• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Prosecutor Says Bush Appointees Interfered With Tobacco Case

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,257
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Obstruction of justice? You betcha. Administration officials ordered a prosecutor to tell 2 witnesses to change their testimony. The upcoming investigations should not be limited to the firings and perjury which was committed, but should be expanded to include the obstruction of justice, which was done purposely to weaken the government's case against the tobacco companies.

McCallum, the man behind the orders, and who is now the Ambassador to Australia, claims that there was no politicization of the case, and cites the fact that he was cleared by the Office of Professional Responsibility, which consists of Bush appointees (go figure).

Something is rotten in Denmark, and it ain't the fish.

Article is here.
 
Obstruction of justice? You betcha. Administration officials ordered a prosecutor to tell 2 witnesses to change their testimony. The upcoming investigations should not be limited to the firings and perjury which was committed, but should be expanded to include the obstruction of justice, which was done purposely to weaken the government's case against the tobacco companies.

McCallum, the man behind the orders, and who is now the Ambassador to Australia, claims that there was no politicization of the case, and cites the fact that he was cleared by the Office of Professional Responsibility, which consists of Bush appointees (go figure).

Something is rotten in Denmark, and it ain't the fish.

Article is here.

I read this article yesterday on the front page and was disgusted. In today's paper, it indicates that Waxman is planning on investigating this case. The prosecutor was given a closing argument and told to read it. She indicated she was unable to look at the judge when she read it (but why she went along with it is beyond me). I would have stood up to them--but that's me.

From today's paper:

washingtonpost.com

Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said in a letter to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales that he would look into a report in yesterday's Washington Post that top Bush appointees interfered with and weakened the government's racketeering case against tobacco companies in 2005.
 
Back
Top Bottom