• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Protestors SWARM Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's Home After Bombshell Documentary About Sexual Assault

Rawley

Sedition Apologist™ and Charter Cult Member™
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Messages
23,785
Reaction score
7,580
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
I absolutely agree with that. There is a time and place for everything, and at night in front of a house is not the place to protest.
Particularly one where there has already been an assassination attempt on the home owner.
 

zincwarrior

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
840
Reaction score
506
Location
Central Texas

DrewPaul

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Messages
1,363
Reaction score
262
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
He was the victim of a left wing smear campaign. But he got the last laugh. He's probably working out every day so he can live as long as possible.
 

Credence

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
6,347
Reaction score
6,925
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Independent
It was not the first time Kavanaugh's residence has been swarmed by protestors.


someday a person will get hurt, I hope it's an illegal protest, they should be arrested and charged.
As long as the protestors are peaceful I don't see the harm. Having said that, I honestly do not think protestors should protest at or around someone's home.
 

Fishking

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Messages
39,982
Reaction score
14,994
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
I wish they did a better job investigating all that at the time.
To me it seemed like a rushed job.
Either way, there where holes in her story big enough to drive a Zamboni through. She absolutely stayed away from giving a single specific detail that would give Kavanaugh a chance at proving his innocence. House/location? Nope. A time? Nope. Friend that was claimed to be a witness? She said it didn't happen.
 

BirdinHand

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
11,465
Reaction score
11,658
Location
New Jersey
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
Video work?


Wow…really causing a big ruckus. 🙄

Did I miss the “swarm” like the title states? The video didn’t show that.

They’re walking down a sidewalk chanting and carrying signs.

First Amendment.
 

eohrnberger

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
55,896
Reaction score
38,713
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
It was not the first time Kavanaugh's residence has been swarmed by protestors.


someday a person will get hurt, I hope it's an illegal protest, they should be arrested and charged.
This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...​
  • Uscode - 18 USC 1502​


    Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...​

Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.
 

Galactic Spin

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 17, 2022
Messages
12,675
Reaction score
8,301
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...​
  • Uscode - 18 USC 1502​


    Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...​

Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.
This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...​
  • Uscode - 18 USC 1502​


    Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...​

Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.
Why do you righties get that law wrong every single time? It's like you can't read.
 

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
111,031
Reaction score
56,919
Location
Bradenton Fla
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...​
  • Uscode - 18 USC 1502​


    Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...​

Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.
PROTIP: When copy/pasting, it is a good idea to actually read what you are copy/pasting, otherwise, like this time, you will look ****ing idiotic. In now way, under no interpretation of the law, in any rational mind, is anyone doing anything remotely like what is described in those laws.
 

BlueTex

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
40,047
Reaction score
30,206
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
He was the victim of a left wing smear campaign. But he got the last laugh. He's probably working out every day so he can live as long as possible.

The history textbooks get the last laugh...
 

BlueTex

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Messages
40,047
Reaction score
30,206
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
This is exactly like how the left wants to have it. SCOTUS justices intimidated execute their duties, to render their rulings on the principal of law.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing ma...​
  • Uscode - 18 USC 1502​


    Historical and Revision Notes. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 661 (R.S. 5277). Said section 661 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 752 of this title.. Words "an extradition agent of the United States" were substituted for "such agent" which was referred to in sections 3182 et seq. of this title.. A fine of "$300" was substituted for ...

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by...​

Never mind how federally illegal it is, this how the left wants it.
And yet, it is the left the audacity to constantly accuse others of being Fascist.
Go figure. So absolutely clueless they are.


LMAO... Federally illegal? 18 USC 1507 is unconstitutional and any prosecutions would get thrown out....
 

Callen

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Messages
21,242
Reaction score
22,110
Location
Canada
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
I am opposed to protesting in front of anyone's home. It is unfair to their family and their neighbours but unless the law prohibits it then the good ole first kicks in.
 

eohrnberger

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
55,896
Reaction score
38,713
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
PROTIP: When copy/pasting, it is a good idea to actually read what you are copy/pasting, otherwise, like this time, you will look ****ing idiotic. In now way, under no interpretation of the law, in any rational mind, is anyone doing anything remotely like what is described in those laws.
A rather indefensible position that you assert that the protestors around conservative SCOTUS residences weren't 'Influencing or injuring' or that it wasn't 'picketing or parading' the justices.

Doesn't that contradict already the well established facts of the matter?
 

Hatuey

Rule of Two
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Messages
58,532
Reaction score
25,856
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
He's not a rapist, so there is that.

All your posts after this are just incel level rape enablement. Of course they would come from our resident religious indoctrinator.

😁
 

Redress

Liberal Fascist For Life!
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
111,031
Reaction score
56,919
Location
Bradenton Fla
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
A rather indefensible position that you assert that the protestors around conservative SCOTUS residences weren't 'Influencing or injuring' or that it wasn't 'picketing or parading' the justices.

Doesn't that contradict already the well established facts of the matter?
Do you think he was pressured to change his vote by protesters who where protesting his actions some years ago?

You use this word, "facts", but I donot think you know what it means.
 

mrjurrs

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 22, 2019
Messages
25,149
Reaction score
12,436
Location
The Bay
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Because he hasn't been proven to be. Add in that Ford is their star accuser and she was demonstrated to be full of shit, so there is that.
Proof is not required outside a court of law. Circumstantial evidence is sufficient for informed opinions.

"Christine Blasey Ford, the California psychologist who told a Senate committee Thursday that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her decades ago when they were both teenagers, appeared credible as she recounted her harrowing ordeal, legal specialists said. "The #MeToo movement is terribly compelling, but I’m not someone who thinks every accusation is true,” said Nancy Gertner, a retired federal judge who teaches at Harvard Law. “I also don’t believe every accusation is false. So I could not say from [prior] press accounts, ‘oh, I believe it.’ But after today, I can say that.”

Gertner cited several factors that she said bolstered Ford’s credibility, including her consistency about the gaps in her memory of the alleged assault dating back to the 1980s."

Got a source for your claim?
 

Manc Skipper

Wrinkly member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2008
Messages
38,840
Reaction score
27,942
Location
Southern England
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
What exactly is involved in "swarming" a building? It's a very loaded word to use. Is it like ants swarming into a nest, like the Capitol attack?
 

j brown's body

CHRISTIAN-ish
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
36,252
Reaction score
28,524
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Because he hasn't been proven to be. Add in that Ford is their star accuser and she was demonstrated to be full of shit, so there is that.

If that were true, the GOP would not gave hijacked the Ford hearings they called that woman in to perform.
 
Top Bottom