• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Putin’s dictatorship is now based on FEAR rather than spin

watsup

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2020
Messages
34,475
Reaction score
14,659
Location
Springfield MO
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal

The origins of the war in Ukraine lie in Russian economic stagnation, corruption and the president’s dwindling popularity​

Good article on how Putin used Crimea and is using Ukraine as a dog and pony show to try to bolster his increasing unpopularity due to economic problems, and his need for increased repression against his own citizens.

“The fact that Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine at huge economic cost to Russia does not mean the economy does not matter to him. On the contrary, economic performance — or, rather, underperformance — played a key role in his decision. As he could no longer deliver income growth, or at least convince Russians the economy is doing better than it could otherwise, he tried to replay the 2014 Crimea scenario. This might have worked, but he miscalculated.

Putin’s aggression has brought material devastation and human tragedy to Ukrainians. But the war has also destroyed Russia’s economy. In 2022, the country’s gross domestic product will shrink by at least 11 per cent — the worst recession since the early 1990s.

However, as Putin’s centralisation of power promoted corruption and stifled competition, his economic model lost steam. After the recovery from the global financial crisis, Russian GDP growth slowed almost to zero. As incomes stopped growing, Putin’s popularity declined substantially as well. According to the independent Levada Center, Putin’s approval rating fell from a peak of 88 per cent in September 2008 to the low 60s in late 2013.

Putin’s corrupt model protected his proxies at the expense of ordinary Russians. In 2019, Russian GDP was 6 per cent above its pre-Crimea level, but real incomes of Russian households were 7 per cent below their 2013 peak.

Putin tried to convince Russians that their stagnating living standards were better than any potential alternative. However, this narrative was increasingly hard to spin as younger Russians evaded propaganda and circumvented censorship through social media. By April 2020, Putin’s approval fell to a historically low 59 per cent.

Running out of options, Putin returned to his 2014 recipe — hoping that a short victorious war would once again raise his popularity despite the lack of economic success. This time, however, he gravely miscalculated. He overestimated his military strength, under-appreciated Ukrainians’ courage and will to defend their country, and did not expect the unity and resolve of the western response. Dictators are prone to making such mistakes, especially those who, like Putin, eliminate critics, suppress independent media and stifle debate in and outside the system.

The consequences of Putin’s aggression are catastrophic for Russia’s economy and deadly for Russian politics. Before the war, he was a spin dictator, pretending to be a democrat and relying on money and manipulation of information. Once he saw that 2022 is not 2014, he moved to Przeworski’s third pillar: fear. A week after the war started, he closed down the few remaining independent media and introduced wartime censorship.

Borrowing from Adolf Hitler, he now refers to antiwar protesters as “national traitors” and threatens to “spit them out like a fly”. Putin’s regime has completed its reversion from a 21st-century spin dictatorship to a 20th-century dictatorship based on fear. Unfortunately, this is what Russia will look like until he is gone.”

 
For a dictator, he certainly does not cut a very prepossessing figure.

He's almost a clownish little man.

There's none of Mussolini's swagger.
None of Hitler's oratorical prowess (which seems comical today).
None of Mao's charisma (who enjoyed delicious food and female companionship while millions were starving to death).

You have to give the little runt credit: He has stayed in power for two decades by playing off the robber barons against each other.

I can only hope that he has nightmares about being overthrown (like that Romanian dictator back in the 1980s who finally got his comeuppance).
 

The origins of the war in Ukraine lie in Russian economic stagnation, corruption and the president’s dwindling popularity​

Good article on how Putin used Crimea and is using Ukraine as a dog and pony show to try to bolster his increasing unpopularity due to economic problems, and his need for increased repression against his own citizens.

“The fact that Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine at huge economic cost to Russia does not mean the economy does not matter to him. On the contrary, economic performance — or, rather, underperformance — played a key role in his decision. As he could no longer deliver income growth, or at least convince Russians the economy is doing better than it could otherwise, he tried to replay the 2014 Crimea scenario. This might have worked, but he miscalculated.

Putin’s aggression has brought material devastation and human tragedy to Ukrainians. But the war has also destroyed Russia’s economy. In 2022, the country’s gross domestic product will shrink by at least 11 per cent — the worst recession since the early 1990s.

However, as Putin’s centralisation of power promoted corruption and stifled competition, his economic model lost steam. After the recovery from the global financial crisis, Russian GDP growth slowed almost to zero. As incomes stopped growing, Putin’s popularity declined substantially as well. According to the independent Levada Center, Putin’s approval rating fell from a peak of 88 per cent in September 2008 to the low 60s in late 2013.

Putin’s corrupt model protected his proxies at the expense of ordinary Russians. In 2019, Russian GDP was 6 per cent above its pre-Crimea level, but real incomes of Russian households were 7 per cent below their 2013 peak.

Putin tried to convince Russians that their stagnating living standards were better than any potential alternative. However, this narrative was increasingly hard to spin as younger Russians evaded propaganda and circumvented censorship through social media. By April 2020, Putin’s approval fell to a historically low 59 per cent.

Running out of options, Putin returned to his 2014 recipe — hoping that a short victorious war would once again raise his popularity despite the lack of economic success. This time, however, he gravely miscalculated. He overestimated his military strength, under-appreciated Ukrainians’ courage and will to defend their country, and did not expect the unity and resolve of the western response. Dictators are prone to making such mistakes, especially those who, like Putin, eliminate critics, suppress independent media and stifle debate in and outside the system.

The consequences of Putin’s aggression are catastrophic for Russia’s economy and deadly for Russian politics. Before the war, he was a spin dictator, pretending to be a democrat and relying on money and manipulation of information. Once he saw that 2022 is not 2014, he moved to Przeworski’s third pillar: fear. A week after the war started, he closed down the few remaining independent media and introduced wartime censorship.

Borrowing from Adolf Hitler, he now refers to antiwar protesters as “national traitors” and threatens to “spit them out like a fly”. Putin’s regime has completed its reversion from a 21st-century spin dictatorship to a 20th-century dictatorship based on fear. Unfortunately, this is what Russia will look like until he is gone.”


The guy is more popular than ever. Maybe get a new source?
 
You clearly didn’t read the article. As such. I’m not going to respond to your misstatements.

I have a news feed. Why on earth would I read an article you post?

This is a message board. Your post YOUR thoughts not links to others.
You only offer links to support your contention.

Why must I give lessons in message board 101?
 
Ruling with fear has ALWAYS been a policy of Russia's leadership.
 
I have a news feed. Why on earth would I read an article you post?

This is a message board. Your post YOUR thoughts not links to others.
You only offer links to support your contention.

Why must I give lessons in message board 101?

This thread is about the article that I posted. If you refuse to read the article so that you can then make an accurate comment, then why comment at all? Do you know how debate works?
 
Back
Top Bottom