Well, before you start loading your trusty Colt Army Model 1860, consider that "freeloaders" are not really getting much of a deal. Sure, more people will be "insured" - many of them against their will, via the "individual mandate".
But it will not necessarily result in any real "wealth transfer" to them. (In the short term, it is obviously the opposite: many are forced to buy a product they don't want, or pay a fine).
The key issue - the growing costs of actual health care - is not being addressed; worse: this legislation effectively blocks he road to addressing it in the foreseeable future. Given unavoidable budget constraints, will the newly-covered "freeloader" get better care, as opposed to relying on Medicaid and emergency rooms, if we are talking about those who really "cannot afford it"? Highly unlikely.
There are three groups who are going to benefit from this travesty: (1) (selected) health "insurance" companies; (2) government bureaucracies, and (3) self-serving politicians (on both sides, mind you - mock indignation is just as profitable as the true-believer mask).
I am not saying that dependence on government is not corrupting. It most certainly is. But let's have some sense of reality here. The ACA was not a result of some vulgar popular uprising - it was a result of the left-of-the-center political elites striking a mutually profitable deal with a particular group within the "couldn't care less about left or right" corporate elites.
"Crony capitalism", that's the term. (Hi, Comrade Colonel Putin).
