was in obvious error. My apologies.So you made an odd statement and expected no response?
Hah.
That is not the way any nation works.
And we have a US Supreme COurt to decide issues of constitutionality and they have done so.
6. Law is the expression of the general will. Every citizen has a right to participate personally, or through his representative, in its foundation. It must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal in the eyes of the law, are equally eligible to all dignities and to all public positions and occupations, according to their abilities, and without distinction except that of their virtues and talents.
Since it has no basis in the Constitution an amendment to make it constitutional is the only way it could be.
You are lawless. Do you believe it is okay because we have done it for a long time?
In the Declaration of the Rights of Man it says,
In the case of Obamacare, people and groups with influence are exempt from the law while others are bound by it, whether they want it or not. Do you not see any erosion here or do you just assume that Rights in the democracies will continue under the good will of its leaders?
The people who are responsible for that determination decided otherwise.
All hail our infallible and beneficent wise overlords.
Your appreciation for our nation, its people and our Constitutional system of government is less than impressive and reveals a stinging contempt of elitist superiority at its core.
I said nothing about the nation, it's people, or the Constitution. I was speaking only of our wise and beneficent overlords.
One cannot separate our government from our nation and its people ..... after our the USA is a nation which has a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
You're mistaken. America is governed by the federal government, not the people.
You're mistaken. America is governed by the federal government, not the people.
It is very sad that there are people on the right who have succumbed to that false belief. Or perhaps they are trying to promote that false belief as part of a far more nefarious agenda.
You're mistaken. America is governed by the federal government, not the people.
You're seriously proposing that the federal government is NOT the government of America?
I used to find it absolutely amazing a few weeks ago how you could take something I said and distort it, twist it and pervert to come back and say something that had nothing to do with what I actually said.
I no longer am amazed. Far from it.
Good thing the Feds were running the government during WW2..As for lazy-unfair during Kal Koolidge, some people like the KKK were ruining the Nation with Prohibition..How'd that work out..
I said that America is governed by the federal government.
You called this a false belief.
Therefore it is reasonable for me to deduce that you don't think that the federal government is the government of America.
Good thing the Feds were running the government during WW2..As for lazy-unfair during Kal Koolidge, some people like the KKK were ruining the Nation with Prohibition..How'd that work out..
After think this over and coming down on each side of this a few times, I tend to think you are right to a certain extent. America is indeed governed by the ever expanding and more powerful federal government. State power has become fairly non-existent to where a state is nothing more than lines drawn on a map. But the people could change this if they so choose to do so. They do not have to keep sending the same people and the same political parties back to Washington to rule over them if they really desired not to do so. So if the federal government rules over the people and in a lot of instances goes against the peoples wishes, who fault is it that we let them do it? People are satisfied with being told what to do by those who say they know what is best for them. This way they do not have to decide what is best for them themselves. They just follow the dictates of Washington.
There was a reason the framers put into the Constitution what powers the government/congress had and what powers they did not. Then to make sure it was understood they added the bit that if the power is not listed, that power resides in the hands of the states or to the people.
We were once a republic where the people were represented by the House of Representatives which the people voted directly for. The states were represented by the senate, which the senators were to be chosen by the state, its legislature or its governor to represent the states and the states interests, not the people of the states. The 17th amendment change this to where today senators are not representing their states, they are just another House of representatives with a set of different rules.
The president was to be chosen by a set of electors where each state would decide how to elect them. But I guess the bottom line is that we have moved away from the Republic and more into a direct democracy which diluted the powers of the states and in that vacuum the federal gladly stepped in to where they are now omnipowerful and that power continues to grow unabated.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?