Crusader13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2019
- Messages
- 893
- Reaction score
- 212
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
The constitutional right to free speech comes with limitations. You can't give false testimony, shout fire in a crowded theatre, or call for violence.
Your right to live comes with limitations too. If you start to become a major threat to society or harm others, your life will be ended.
Your right to bear arms comes with limitations too. As soon as other people are in reasonable danger you can and will be forced to give up your guns in some places.
Like I said, every right we have comes with limitations. Nothing is unconditional. A right needs to be earned by taking on the responsibility of using it correctly. In the same way, women can choose what happens to their body, but once another life is being detrimented that right is restricted just like every other. Your rights end where someone's else's begin.
And removing a kidney is not akin to ending a human life. Frankly, if the government introduced legislations to force healthy and able people into giving blood or donating organs the outrage would be marginal. As long as you could forego it if there was a reasonable risk or you had a serious fear of needles I'm sure most people wouldn't mind being coerced into saving a life. Those that would be complaining most would likely be women again. The most over entitled group in history.
Your right to live comes with limitations too. If you start to become a major threat to society or harm others, your life will be ended.
Your right to bear arms comes with limitations too. As soon as other people are in reasonable danger you can and will be forced to give up your guns in some places.
Like I said, every right we have comes with limitations. Nothing is unconditional. A right needs to be earned by taking on the responsibility of using it correctly. In the same way, women can choose what happens to their body, but once another life is being detrimented that right is restricted just like every other. Your rights end where someone's else's begin.
And removing a kidney is not akin to ending a human life. Frankly, if the government introduced legislations to force healthy and able people into giving blood or donating organs the outrage would be marginal. As long as you could forego it if there was a reasonable risk or you had a serious fear of needles I'm sure most people wouldn't mind being coerced into saving a life. Those that would be complaining most would likely be women again. The most over entitled group in history.
Last edited: