1. Why open the door to the defense demanding in every evidentiary case that a special master be appointment?Its an odd thing where the prosecution thinks having a neutral party examine evidence central to the case is a bad thing.
he declassified all of them. It will be fun to see someone from the DOJ, CIA, or KGB state the process involved for a president to declassify documents.Define "Republican", and then tell us how Trump's values align with Republican values. Is stealing and holding, and lying about holding The American People's Top Secret documents at a private residence in the same area as love letters from the likes of Kim Jung UN now a "Republican" value?
Why do you imagine there are 50 STATES and we are not like Europe?50% of the country, supported Hillary. Actually Hillary WON the popular vote in 2016. Follow the example of her supporters and choose a person who is less controversial to try to win the next elections.
Amazing how some of these suffering from TDS make such declarative statements regarding the crimes supposedly committed by the FPOTUS.Oh, NOES! He moved documents he declassified around.
You don't determine that from a picture, you determine that from a catalog of documents. You don't guess, you make sure; the prosecution nor the plaintiff get the benefit of the doubt.
Oh, NOES! He moved documents he declassified around.
Trump got 70 million votes to Biden's 80 million votes, in the last election.You got 50% opf the country that supports Trump. How you gonna deal with that? Does the left really think
We may have that on 11-9
Why do you imagine there are 50 STATES and we are not like Europe?
We are gonna hear his response soon enough
Fox News turned on Trump. Fox is no longer the Fox News of yesteryear. I use them but also have numerous other conservative influencers and commentators that I have ready access to.
heh heh that is rich. Look who's the "On Topic Mod" now.Stay on topic, please. Your post has nothing to do with the OP.
Who cares?To me, it is a rag mag.
Because you don't give partiality to the prosecution or the plaintiff and asking the prosecution to sift through possible attorney client privilege papers shouldn't happen. Regardless of any claimed Executive privilege.1. Why open the door to the defense demanding in every evidentiary case that a special master be appointment?
2. There has been so much deceit in this matter on Trump's part that he shouldn't be unduly rewarded by winning a delay.
3. There is no evidence that the FBI is being less than impartial in this matter and can't adequately look over the documents.
Amazing how some of these suffering from TDS make such declarative statements regarding the crimes supposedly committed by the FPOTUS.
Like the Espionage Act, there is a reason this has never been applied to a POTUS.
An you have proof they are declassified? I call that fake news.Oh, NOES! He moved documents he declassified around.
The DoJ filing makes a compelling case that Trump's after-the-fact declassification was fiction, and deep down you know it.Oh, NOES! He moved documents he declassified around.
A sitting POTUS not a FPOTUS.Amazing how some of these suffering from TDS make such declarative statements regarding the crimes supposedly committed by the FPOTUS.
Like the Espionage Act, there is a reason this has never been applied to a POTUS.
What does this post have to do with this thread?It's cool. We are getting more representatives who don't keep the gloves off. They are the NEW Republicans who know your game of divide and conquer and ruining America through rampant spending, CRT training, wokeness, and green schemes that are just tax increases in disquise.
Because you don't give partiality to the prosecution or the plaintiff and asking the prosecution to sift through possible attorney client privilege papers shouldn't happen. Regardless of any claimed Executive privilege.
There is plenty of evidence that the FBI has been less than impartial in the past meaning its motives are suspect, especially in claiming documents damaging to the agency itself.
The last thing I heard from him was complaining the way the evidence against him was laid-out on the floor or some such.
Not a very substantive defense.
Because you don't give partiality to the prosecution or the plaintiff and asking the prosecution to sift through possible attorney client privilege papers shouldn't happen.
Re-read my post. You just repeated what I posted.The only privilege that could possibly apply here is attorney-client privilege.
Welp, that cinches it.
I get it. I do. But with a case like this, I would make sure every single thing has a redundancy built in.And yet, it does happen - every single day. That's how the system works.
Re-read my post. You just repeated what I posted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?