It is not that grid scale batteries cannot play a role in reliable electricity, they can and do.If we've met before, you'll know I'm not often going to say the state Legislature did something right quickly. Austin got something right. Diversification.
I've seen many denials that batteries will work or be worth it. Anything from birds to subsidies was an excuse to make us seem helpless to change the global atmosphere. The claims ranged from solar panels in a hailstorm to cancer, from claiming no change is possible to the prevailing understanding is all wrong. The conclusion is that no green energy is a viable alternative or that no green energy is cost effective.
That's no longer a public policy delay. That's a partisan answer to a policy question. Texas is living it now , like Saturday.
View attachment 67583143
If you see the live page it will show a kink in the line about 8pm in most days in hot sunny weather. That gap was less than the amount being supplied by solar energy stored in batteries and wind at dusk. A week ago, renewables met 55% of demand.
Houston Chronicle, Sunday August 3
Chris Tomlinson
Record solar use keeping AC on
"Large scale batteries set a record by discharging 7,000 megawatts of power."
"They are the cheapest forms of new electricity, even without subsidies."
Subscription only
It is not that grid scale batteries cannot play a role in reliable electricity, they can and do.
What batteries cannot do, is fill the necessary role to allow non dispatchable solar power to be used
as dispatchable electricity.
Texas: A high stakes frontier for US battery energy storage systems
Short-duration BESS still dominate the fleet, but market signals like the Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service (DRRS) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) metrics are pushing developers toward longer-duration systems.
A good example is a modern data facility, they do everything they can to assure grid reliability, but
have both a battery UPS, and a motor generator. The UPS's batteries keep everything running until the motor generator
comes on. This is how batteries are used now on the grid, short duration stability.
That's not the problem at all. That itself is not the problem.To move Solar from a basically 10 hour supply to 24 hour coverage, is a whole different scale of energy storage.
To optimize the supply vs demand, we would really need seasonal energy storage, the ability to move
Spring and Fall Surpluses to Summer and Winter loads.
The most likely path to seasonal energy storge is something the left here strongly disagrees with,Yep.
That's not the problem at all. That itself is not the problem.
And we will, and it's good , and there's no reason to try stopping it.
And it's working quite well already, and it will only get better. There's no reason to oppose this.The most likely path to seasonal energy storge is something the left here strongly disagrees with,
and that is to follow how nature stores energy, hydrocarbons.
Batteries can store power for a few days, but tend to loose 1% per day, so would not be suitable for
a 90 day storage.
Solar has a real chance, Wind I think will be too costly in the long run, the signs are already there,And it's working quite well already, and it will only get better. There's no reason to oppose this.
Why would it be a problem current batteries only have a 90 day storage. Is that such a problem that we stop all green energy? Or should we barge forward? Should we surrender or go forward?
With an opening price guarantee of $0596 per kWh, increasing to $0.095 per kWh in year 20.The PPAs are with the Massachusetts distribution utilities of Eversource Energy, National Grid PLC and Unitil Corp. They set an energy price of $47.68/MWh for the first year, which would escalate to $76.22/MWh in the project's 20th year, according to state filings. And they set renewable energy credit prices at $11.92/REC for the first year, escalating to $19.06/REC in the 20th year.
Solar has a real chance, Wind I think will be too costly in the long run, the signs are already there,
people just don't want to admit it.
Avangrid asks to renegotiate contract prices for Mass. offshore wind project
Here is what Avangrid said was too low of a price.
With an opening price guarantee of $0596 per kWh, increasing to $0.095 per kWh in year 20.
Average wholesale prices are between 4 and 5 cents per kWh, and they are saying they cannot profitably
operate the wind farm at between 6 and 9.5 cents per kWh.
We are barging forward, but we should take a realistic approach, and leverage our resources.
The goal is sustainable energy, where everyone alive can live a first world lifestyle should they choose to.
Solar has a poor duty cycle, but grid scale energy storage can solve that, Wind in it's current form,
I think will be too costly to compete.
I think the plan is working, but the grid is balancing generation with demand.The state Legislature eventually adopted a plan of diversity. If anyone wants to know the weather in Longview, Texas they should skip the news and get the forecast from ercot. The plan is working. This is one case where the Republicans in Austin should let the private sector go.
When you said,
"we should take a realistic approach"
I don't think it's a "we", instead it's investors and private sector affairs. The public policy is about running the grid and less about generation. Since future demands will increase, green is already making up the difference. It's diversity. (Public policy also includes running off the roof top solar scammers too, but that's the AG)
As long as folks don't oppose it, I'm fine.
Do you think the state legislature is wrong about this?
I think the plan is working, but the grid is balancing generation with demand.
Non dispatchable sources like wind and to some extent Solar can disrupt the reliable supply.
Consider that the Winter 2021 outage was in a small part due to double dipping on our generation reserves.
We have peaking power plants that sit and wait to pick up excess load.
And it's working well now, today.Those same power plants are also used to supplement the poor duty cycle of wind and solar.
In 2021 ECROT had a condition where the excess load increased, at the same time as the supply from wind dropped.
That caused an avalanche effect as rolling brownouts took more and more peaking plants offline.
The initial failure was using the peaking supply as a backup supply.
And it is great that they work when they work, but non dispatchable sources of electricity cannotAnd yet it's working fine.
And yet solar and wind are working to contribute.
And it's working well now, today.
And solar and wind are contributing to the grid right now. And batteries are bridging the gap, to keep the AC on.
As long as folks don't oppose it, I'm fine.And it is great that they work when they work, but non dispatchable sources of electricity cannot
be depended on all the time. They are good for offsetting some of the load, at peak times, but
the balancing act is more complex. Yes it is working, but we still need better energy storage to move to the next step.
I do not think we are on different sides of the page.As long as folks don't oppose it, I'm fine.
And it's working quite well already, and it will only get better. There's no reason to oppose this.
Why would it be a problem current batteries only have a 90 day storage. Is that such a problem that we stop all green energy? Or should we barge forward? Should we surrender or go forward?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?