- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I believe she has read the whole Law like both sides report.....I think she has studied it in detail in order to write her book and be credible. Other than members of Congress she knows each and every detail. So I would say general speaking she would be.....despite not writing any of it.
So one side says she is an expert.....yet she knows what she is talking about and can cite which section of the law it is. While those such as yourself doubt the validity of the claim. Even knowing she knows the law better than most of them their selves.
So to say she isn't one.....there must be some sort of Information that disputes her claim to fame. Did you happen to find any yet?
How do you know she read the report, and how do you know that she is an expert on health care (aside from the fact that it says so in that one article)?