- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
- Messages
- 19,815
- Reaction score
- 14,842
- Location
- PNW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Two things we know about Putin's mentality: one, if he blames the enemy of doing it, it is what he plans to do himself; and two, he cannot "lose". When he is failing, he lashes out indiscriminately. He is quite the typical abuser, actually; a narcissistic sociopath.
What has me concerned is that early in the war (March 5), the Russian propaganda arm was actively promoting the idea that Ukraine would use a dirty bomb. Russia, without evidence, says Ukraine making nuclear "dirty bomb" (Reuters). It's an idiotic claim, frankly, as Ukrainians are fighting in their own territory. Moreover, this was right after Russian forces had taken over Chernobyl and immediately prior to the attack on Zaporizhzhia. Russia's seizure of nuclear power plant raises international concerns (NPR).
At the time I thought it was a cover for an attack on a Ukrainian nuclear facility (it hadn't happened yet), in case there was a meltdown. Now, however, I think it is more sinister.
Having lost the initiative, and even being pushed back by Ukrainian forces, I think Putin's fallback is to destroy as much of Ukraine as possible, then withdraw what's left of his army. But, with EU unity, and pledges to rebuild a la the Marshall plan, Ukraine might bounce back too quickly, and more unified.
So, I think his plan, now, is to "salt the earth" in Ukraine. He has the ability to make a long range attack, and what better way to make the territory uninhabitable than radiation, like Chernobyl? The fissile material is in his control, it has the signature of Ukrainian sources, and he can blame it on an "accident" or Ukrainian sabotage, and with a seat on the Security Council, he can block any investigation, condemnation or prosecution. It's devious enough for a crazed KGB operative who's never gotten over losing the cold war, and whose hatred of "the west" is pathological.
I woke up sweating this morning thinking about it.
What has me concerned is that early in the war (March 5), the Russian propaganda arm was actively promoting the idea that Ukraine would use a dirty bomb. Russia, without evidence, says Ukraine making nuclear "dirty bomb" (Reuters). It's an idiotic claim, frankly, as Ukrainians are fighting in their own territory. Moreover, this was right after Russian forces had taken over Chernobyl and immediately prior to the attack on Zaporizhzhia. Russia's seizure of nuclear power plant raises international concerns (NPR).
At the time I thought it was a cover for an attack on a Ukrainian nuclear facility (it hadn't happened yet), in case there was a meltdown. Now, however, I think it is more sinister.
Having lost the initiative, and even being pushed back by Ukrainian forces, I think Putin's fallback is to destroy as much of Ukraine as possible, then withdraw what's left of his army. But, with EU unity, and pledges to rebuild a la the Marshall plan, Ukraine might bounce back too quickly, and more unified.
So, I think his plan, now, is to "salt the earth" in Ukraine. He has the ability to make a long range attack, and what better way to make the territory uninhabitable than radiation, like Chernobyl? The fissile material is in his control, it has the signature of Ukrainian sources, and he can blame it on an "accident" or Ukrainian sabotage, and with a seat on the Security Council, he can block any investigation, condemnation or prosecution. It's devious enough for a crazed KGB operative who's never gotten over losing the cold war, and whose hatred of "the west" is pathological.
I woke up sweating this morning thinking about it.