Obama's statement from your article:This article contains the biased and propagandistic, inciting distortions of the events of the Duante Wright Shooting and death.
The inflammatory comments quoted in this article from Obama and Biden are a disgusting example of inciting mobs to violence.
Really disgusting quotes from the ideologues, really disgusting distortions and omissions by the writer and really disgusting lack of editorial integrity by the biased propagandists running the show at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinal.
OnPolitics: Two grieving communities
The Obamas speak out on the killing of an unarmed Black man by the police.www.jsonline.com
How is this inciting mobs to violence exactly?"Our hearts are heavy over yet another shooting of a Black man, Daunte Wright, at the hands of police," the couple wrote in a joint statement. "It’s important to conduct a full and transparent investigation, but this is also a reminder of just how badly we need to reimagine policing and public safety in this country,"
Obama's statement from your article:
How is this inciting mobs to violence exactly?
It says quite clearly that the police are at fault and that it was negligence and stupidity that caused the tragedy.
"Our hearts are heavy over yet another shooting of a Black man, Daunte Wright, at the hands of police," the couple wrote in a joint statement. "It’s important to conduct a full and transparent investigation, but this is also a reminder of just how badly we need to reimagine policing and public safety in this country,"
The fact that the police knew they were dealing with a man who attempted an armed robbery along with a gun charge was resisting arrest and getting into his car. There could have been a gun inside.
Let's try again. Where in the following statement do the Obamas incite violent mobs?
The police don't get to shoot someone because there 'could have been' a gun.
Where in the statement does he incite mobs to violence?The entire statement is one of bias against the police. This is an example of avoiding the chance to do some good by just saying nothing.
Nice strawmen.Are you suggesting that the police must be shot BEFORE they can return fire and then it's okay? Is there EVER a reason that justifies the use of force?
Should all police officers be jailed on every occasion that any sort of force is employed?
When is it that you are going to claim to be mr. neutral again?The entire Obama statement is one of bias against the police. This is an example of avoiding the chance to do some good by just doing nothing. This is the general character of every statement Obama ever makes regarding police.
They aimed the blame directly at the police. A tragedy occurred. The TRAGEDY is the target. They missed because they were shooting at the police. Divisive, hate filled and inciting.
In this particular case, the police say, and this is shown by what the body cam recorded, that the SHOOTING was both an accident and a mistake. Obama making a statement when he knew NOTHING was just wrong.
In this case, the police were trying to control a person that was resisting arrest that they new had a history of armed robbery, had skipped bail and was jumping into a car instead of following their instructions.
You or I would have the choice to just walk away. They do not if they are observing the call of duty.
However, I assume that more and more police will just walk away in the future if they choose to arrive at all in the first place.
Are you suggesting that the police must be shot BEFORE they can return fire and then it's okay? Is there EVER a reason that justifies the use of force?
Should all police officers be jailed on every occasion that any sort of force is employed?
Where in the statement does he incite mobs to violence?
Nice strawmen.
There will always be people who are uncooperative with police because they are frightened, have mental health issues, or are simply jerks. The police don't get to summarily execute them for that.The problem is NOT, as the Obama statement states, solely born by all police. The problem is the ongoing violence in our society and the resistance of our citizens to follow instructions given by the police.
I have had, guessing here, about 10 interactions with Uniformed Cops in my life. I have ALWAYS followed their instructions. I have NEVER been shot.
"Cooperate with police" since they are doing dangerous work in dangerous situations is THE message that the Obama statement should have featured. It was completely absent. It implied police malevolence.
What the Obamas did not do, as you claimed, is incite mobs to violence. Nothing in their statement does that.Police do vital work. Encouraging people who deal with cops to be cooperative seems like the thing that a responsible leader would do. Instead, the Obamas, AGAIN, instigate further cause for outrage.
When is it that you are going to claim to be mr. neutral again?
There will always be people who are uncooperative with police because they are frightened, have mental health issues, or are simply jerks. The police don't get to summarily execute them for that.
What the Obamas did not do, as you claimed, is incite mobs to violence. Nothing in their statement does that.
It does not, anywhere in the statement.Of course their statement does EXACTLY that.
You're moving the bar. The point is that they did not incite violent mobs in their statement.Please cite the language in their statement that points to the course(s) of action for those stopped by police that could reasonably be expected to help avoid a tragedy when dealing with the police.
It does not, anywhere in the statement.
You're moving the bar. The point is that they did not incite violent mobs in their statement.
And the police were negligent and stupid just on the face of it. Lets just for the sake of argument say that the Police were justified in stopping Wright and justified in attempting to cuff him and arrest him:It says quite clearly that the police are at fault and that it was negligence and stupidity that caused the tragedy.
The fact that the police knew they were dealing with a man who attempted an armed robbery along with a gun charge was resisting arrest and getting into his car. There could have been a gun inside.
As in most things, there is not only one side at fault.
Except in the blame the bad guy words from Obama. this was an ongoing tactic of Obama and works to benefit Democrat-Socialists at the polls as it hurts the country in general.
Why didn't he express sadness that the event occurred and wish the best to all involved asking for calm and urging that those who encounter police listen and behave as instructed?
Obama's words are intentional and well thought out to provoke and divide.
Most say race relations worsened under Obama, poll finds | CNN Politics
A majority of Americans say relations between blacks and whites in the US have worsened under President Barack Obama, according to a new CNN/ORC poll.www.cnn.com
And the police were negligent and stupid just on the face of it. Lets just for the sake of argument say that the Police were justified in stopping Wright and justified in attempting to cuff him and arrest him:
- why didn't they move him from drivers side door of the vehicle to the back of the vehicle, bend him over the trunk and attempt to cuff him there?
- why did the cop that shot him have her gun drawn in the first place and how did she brain fart her way to deciding she was firing her taser instead of her gun?
The entire incident smacks of negligence and stupidity even if one accepts that the Police were acting in a manner that was conducive to Public Safety in the first place and THAT itself is very much in question.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?