• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rachel Maddow uses shameless lie to trash Republicans

On Monday Oct 18 Rachel Maddow misstated the time Congressman Stockman received the fax, but the time he received it was never her point. Her point was that the congressman was so extreme that he received the fax from a militia member. There was an attempt in this thread to show the fax was sent 'hundreds' of congressmen, but it's simply not credible. If it was credible, then there must be an FBI file on them as well. In fact in the Chicago Tribune story that was researched by Newsbusters Stockman says the fax was sent by a Michigan woman named Libby Malloy.

But for the FBI he writes: "On the day of the Oklahoma City bombing someone sent our office an anonymous fax which appeared to relate to that tragedy."
Incorrect... go back and read, and you'll see the words 'hundreds of people'. At least get the posts right, if you can't get anything else right.
 
"Hard leftist" is a baseless opinion of yours.
Only if you too are a hard leftist. Baseless? You're kidding right?

Wiki said:
Media Matters describes itself as "a web-based, not-for-profit, progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media."

Media Matters entire existance is to undermine Conservatives and spin for Progressives -- e.g., "hard leftists". Why you yourself post articles from Media Matters.

Wiki said:
The December 1, 2003, USA Today quoted Soros's worth at "about $7 billion," of which Soros had pledged "$15.5 million to anti-Bush, anti-conservative groups ... giving $10 million to Americans Coming Together, $2.5 million to MoveOn.org, and $3 million to the Center for American Progress." Soros was then in the process of "writing his own anti-Bush book. The Bubble of American Supremacy, a critique of the president's foreign policy," which hit bookstores in January 2004. [5]

The Open Society Network - also started by Soros draws a lot of linkages to "hard left" organization while laughingly calling itself "non-partisan". All hard leftist organizations seem to want to advertise they're non-partisan. Hmm. Saying Media Matters isn't a hard leftist group is like claiming Manson is a harmless misunderstood patsy.

And until recently hasn't received direct funds from George Soros. The reason he is giving them funds now is because of the violent rhetoric of him and the Tides Foundation from Glenn Beck.
Yes. "direct funds" being the key words there.

So, what Jack wrote about Media Matters is Bull****, devoid of any facts.

I provided facts to you. And as of October 10th of this year, Media Matters is exactly a "propaganda machine for George Soros and the looney left." Just like the Daily Kos, just like Moveon.org, etc. Soros uses his money to push his agenda which is to spread far and wide progressive socialist nonsense. I can't say your denial is even remotely amusing --- because it's repeated millions of times by the robots who follow progressive ideology. Just follow the money with Soros. It's not too difficult.
 
I provided facts to you. And as of October 10th of this year, Media Matters is exactly a "propaganda machine for George Soros and the looney left." Just like the Daily Kos, just like Moveon.org, etc. Soros uses his money to push his agenda which is to spread far and wide progressive socialist nonsense. I can't say your denial is even remotely amusing --- because it's repeated millions of times by the robots who follow progressive ideology. Just follow the money with Soros. It's not too difficult.
What you provided is your opinion, not much more. If you want to know where the propaganda is coming from, you need to look no further than the Fox News Channel and thousands of hours of what commonly called conservative talk radio. That's where the propaganda goes on none stop, they would make Joseph Goebbels proud, in fact they come from the same end of the policical spectrum as he did.
 
What you provided is your opinion, not much more. If you want to know where the propaganda is coming from, you need to look no further than the Fox News Channel and thousands of hours of what commonly called conservative talk radio. That's where the propaganda goes on none stop, they would make Joseph Goebbels proud, in fact they come from the same end of the policical spectrum as he did.

So you're answer is "LALALALA - CAN'T HEAR YOU". Yep - that's about right.
 
So you're answer is "LALALALA - CAN'T HEAR YOU". Yep - that's about right.

Your post was bull****, which is about right when you have no facts.
 
Your post was bull****, which is about right when you have no facts.

So refute it with "facts" then. All I see is you making claims... no facts.
 
So refute it with "facts" then. All I see is you making claims... no facts.
It's you who claim that I'm a "hard leftist." You must first define what that means, then show how I am one, then show why that is bad in your opinion. The burden of proof is on you, but be careful you don't want to be in DP jail. ;)
 
Why is it that she had to apologize in the most jackass way imaginable? How is it an acceptable apology when you fling crap at the people that caught you in the mistake? Is this grade school where any kind of apology is accepted and put on equal footing? Its a shameful excuse at an apology that loses any meaning with the mindless insults she decided to add at the end. With this kind of behavior she just shows to the world she is a childish, immature brat that has some serious growing up to do. There is little doubt all she served to do was make herself open to having to issue a apology for the apology. She needs to seriously consider what is acceptable behavior in the public eye.
 
What you provided is your opinion, not much more. If you want to know where the propaganda is coming from, you need to look no further than the Fox News Channel and thousands of hours of what commonly called conservative talk radio. That's where the propaganda goes on none stop, they would make Joseph Goebbels proud, in fact they come from the same end of the policical spectrum as he did.

Wow... a mention of a Nazi and conservatives in the same breath. Who would have thought we'd ever see something like that from a liberal :ninja:
 
It's you who claim that I'm a "hard leftist."
I believe I said "Only if you too are a hard leftist." I never actually claimed you were one, but if you want to embrace it, have at it.

You must first define what that means, then show how I am one, then show why that is bad in your opinion. The burden of proof is on you, but be careful you don't want to be in DP jail. ;)
I don't need to define it, Google is your friend, use it. What you are is irrelevant, and I could actually care less. The point was't to define you, which isn't remotely interesting, the point was to identify Soros and Media Matters and Moveon.org as progressive funded shill machines. Which I've done. You then try to make this all about you... which bores me. If you want to discuss yourself... start a new thread and post to yourself about it.
 
I believe I said "Only if you too are a hard leftist." I never actually claimed you were one, but if you want to embrace it, have at it.

I don't need to define it, Google is your friend, use it. What you are is irrelevant, and I could actually care less. The point was't to define you, which isn't remotely interesting, the point was to identify Soros and Media Matters and Moveon.org as progressive funded shill machines. Which I've done. You then try to make this all about you... which bores me. If you want to discuss yourself... start a new thread and post to yourself about it.

It seems to me that anyone who sees those entities as "hard left" is actually "hard right" What do you think about a Rand Paul thug beating a MoveOn.org supporter and giving her a concussion and sending her to the hosiptal?
 
I am not sure what happen there, but you should read the comments on YouTube.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwZ5X0JMd3Q&feature=player_embedded&has_verified=1

The guy who got punched is my neighbor. And he is an asshole he deserved the punch believe me.


To be honest, that white cracker swung first but missed, so he deserved that knuckle sandwich on the side of his face. I hope he lost a couple of molars, too
 
It seems to me that anyone who sees those entities as "hard left" is actually "hard right" What do you think about a Rand Paul thug beating a MoveOn.org supporter and giving her a concussion and sending her to the hosiptal?

Whic incident are you referring to> The one with the lady on the ground who got stomped on?
 
Now THERE'S a man I'd want to defend on a political message board :ninja:

Sure, it's only racist when a non minority makes a comment like that. When it's a minority using racist language and then using violence it's all okay. The problem is, there's no video evidence "that white cracker" did any swinging. I'm a little, a smidge, skeptical the "white cracker" did anything wrong. The only thing on the video I see is him tell the guy to stay away from his wife. I'll let the courts sort it out. :lamo
 
Back
Top Bottom