Life has in it it's own intelligence. It needs no brain in order to survive, ask any scientist how smart AIDS and disease are, they are losing the battle. Our life intelligence is far from wisdom.
Animals are sinless, they do not see the difference in life intelligence and wisdom, as we lash out at what makes cancer work so well, to take away our children, we eat veal. If a cow had wisdom would she see us as like cancer, living means life will end. What gives me as a human with the same intelligence of life the right to judge other life for using them?
That I even exist is because of that same intelligence inside me, it made humans more succesfull than any other life today, how can it be wrong? We see that it is because unlike animals we have intelligence beyond just survive, we have wisdom too.
Morals do not apply to life intelligence, the T-Rex had none, cats have none, we as humans have the ability to not live indifferent, we can see the suffering and try to stop it.
"God" did not make morals, yet we have the ability to define them for ourselves. It is up to us by free will, to decide what is and is not "moral." Does "God" tell us of a good way to act for the benifit of all? Yes. Do some take this view and us it for their own good? Yes.
Moral's are only for humans to judge each other and our actions by, not for "God" to hold us to as a requirement for life. Those life rules are all based in unmoral actions, we can chose not to participate in that way of living, animalish. Morals do that by our own measure.
You are right "God" does not have to be moral, life will go on, innocent and blissfull in the killing and survival mode alone absent of any morals. Morals are not necessary to life, they are a better way to live. Our morals are a way our own wisdom recommends we live, yet requires to acheive it the intelligence of life..
KMS