- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Go away,
You're argument was defeated long ago. In fact it was proven your comments are quite bigoted.
Translation: you still cant make an argument that has merit and is supported by facts. Please let us know when you can.
I'll admit it. Same sex couples can't procreate with one another. So what? You keep conflating marriage with procreation without proving why they should be tied to one another. You are starting with an unproven assumption.I am not saying any laws are based on procreation, I am pointing out that that is a difference. If you go back to the point I was making, it was that SS couples are different than OS couples, and a SSM is different from standard marriage. It seems that those that are for gay marriage refuse to admit that gay sex can not ever result in procreation. Just because people can't have children because of various reasons, doesn't mean that all couples can't have children. And if you have a union that, overall, in every instance, can't produce kids, then that is different from what a marriage is.
1.)No, really? Translation. I have no respect at all for your posts, they are, in my opinion, the least thought out and most shallow of anyone on these boards, that's why I rarely respond to you. Consider this a special treat. The energy I expend on these keystrokes is well beyond the value of your posts. To tell you the truth, I hardly ever read more than a line or two of your posts, they are so bereft of cohesive thought.
2.)Nothing personal, it's just a waste of my time.
LOL! Why, because you say so? As I said, my argument stands. Your bigoted one is corrupt.
Well, then leave me out of that argument. I was responding to someone that claimed SSM and normal marriage are exactly the same. I pointed out that SS couple can never produce a child. Had nothing to do with the law.
And again...they are exactly the same because a) as you've admitted, that is not a criteria for marriage and b) lots of straight couples can never produce a child (infertile, too old) and they apparently have 'normal' marriages.
Exactly the same, even tho you discount that gay couples DO procreate and have natural children in their families (in vitro, surrogate, from previous straight marriages)
The 'definition' of a family is obviously very fluid these days....and as you say...that doesnt really matter when legalizing a marriage...and yet gays still DO procreate and have the exact same families as many legally married straight ones.
So this is an excuse on your part, not a reason.
Well, then leave me out of that argument. I was responding to someone that claimed SSM and normal marriage are exactly the same. I pointed out that SS couple can never produce a child. Had nothing to do with the law.
You just can't accept the fact that it is significantly different. Fine, I can't repair that. Keep on with that 2+2=5 mentality. I've pretty much posted my view here, only other thing is that I believe this is a state issue, not a federal one, but that's been touched on too.
There was no social engineering involving gay people. People are just realizing that there is nothing wrong with being gay and happily living your life. These people aren't hurting society, and they do just as much of a good job raising children.
No - social engineering (or brainwashing) by people like you. As in progressives forcing people (mostly children in public schools) to adhere to your progressive ideologies, in an attempt to manufacture future progressives.
Progressives don't allow people to form their own political ideologies - progressives teach people what their ideology should be.
You ever see 1984?
You just can't accept the fact that it is significantly different. Fine, I can't repair that. Keep on with that 2+2=5 mentality. I've pretty much posted my view here, only other thing is that I believe this is a state issue, not a federal one, but that's been touched on too.
"I'm surrounded by idiots!" -- unknown
any 1 hear that that being gay is not evil by a school?
any 1 hear know why that would be wrong?
Telling kids they must accept homosexuality is wrong.... Putting ****ing "transgender" bathrooms in schools is wrong. Telling kids they can choose to be a boy or a girl is ****ing wrong. Using "1" instead of "one" is ****ing wrong.
If you cant use proper grammar don't address me.
ill address you any way
why is it wrong to not consider being homosexual wrong?
and since when do transgender people get a choice when it comes to the gender they identify themselves with?
That was "proven"? You sure have a loose definition of proven! Oh wait, then I "proved" that marriage is between a man and a woman.
who is telling kids to accept homosexuality and going beyond just telling them that they should not harass or mistreat people who are gay, and explaining away myths like you choose to be gay?
Since when are "transgender" people sane - let alone kids??
Why not let 10-year-olds vote, drink, smoke, join the military, drive, have sex etc???? Surely if they're emotionally mature enough to choose what gender they are they're mature enough to do other activities that require maturity.
How about this has nothing to do with homosexuality or transgender nonsense and everything to do with destroying cohesion in the United States? -- you know, how the totalitarians did it in China (Mao), Russia (Stalin/Lenin), Cambodia (Pol Pot), North Korea (Kim Jong-Il) etc.... You know how those sadistic killers achieved their desired "utopia"?? they destroyed culture, religion and the morals and ethics of their societies.....
No - social engineering (or brainwashing) by people like you. As in progressives forcing people (mostly children in public schools) to adhere to your progressive ideologies, in an attempt to manufacture future progressives.
Progressives don't allow people to form their own political ideologies - progressives teach people what their ideology should be.
You ever see 1984?
Well I think requiring schools by law (in sillyFornia) to allow kids to choose what bathroom they can use is making a ****ing statement. Furthermore progressives are promoting homosexuality as something "cool" and "hip."
your not telling my why its wrong to be gay? so why is it wrong to teach that its not wrong?
how's homosexuality or not identifying with your biological sex destroy morals....or culture....or religion?
and cohesion is exactly what the totalitarian want just their brand of it
im not sure the bathroom thing is a good idea
but who is promoting being gay as cool or hip you don't get to choose those things and the only people I ever hear saying otherwise are some not all but some conservatives I know progressives and some conservatives promote that you should not mistreat people for their sexuality
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?