- Joined
- Jun 18, 2016
- Messages
- 22,220
- Reaction score
- 7,948
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No! The TED talk is relevant, because it focuses on our useless efforts to combat AGW.
I think your comment was that we cannot do nothing, we are not doing nothing, CO2 emissions in the US are falling
faster than in many nations who signed the Paris accord.
Are we to be judged by our emission reductions, or by our words saying we will reduce emissions, and how much money we give away?
The drop in human CO2 emission has been since 2007:
https://debatepolitics.com/threads/...en-biodiversity.417485/page-6#post-1072788336
Caused by the drop in coal generated energy since 2005:
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/...ate-change-greenhouse-gas-coal-transportation
Which has not achieved much toward the Paris Accord goals. Just because CO2 levels are dropping doesn’t mean we should abandon what else can be done to slow AGW.