• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden

Well, you do appear entirely incapable of digesting the investigation's report.

Is this a Q thing?
Are you back from building that gate in your big, beautiful wall?
 
Well, we now have more confirmation that the FBI had no evidence to support that Flynn was a Russian agent.

And we now know the information Steele compiled (which in turn was used to support the general claim of conspiracy, and a specific allegation against Page) was sourced from a Russian intelligence officer.

In other words, there was nothing to obstruct.
Don't recall a charge that Flynn was an actual agent as much as a useful idiot for the Russians. He certainly wasn't investigated for and charged with anything like that. Steele had many sources for his report so it's no surprise and not at all improper for him to have used such a source. After all, that's where the smoke was coming from so it's where he'd try to find the fire. Steele basically turned his raw material over to, first, the person who commissioned his work--the Florida Republican and Rubio backer, Paul Singer. When he stopped funding it, Fusion GPS picked up the tab for it and then later the DNC. IIRC, Steele did offer his assessment of the validity of some of the material. For example, not very much for the Russian hookers peeing on the bed the Obamas slept on in Moscow so Dirtbag could watch. If your goal is to relitigate all of this in an effort to keep trying to pretend that there weren't multiple interactions between the Dirtbag campaign and Russian agents the Mueller Report gives the lie to that.
 
Don't recall a charge that Flynn was an actual agent as much as a useful idiot for the Russians. He certainly wasn't investigated for and charged with anything like that. Steele had many sources for his report so it's no surprise and not at all improper for him to have used such a source. After all, that's where the smoke was coming from so it's where he'd try to find the fire. Steele basically turned his raw material over to, first, the person who commissioned his work--the Florida Republican and Rubio backer, Paul Singer. When he stopped funding it, Fusion GPS picked up the tab for it and then later the DNC. IIRC, Steele did offer his assessment of the validity of some of the material. For example, not very much for the Russian hookers peeing on the bed the Obamas slept on in Moscow so Dirtbag could watch. If your goal is to relitigate all of this in an effort to keep trying to pretend that there weren't multiple interactions between the Dirtbag campaign and Russian agents the Mueller Report gives the lie to that.

Flynn wasn't charged for ANYTHING involving his role in a conspiracy with Russia to fix the 2016.
He was investigated, and cleared, for working on behalf of Russia.

We now know that Steele relied upon one person for the bulk of his report-- and that guy had been investigated as being a Russian agent. Great source.

The claim against Trump was that he had conspired with Russia, not that Russia had reached out to his campaign. Mueller and the Senate report also said Russia reached out to the campaign. And both said no conspiracy.
As we now know, Russia also reached out to the Clinton campaign.
 
Flynn wasn't charged for ANYTHING involving his role in a conspiracy with Russia to fix the 2016.
He was investigated, and cleared, for working on behalf of Russia.
Yeah. So?

We now know that Steele relied upon one person for the bulk of his report-- and that guy had been investigated as being a Russian agent. Great source.
Maybe. Maybe not. Again, so?
The claim against Trump was that he had conspired with Russia, not that Russia had reached out to his campaign. Mueller and the Senate report also said Russia reached out to the campaign. And both said no conspiracy.
But both cited multiple cases of "cooperation" and "coordination."
As we now know, Russia also reached out to the Clinton campaign.
You'll need to supply a reliable source (i.e., not from whatever right wing puke funnels you usually use) for that one.
Rather than continue this bit-by-bit haggling over this matter here are two lengthy sources that summarize all the facts about Russian meddling on Dirtbag's behalf during the 2016 campaign. I know you won't actually read them since they're factual but at least I can say that I've led you to the facts but I can't make you stop the mischaracterizing them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#Steele's_sources
https://time.com/5565991/russia-influence-2016-election/
 
You'll need to supply a reliable source (i.e., not from whatever right wing puke funnels you usually use) for that one.
Rather than continue this bit-by-bit haggling over this matter here are two lengthy sources that summarize all the facts about Russian meddling on Dirtbag's behalf during the 2016 campaign. I know you won't actually read them since they're factual but at least I can say that I've led you to the facts but I can't make you stop the mischaracterizing them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#Steele's_sources
https://time.com/5565991/russia-influence-2016-election/


You cited it yourself-- the Steele dossier a document generated for the Clinton campaign. The information that Mr. Steele used came from Russian sources.
We now know the main source, Mr. Danchenko, has said his info was just gossip, and that in any event he himself had been investigated for being a Russian agent.
 
You cited it yourself-- the Steele dossier a document generated for the Clinton campaign. The information that Mr. Steele used came from Russian sources.
We now know the main source, Mr. Danchenko, has said his info was just gossip, and that in any event he himself had been investigated for being a Russian agent.
As predicted, you couldn't allow yourself to read the factual record of the Steele dossier. You've been told many times over that the origin of that dossier was at the behest of and financed by anti-Trump Paul Singer, a Rubio backer but you continue to lie about that. From that lie springs all the rest of the lies you continue to spread. Of course, the Dems took it over once Singer stopped paying for it. It was evidence for your Dirtbag's campaign cooperation and coordination with Russian assets which continued and intensified on June 9, 2016 when Dirtbag, Jr. met with several Russians in Dirtbag Tower to get more promised dirt on Clinton:
The emails, released by Donald Trump Jr., are the most concrete evidence yet that Trump campaign officials welcomed Russian help to win the election, a subject that has cast a cloud over Trump’s presidency and spurred investigations by the Justice Department and Congress.

The messages show that the younger Trump was open to the prospect of “very high level and sensitive information” from a Russian attorney that a go-between described as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump” ahead of a meeting on June 9, 2016.

"If it's what you say I love it," Trump Jr. responded. He released the messages on Twitter after the New York Times said it planned to write about them and sought comment from him. (bit.ly/2uapeCK and bit.ly/2ua9hwg)
Big Dirtbag himself told the whole country what was going on when he let it out of the bag:

And listening it was. Just a few hours later Putin dumped the stolen DNC documents onto Wikileaks. Nahh, no coordination or cooperation there. Also, our moon really is made of cheese.
 
As predicted, you couldn't allow yourself to read the factual record of the Steele dossier. You've been told many times over that the origin of that dossier was at the behest of and financed by anti-Trump Paul Singer, a Rubio backer but you continue to lie about that. From that lie springs all the rest of the lies you continue to spread. Of course, the Dems took it over once Singer stopped paying for it. It was evidence for your Dirtbag's campaign cooperation and coordination with Russian assets which continued and intensified on June 9, 2016 when Dirtbag, Jr. met with several Russians in Dirtbag Tower to get more promised dirt on Clinton:

Big Dirtbag himself told the whole country what was going on when he let it out of the bag:

And listening it was. Just a few hours later Putin dumped the stolen DNC documents onto Wikileaks. Nahh, no coordination or cooperation there. Also, our moon really is made of cheese.


Steele wasn't hired until Rubio was no longer a client. Steele's work was for the Clinton campaign.

We have known for quite some time that the dossier was uncorroborated. We now much of it comes from a man who the FBI had investigated for being a Russian agent.
 
Steele wasn't hired until Rubio was no longer a client. Steele's work was for the Clinton campaign.
That's still a lie no matter how many times you say it and ignore the proof you've been given multiple times. I never expect trumpers to stop lying. After all, the lie is essential to their cult loyalty since their dear leader is a pathological liar. Therefore emulating that lying is order #1 from that cult.

We have known for quite some time that the dossier was uncorroborated. We now much of it comes from a man who the FBI had investigated for being a Russian agent.
"We" being only the Cult of Dirtbag. Normal people have known that some of the dossier was corroborated by other investigations and the rest was unverified (i.e. neither confirmed nor debunked):
Some aspects of the dossier have been corroborated,[29][30] in particular its main allegations that Putin and Russia actively favored Trump over Clinton[31][23] and that many Trump campaign officials and associates had multiple secret contacts with Russians.[32][33] However, many allegations in the dossier remain unverified, and one allegation against Michael Cohen was dismissed by the Mueller Report.[34] The Daily Telegraph has reported that anonymous sources believe Russian intelligence agencies may have sought to create doubt about the veracity of the dossier.[35]
The rightwing puke funnel that serves as your only misinformation source has been essential in help those Russian efforts to create that doubt so that you can keep coming on fora like this and keep spreading their and Donnie Dirtbag's lies. How does it feel to be a willing dupe of a murdering despot like Putin? Here's what it looks like: Un-American to the max. Whenever you flag waving phonies pretend to be patriotic it makes the country weaker.
 
That's still a lie no matter how many times you say it and ignore the proof you've been given multiple times. I never expect trumpers to stop lying. After all, the lie is essential to their cult loyalty since their dear leader is a pathological liar. Therefore emulating that lying is order #1 from that cult.


"We" being only the Cult of Dirtbag. Normal people have known that some of the dossier was corroborated by other investigations and the rest was unverified (i.e. neither confirmed nor debunked):

The rightwing puke funnel that serves as your only misinformation source has been essential in help those Russian efforts to create that doubt so that you can keep coming on fora like this and keep spreading their and Donnie Dirtbag's lies. How does it feel to be a willing dupe of a murdering despot like Putin? Here's what it looks like: Un-American to the max. Whenever you flag waving phonies pretend to be patriotic it makes the country weaker.

Your understanding of these events are woefully outdated.
We learned last week that the guy Steele used as a source had been investigated by the FBI as being a Russian agent.
Perhaps people like Steele and Comey were the real dupes of Putin.
 
Those socialists and communists under their beds must be keeping the Muslims, blacks, Mexicans and caravan riders company.
They're fat from living on welfare and food stamps, it makes for a comfortable squishy bed.
 
Like Trump wasn't exonerated (read the Mueller report) and could still be charged?
So what Mueller and democrats said was, we can't find evidence to prove wrongdoing but here in America that doesn't matter, we can't find evidence to prove he's innocent either.
 
WASHINGTON — An election-year investigation by Senate Republicans into corruption allegations against Joseph R. Biden Jr., the Democratic presidential nominee, and his son, Hunter, involving Ukraine found no evidence of improper influence or wrongdoing by the former vice president, bringing to a close a highly politicized inquiry its leaders had hoped would tarnish President Trump’s rival.

Such a waste. My position on this from the start has been "if Republicans truly believed there was something criminal or unethical about Hunter Biden working abroad and gaining an economic advantage (quid pro quo) from using his father's name, they would have done something about it at ANY TIME BETWEEN 2008 - 2016." They didn't because there was nothing criminal or unethical about what he was doing.
 
Back
Top Bottom