• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rep. Eric Swalwell seems to have an answer for gun control

Lutherf

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
44,907
Reaction score
51,261
Location
Tucson, AZ
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1063527635114852352


Rep. Eric Swalwell
‏Verified account @RepSwalwell
Replying to @Rambobiggs

And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.
12:22 PM - 16 Nov 2018

Nukes, huh? Well, Eric, I suppose that is an option. I'm not so sure you'll get a lot of backing for that idea but having a sitting Congressman so much as suggest such an option is, in a word, disturbing.
 

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
48,060
Reaction score
35,176
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I’m thinking this will come back to bite in spades.........Twitter & politicians; what could go wrong?
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
30,510
Reaction score
15,321
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Swalwell and Cardillo are both moron zealots.

John Cardillo
John Cardillo
@johncardillo
Make no mistake, Democrats want to eradicate the Second Amendment, ban and seize all guns, and have all power rest with the state.

These people are dangerously obsessed with power.


Rep. Eric Swalwell
Rep. Eric Swalwell
@RepSwalwell
Replying to
@WalshFreedom
Joe, it’s sarcasm. He said he’s going to war with America if gun legislation was passed. I told him his government has nukes. God forbid we use sarcasm

Really stupid, tone deaf sarcasm.
 
Last edited:

Bullseye

All Lives Matter or No Lives Matter
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
41,029
Reaction score
14,503
Location
San Diego
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other

zsu2357

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
8,749
Reaction score
3,713
Location
The late great Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1063527635114852352




Nukes, huh? Well, Eric, I suppose that is an option. I'm not so sure you'll get a lot of backing for that idea but having a sitting Congressman so much as suggest such an option is, in a word, disturbing.
Maybe that is a new gun law Kalistan is kicking around. I'm sure this will be remembered next voting cycle. He should be kicked to the curb now.
 

TurtleDude

warrior of the wetlands
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
281,619
Reaction score
100,380
Location
Ohio
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1063527635114852352



Nukes, huh? Well, Eric, I suppose that is an option. I'm not so sure you'll get a lot of backing for that idea but having a sitting Congressman so much as suggest such an option is, in a word, disturbing.

He's obviously mentally ill and someone who makes comments like that should not hold public office.

he also proves why the founders were so wise and why the second amendment is so important
 

Media_Truth

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
11,375
Reaction score
2,648
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1063527635114852352




Nukes, huh? Well, Eric, I suppose that is an option. I'm not so sure you'll get a lot of backing for that idea but having a sitting Congressman so much as suggest such an option is, in a word, disturbing.

Nothing like a partial quote to interpret a statement out of context.

Joe Biggs

@Rambobiggs
· 9h
So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your ****ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.

Rep. Eric Swalwell

@RepSwalwell
And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.


He's simply making a point that it's ridiculous for Gun-Owners to think they can battle some type of gone-rogue Government.
 

Media_Truth

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
11,375
Reaction score
2,648
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Eric Swalwell is DEAD ON with his assessment. These guns have no purpose in a civilized society. A SELL-BACK is a great idea.

The NRA has hijacked America, as is evident in these threads. The Conservative hero, Ronald Reagan wouldn't even make it through the Republican Primary today.

Reagan_Gun_Control.jpg
 

dogboy49

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
340
Reaction score
154
Location
United States
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Rep. Eric Swalwell
‏Verified account @RepSwalwell
Replying to @Rambobiggs

And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit..... 12:22 PM - 16 Nov 2018

A bit disturbing. Am I the only one who thinks this sounds like someone who considers armed citizens to be an enemy, to be subjugated regardless of cost?

From a different era, but I have never been able to get this phrase out of my head:

"'It became necessary to destroy the town to save it,' a United States major said today. He was talking about the decision by allied commanders to bomb and shell the town regardless of civilian casualties, to rout the Vietcong."

Written by Peter Arnett in the New York Times, 1968
 

Lutherf

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
44,907
Reaction score
51,261
Location
Tucson, AZ
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Nothing like a partial quote to interpret a statement out of context.

Joe Biggs

@Rambobiggs
· 9h
So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your ****ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.

Rep. Eric Swalwell

@RepSwalwell
And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.


He's simply making a point that it's ridiculous for Gun-Owners to think they can battle some type of gone-rogue Government.

He's doing more than that. He's implying supremacy of the government over the citizens and he is also implying that the government can and should use force against the people if the people resist that supremacy. It's about as anti-American as a government official can get.
 

Media_Truth

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
11,375
Reaction score
2,648
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
He's doing more than that. He's implying supremacy of the government over the citizens and he is also implying that the government can and should use force against the people if the people resist that supremacy. It's about as anti-American as a government official can get.

No he's not.
 

Media_Truth

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
11,375
Reaction score
2,648
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
A bit disturbing. Am I the only one who thinks this sounds like someone who considers armed citizens to be an enemy, to be subjugated regardless of cost?

From a different era, but I have never been able to get this phrase out of my head:

"'It became necessary to destroy the town to save it,' a United States major said today. He was talking about the decision by allied commanders to bomb and shell the town regardless of civilian casualties, to rout the Vietcong."

Written by Peter Arnett in the New York Times, 1968

Yes, I think that guns that kill masses of people in a short period time are the enemy of a civilized society. Australia is a better country, after outlawing them.
 

dogboy49

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
340
Reaction score
154
Location
United States
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Yes, I think that guns that kill masses of people in a short period time are the enemy of a civilized society. Australia is a better country, after outlawing them.

Personally, I think that automobiles are the enemy of a civilized society.

I also think that Australia has always been a nice country, and hasn't changed much since changing their gun laws.
 

Marvan Buren

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2016
Messages
79
Reaction score
31
Location
New Jersey
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
He's doing more than that. He's implying supremacy of the government over the citizens and he is also implying that the government can and should use force against the people if the people resist that supremacy. It's about as anti-American as a government official can get.

Actually, Swallwell's just stating the obvious although he should have realized how easy it is to take comments out of context. Perhaps, he should have just referred to armed drones, tanks and air power instead of nukes. When the 2nd Amendment was written, a well regulated militia defending their homes could hold off a much larger army. With today's weapons, they would be wiped out before they could even fire a shot.
 

Rucker61

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
23,998
Reaction score
16,145
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Yes, I think that guns that kill masses of people in a short period time are the enemy of a civilized society. Australia is a better country, after outlawing them.

We've had mass shootings with semi-automatic rifles, semi-automatic pistols, semi-automatic shotguns, bolt action rifles, lever action rifle, pump action shotguns, double barrel shotguns, rimfire rifles, rimfire pistols, and revolvers. The UK had a mass shooting with a bolt action rimfire rifle.

France had a mass killing with a truck. Australia has had mass murders with a knife and with a hammer. New Zealand still allows ownership of semiautomatic rifles and has never had a mass shooting with one.

You have a lot of outlawing to do.
 

Rucker61

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
23,998
Reaction score
16,145
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Actually, Swallwell's just stating the obvious although he should have realized how easy it is to take comments out of context. Perhaps, he should have just referred to armed drones, tanks and air power instead of nukes. When the 2nd Amendment was written, a well regulated militia defending their homes could hold off a much larger army. With today's weapons, they would be wiped out before they could even fire a shot.

You haven't studied much Mao, have you?
 

Rucker61

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
23,998
Reaction score
16,145
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Nothing like a partial quote to interpret a statement out of context.

Joe Biggs

@Rambobiggs
· 9h
So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your ****ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.

Rep. Eric Swalwell

@RepSwalwell
And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.


He's simply making a point that it's ridiculous for Gun-Owners to think they can battle some type of gone-rogue Government.

What would happen to this gone-rogue government if Anonymous or similar published on the internet the names and addresses of every soldier and government employee, and the names, photos and schools of all of their children? Who would be leaving those homes to go fight other Americans?
 

Media_Truth

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
11,375
Reaction score
2,648
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
We've had mass shootings with semi-automatic rifles, semi-automatic pistols, semi-automatic shotguns, bolt action rifles, lever action rifle, pump action shotguns, double barrel shotguns, rimfire rifles, rimfire pistols, and revolvers. The UK had a mass shooting with a bolt action rimfire rifle.

France had a mass killing with a truck. Australia has had mass murders with a knife and with a hammer. New Zealand still allows ownership of semiautomatic rifles and has never had a mass shooting with one.

You have a lot of outlawing to do.

France and England don't have the issues that the US does...

gun-death-rates-chart.jpg
 

Media_Truth

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
11,375
Reaction score
2,648
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Personally, I think that automobiles are the enemy of a civilized society.

I also think that Australia has always been a nice country, and hasn't changed much since changing their gun laws.

duh...
 

Media_Truth

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
11,375
Reaction score
2,648
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
What would happen to this gone-rogue government if Anonymous or similar published on the internet the names and addresses of every soldier and government employee, and the names, photos and schools of all of their children? Who would be leaving those homes to go fight other Americans?

You will have to better explain your "Rogue Government" scenario. I'm not one of these Armageddon nutcases, and I don't espouse to armed citizenry having any effect whatsoever on a Rogue Government. Maybe that answers your question. Who knows?
 
Top Bottom