• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Prosser gains 7,500 votes in Waukesha County

She is a republican. Th e head of the democrat party in the county also reviewed the numbers and is agreeing with her that it was an error that the 14,000 votes were not included in the totals.

look, i'm still gonna say this is suspicious as hell. so the general numbers add up - that doesn't mean there was no fraud. I know my district swings heavily for my candidate of choice, i wait for a day or so after the election to see if it needs to swing just a biiiit heavier - but still within the margin of not being obviously fradulent.
 
Seriously, people are apparently advocating we run our elections similar to the ****ing Hall of Fame for Baseball and Football?

Am I in bizarro world?

In no way should a press organization have power over the electoral process of this country.
 

The exact results were provided to a Huffington/AOL run newspaper on election night. So, we know for certain that what you suggest did not actually happen.

 

Wasn't fraudulent to begin with. Prosser is still judge.
 
Look at this post folks. Full hate, anger and silliness.

Here's a newsflash Pete, humans make mistakes.

Here's a newsflash for you - weren't Reps/con's panties all in a knot when they had to do a recount on Franken and it turned out he actually had more votes?

There was a lot of hate anger and silliness over it - actually, some are still pissed over it, must be the human element, no?
 
Translation - I never provided a link to a reputable source, because I don't have one, so now I am lying about it.

The link was provided.

The source is reputable by all honest uses of the word. Your claim that the Wall Street Journal is not reputable makes a mockery of your position. That you have to pretend the reality didn't happen speaks deeply of your emotional attachment to ideology at the expense of honesty and truth.
 


But he actually had more fake votes, and that's the whole issue there. You see, in honest elections the candidate isn't allowed to create more votes than there are voters in a district, and he's not allowed to pull ballots out of his trunk.

The Mayor is aware that you're a "Moderate" and hence incapable of seeing the corruption in the Democrat party, but since it does exist the Mayor isn't going to pretend its not there.
 

You claim the Wall Street Journal has evidence that the Minnesota election was a fraud, yet you did not post the link, and claim that you did. This is downright dishonest.
 
You claim the Wall Street Journal has evidence that the Minnesota election was a fraud, yet you did not post the link, and claim that you did. This is downright dishonest.

Read the friggin' thread before you make assinine claims.
 
Read the friggin' thread before you make assinine claims.

I did. You posted NO evidence whatsoever. The piece that you posted, that came from the Wall Street Journal, was an OPINION piece, and NOT evidence. By the way, do YOU know who the author of this OPINION piece was?

To everybody at Debate Politics - You be the judge. Is this proof?

Here are the facts - Tim Pawlenty certified the election.

Now I will ask you once again to post PROOF, not some opinion piece from myguylostsoiamwhiningaboutit.com. I am calling you out again. PROVE IT!! I also stand by my statement that you did not post any PROOF from a reputable source. All you posted was an opinion from some guy. And opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one. If you really believe that you posted proof, then I can post all kinds of opinions about aliens from outer space giving anal probes to everybody, and other such junk, and foist that off on people as proof too.

Finally, Tim Pawlenty certified the election. Did I already say that? Yup, but I had to say it again because you just don't get it.
 
Last edited:

I see RH is a Reagan admirer. :lamo
 

You really missed the point.

We pretty much have already turned over much of the election process to private companies.
 
how can there be 188 replies and no one has said, how the hell do you lose 7000 votes. Sounds like a liberal steal gone bad. Somebody got caught.
you dont LOSE 7000 votes.
Im hoping they found them in someones trunk like they used to put Al Franken in
 
If you had read, you would know they were never lost
 

Damn, did this one ever fly over your head. This had nothing to do with Liberals attempting to steal an election. A CONSERVATIVE worker misplaced the votes, and by doing so, lost votes that would have gone to her own candidate. It was all a dumb mistake by a dumb worker, who should be fired. Having said that, the votes were nevertheless recovered, and Prosser wins the election fair and square. Now you can whine about Liberals attempting to steal votes, and Liberals can whine that Prosser's campaign worker stole the election, and none of the whining on either side amounts to more than a hill of beans. This election has been verified, and the best candidate won. I don't like the fact that Prosser is going to rubber stamp Walker's plan to destroy public unions in Wisconsin, but I am in Texas, and the voters of Wisconsin made their choice at the polls. And that, folks, whining by both sides notwithstanding, is how democracy works.
 
But he actually had more fake votes, and that's the whole issue there. You see, in honest elections the candidate isn't allowed to create more votes than there are voters in a district, and he's not allowed to pull ballots out of his trunk.

What a bunch of hogwash! In honest elections, you recount the votes and you don't let some Secretary of State to make a decision and give electoral votes to a candidate that has less popular votes, then cause the whole election to go forward to a right-leaning SCOTUS! If Franken had fake votes as the loonies claim, I'm sure Taitz would have already filed a lawsuit - hmmm, maybe she did and they threw it out for its ridiculousness?

The Mayor is aware that you're a "Moderate" and hence incapable of seeing the corruption in the Democrat party, but since it does exist the Mayor isn't going to pretend its not there.

Matthew 7:5
You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
 
Last edited:
Oh wow. A news agency owned by Rupert Murdoch printed an opinion piece claiming a Democrat committed fraud. It must be a day whose name ends in "day" today.
 
This just in:

Canvass Shows Conservative Incumbent Wins Wisconsin Supreme Court Race
Canvass Shows Conservative Incumbent Wins Wisconsin Supreme Court Race - FoxNews.com
 
Wisconsin Election Officials to Verify Prosser as Victor in Court Race Recount - FoxNews.com


 
Wow, this is terrible news. Perhaps an entire Democratic town was also missed last night...

Wow, I didn't realize that towns were broken out by being Democrat or Republican.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…