I'd be more capable of believing you if you and your fellow anti-abortion worked as hard at making sure these "unborn", once born, didn't live in poverty, were educated, and given opportunities to contribute to society. But, of course, that takes money and since you've got yours, you don't give a d*** about that after they are born. Some protection.
Well, the 16 y/o girl could do what 16 year-old-girls had to do when I was 16. Marry the father or go off to visit an aunt for 6 months and give up the baby for adoption. Thankfully, we no longer live in that punitive time, but many Christo-fascists are determined to take us back there. What's next? Forbidding contraception? Forbidding women to vote? Keeping women the property, first of their fathers, then their husbands? I could keep on but, I have better things to do than repeat what any one with a brain that can compute has observed. Keeping women subject to the whims and laws of the men, their "betters" is their end-game.
The same folks who will tell you that none of the above will ever happen were telling us that Roe was not going to be overturned inside of 10 years ago.
Its ironic the Right warned us about those East Coast Elites, then they go and elect oneI wonder if anyone will blame it on "socialist universities" and medical schools training doctors to be Trumpist-hating soy boy librul coastal elites, or the like.
It's unsurprising and will unfortunately get more people killed (I morbidly wonder what the Dobbs body count will be). They are charged with doing no harm; with saving lives. Yet any number of these theocratic right wing states have restrictions that would prevent a procedure that may be medically necessary for that purpose. Worse, that leave the definition vague so as to create a chilling effect: not knowing what a jury might eventually decide and not wanting to wade through all the expense and worry of a criminal trial, docs simply avoid doing the procedure.
All in the name of forced birth of those who, once born, will be "persons" whom the GOP is not interested in protecting in the slightest. That would make them takers, you see.
Why? They should understand the law and abide by it. If they want to get into the abortion business then another state would be the way for them to go. Otherwise, not an issue at all.
Exactly ^^^^^^
No you don’t and GOPutins made abortion an ISSUE.
Concscience? It is a matter of common sense and morality.
Its ironic the Right warned us about those East Coast Elites, then they go and elect one
It's like Putin. It's a warning when they say they won't do something or don't believe in something. That means they're about to do it.Its ironic the Right warned us about those East Coast Elites, then they go and elect one
My step mother did that -- birthed her child and gave him up for adoption. She never got over it. Never.
I reject the very idea that being a mother is a “bad future” or “torpedoing the future”
I don’t view children as a “ramification of a poor life decision”
She made a better decision than abortion, but she should’ve raised her own child. At least she’s not a murderer however
